Validation of the norwegian version of hannover functional ability questionnaire

Spine

Volumn 35, Issue 14, 2010, Pages

  Magnussen, Liv Heide ^a,b   Lygren, Hildegunn ^c,d   Anderson, Bodil ^d   Breivik, Kyrre ^b   Strand, Liv Inger ^b,d  

^a Uni Environment   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

^c BERGEN UNIVERSITY COLLEGE   (Norway)

^d HAUKELAND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

Author keywords

Crosscultural translation; Factor analysis; Physical capability; Questionnaire; Reliability; Validity

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BACK PERFORMANCE SCALE; BACKACHE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEAR AVOIDANCE BELIEFS QUESTIONNAIRE; FEMALE; HANNOVER FUNCTIONAL ABILITY QUESTIONNAIRE; HUMAN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NORWAY; NUMERICAL RATING SCALE; OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT; PATIENT GLOBAL IMPRESSION OF CHANGE; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PHYSICAL CAPACITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; ROLAND MORRIS DISABILITY QUESTIONNAIRE; AGED; CULTURAL FACTOR; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; LOW BACK PAIN; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITY OF LIFE; STANDARDS; VALIDATION STUDY; YOUNG ADULT;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON; FEMALE; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; LOW BACK PAIN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NORWAY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77954031356     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d1320b     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Guyatt G, Jaeschke R, Feeny DH, et al.. Measurements in clinical trials: choosing the right approach. In: Spilker B, ed. Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven Publishers; 1996:41-48
2. Deyo RA, Andersson G, Bombardier C, et al.. Outcome measures for studying patients with low back pain. Spine 1994;19:2032S-6.
3. Deyo RA, Battie M, Beurskens AJ, et al.. Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use [erratum appears in Spine 1999;24:418]. Spine 1998;23:2003-2013
4. Beurskens AJ, de Vet HC, Koke AJ, et al.. Measuring the functional status of patients with low back pain. Assessment of the quality of four disease-specific questionnaires. Spine 1995;20:1017-1028
5. Kopec JA. Measuring functional outcomes in persons with back pain: a review of back-specific questionnaires. Spine 2000;25:3110-3114
6. Roland M, Fairbank J. The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. Spine 2000;25:3115-3124
7. Grotle M, Brox JI, Vollestad NK. Functional status and disability questionnaires: what do they assess? A systematic review of back-specific outcome questionnaires. Spine 2004;30:130-140
8. Spilker B. Quality of Life Assessments in Clinical Trials. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1990.
9. Kohlmann T, Raspe H. Die patientennahe Diagnostik von Functionseinschränkungen im Alltag. Psychomed 1994;6:21-27
10. Mayer T, Tabor J, Bovasso E, et al.. Physical progress and residual impairment quantification after functional restoration. Part I: lumbar mobility. Spine 1994;19:389-394 (Pubitemid 24073217)
11. Brady S, Mayer T, Gatchel R. Physical progress and residual impairment quantification after functional restoration. Part II: isokinetic trunk strength. Spine 1994;19:395-400. (Pubitemid 24073218)
12. Curtis L, Mayer TG, Gatchel R. Physical progress and residual impairment quantification after functional restoration. Part III: isokinetic and isoinertial lifting capacity. Spine 1994;19:401-405 (Pubitemid 24073219)
13. Roese I, Kohlmann T, Raspe H. [Measuring functional capacity in backache patients in rehabilitation: a comparison of standardized questionnaires]. Rehabilitation (Stuttg) 1996;35:103-108
14. Kohlmann T, Raspe H. [Hannover Functional Questionnaire in ambulatory diagnosis of functional disability caused by backache]. Rehabilitation (Stuttg) 1996;35:I-VIII.
15. Costello AB, Osborne JW. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Pract Assess Res Eval 2005;10:1-9.
16. Preacher KJ, MacCallum RC. Repairing Tom Swift's electric factor analysis machine. Understanding Statistics 2003;2:13-43.
17. Magnussen L, Strand LI, Skouen JS, et al.. Motivating disability pensioners with back pain to return to work-a randomized controlled trial. J Rehabil Med 2007;39:81-87
18. Magnussen L, Strand LI, Lygren H. Reliability and validity of the back performance scale: observing activity limitation in patients with back pain. Spine 2004;29:903-907
19. Sartorius N, Kuyken W. Translation of health status instruments. In: Orley J, Kuyken W, eds. Quality of Life Assessment: International Perspectives. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1994:3-18.
20. Roland M, Morris R. A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine 1983;8:141-144 (Pubitemid 13089565)
21. Grotle M, Brox JI, Vollestad NK. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Norwegian versions of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Index. J Rehabil Med 2003;35:241-247
22. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 1999;8:135-160
23. Waddell G, Newton M, Henderson I, et al.. A Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) and the role of fear-avoidance beliefs in chronic low back pain and disability. Pain 1993;52:157-168
24. Grotle M, Brox JI, Vollestad NK. Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire: methodological aspects of the Norwegian version. J Rehabil Med 2006;38:346-353
25. Jensen MP, Turner JA, Romano JM, et al.. Comparative reliability and validity of chronic pain intensity measures. Pain 1999;83:157-162
26. Farrar JT, Young JP, LaMoreaux L, et al.. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain 2001;94:149-158
27. Grotle M, Brox JI, Vollestad NK. Concurrent comparison of responsiveness in pain and functional status measurements used for patients with low back pain. Spine 2004;29:E492-501.
28. Strand LI, Moe-Nilssen R, Ljunggren AE. Back Performance Scale for the assessment of mobility-related activities in people with back pain. Phys Ther 2002;82:1213-1223
29. Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Wyrwich KW, et al.. Interpreting the clinical importance of treatment outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. J Pain 2008;9:105-121
30. Flora DB, Curran PJ. An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychol Methods 2004;9:466-491
31. Muthen BK, Muthen BO. Mplus User Guide. 3rd ed. Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen; 2004.
32. Muthen LK, Muthen BO. Mplus short courses topic 1. Exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and structural equation modeling for continuous outcomes. 2008. Available at: www.statmodel.com.
33. Zumbo BD, Gadermann AM, Zeisser C. Ordinal versions of coefficients alpha and theta for Likert rating scales. J Modern Appl Stat Methods 2007; 6:21-29
34. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, et al.. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007;60:34-42.
35. Andresen EM. Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81:S15-20.
36. Vlaeyen JW, Kole-Snijders AM, Boeren RG, et al.. Fear of movement/ (re)injury in chronic low back pain and its relation to behavioral performance. Pain 1995;62:363-372
37. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979;86:420-428
38. Stratford P. Reliability: consistency or differentiating among subjects? Phys Ther 1989;69:299-300.
39. Beckerman H, Roebroeck ME, Lankhorst GJ, et al.. Smallest real difference, a link between reproducibility and responsiveness. Qual Life Res 2001;10:571-578
40. Terwee CB, Dekker FW, Wiersinga WM, et al.. On assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments: guidelines for instrument evaluation. Qual Life Res 2003;12:349-362
41. Deyo RA, Centor RM. Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: an analogy to diagnostic test performance. J Chronic Dis 1986;39:897-906.
42. Beurskens AJ, de Vet HC, Koke AJ. Responsiveness of functional status in low back pain: a comparison of different instruments. Pain 1996;65:71-76
43. Davidson M, Keating JL. A comparison of five low back disability questionnaires: reliability and responsiveness. Phys Ther 2002;82:8-24.
44. Jöreskog KG. How Large Can a Standardized Coefficient Be? Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International; 1999. Available at: www.ssicentral.com.
45. Wittink H, Rogers W, Sukiennik A, et al.. Physical functioning: self-report and performance measures are related but distinct. Spine 2003;28:2407-2413
46. Pfingsten M, Kroner-Herwig B, Leibing E, et al.. Validation of the German version of the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ). Eur J Pain 2000;4:259-266
47. Ostelo RW, Deyo RA, Stratford P, et al.. Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain: towards international consensus regarding minimal important change. Spine 2008;33:90-94