Strongly coupling of partitioned fluid-solid interaction solvers using reduced-order models

Applied Mathematical Modelling

Volumn 34, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 3817-3830

  Wang, W Q ^a   Yan, Y ^a  

^a KUNMING UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Flow induced vibration; Fluid structure interaction; Reduced order model; Strongly coupled approach

Indexed keywords

BLACK BOXES; COMPUTATIONAL COSTS; COMPUTATIONAL RESULTS; COUPLING PROCESS; ELASTIC PLATE; EXPERIMENTAL DATA; FINITE ELEMENT FORMULATIONS; FLOW INDUCED VIBRATIONS; FLUID SOLID INTERACTION; INCOMPRESSIBLE FLUID FLOW; INCOMPRESSIBLE VISCOUS FLUIDS; LIFT FORCE; NUMERICAL RESULTS; REDUCED ORDER MODELS; RIGID BODY; STRESS MODES; STRUCTURAL PROBLEMS; STRUCTURAL SOLVER;

COST REDUCTION; FLUID STRUCTURE INTERACTION; FLUIDS; NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS; RIVERS; UNSTEADY FLOW; VIBRATIONS (MECHANICAL); VISCOUS FLOW;

PLATES (STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS);

EID: 77954028489     PISSN: 0307904X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2010.03.022     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Modelling Fluid Flow: The State of the Art 2004, 269-434. Springer-Verlag Press, Berlin. J. Vad, T. Lajos, R. Schilling (Eds.).
2. Liew K.M., Wang W.Q., Zhang L.X., He X.Q. A computational approach for predicting hydroelasticity of flexible structures based on the pressure Poisson equation. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 2007, 72:1560-1583.
3. Zhang L.X., Guo Y., Wang W.Q. Large eddy simulation of turbulent flow in a true 3D Francis hydro turbine passage with dynamical fluid-structure interaction. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 2007, 54:517-541.
4. Wang W.Q., Zhang L.X., Yan Y., Guo Y. Large-eddy simulation of turbulent flow considering inflow wakes in a Francis turbine blade passage. J. Hydrodyn. Ser. B 2007, 19:201-209.
5. Wu X.H., Durbin P.A. Evidence of longitudinal vortices evolved from distorted wakes in a turbine passage. J. Fluid Mech. 2001, 446:199-228.
6. Bathe K.J., Zhang H., Wang W.H. Finite element analysis of incompressible and compressible fluid flows with free surfaces and structural interactions. Comput. Struct. 1995, 56:193-213.
7. Sarrate J., Huerta A., Donea J. Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian formulation for fluid-rigid body interaction. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 2001, 190:3171-3188.
8. Rugonyi S., Bathe K.J. On finite element analysis of fluid flows fully coupled with structural interactions. Comput. Model. Eng. Sci. 2001, 2:195-212.
9. Heil M. An efficient solver for the fully coupled solution of large-displacement fluid-structure interaction problems. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 2004, 193:1-23.
10. Cervera M., Codina R., Galindo M. On the computational efficiency and implementation of block-iterative algorithms for nonlinear coupled problems. Eng. Comput. 1996, 13:4-30.
11. Piperno S. Explicit/implicit fluid-structure staggered procedures with a structural predictor and fluid subcycling for 2D inviscid aeroelastic simulations. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 1997, 25:1207-1226.
12. Farhat C., Lesoinne M. Two efficient staggered algorithms for the serial and parallel solution of three-dimensional nonlinear transient aeroelastic problems. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 2000, 182:499-515.
13. Matthies H.G., Steindorf J. Partitioned strong coupling algorithms for fluid-structure interaction. Comput. Struct. 2003, 81:805-812.
14. Guruswany G.P., Byun C. Fluid-structure interaction using Navier-Stokes flow equations coupled with shell finite element structure. AIAA J. 1993, 3087.
15. Garica J.A., Guruswany G.P. Aeroelastic analysis of transonic wings using Navier-Stokes equations and a nonlinear beam finite element model. AIAA J. 1999, 1215.
16. Ramji K., Wei S. Fluid-structure interaction for aeroelastic applications. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 2004, 40:535-558.
17. Wang W.Q., Zhang L.X., Yan Y. Numerical simulation of flow with large-amplitude oscillation of solid boundaries by penalty finite element formulations. Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 2008, 22:4205-4216.
18. Matthies H.G., Niekamp R., Steindorf J. Algorithms for strong coupling procedures. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 2006, 195:2028-2049.
19. Wall W.A., Genkinger S., Ramm E. A strong coupling partitioned approach for fluid-structure interaction with free surfaces. Comput. Fluids 2007, 36:169-183.
20. Wood C., Gil A.J., Hassan O., Bonet J. Partitioned block-Gauss-Seidel coupling for dynamic fluid-structure interaction. Comput. Struct. 2008, 10.1016/j.compstruc.2008.08.005.
21. Slone A.K., Pericleous K., Bailey C., Cross M., Bennett C. A finite volume unstructured mesh approach to dynamic fluid-structure interaction: An assessment of the challenge of predicting the onset of flutter. Appl. Math. Model. 2004, 28:211-239.
22. Vierendeels J. Implicit coupling of partitioned fluid-structure interaction solvers using a reduced-order model. Fluid-structure Interaction: Modeling, Simulation, Optimization 2006, Springer, New York. H.J. Bungartz, M. Schafer (Eds.).
23. Hassan O., Probert E.J., Morgan K., Weatherill N. Unsteady flow simulation using unstructured meshes. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 2000, 189:1247-1275.
24. Degand C., Farhat C. A three-dimensional torsional spring analogy method for unstructured dynamic meshes. Comput. Struct. 2002, 80:305-316.
25. Thomas P.D., Lombard C.K. Geometric conservation law and its application to flow computations on moving grids. AIAA J. 1979, 17:1030-1037.
26. Lesoinne M., Farhat C., Maman N. Geometric conservation laws for problems involving moving boundaries and deforming meshes, and their impact on aeroelastic computations. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 1996, 134:71-90.
27. Koobus B., Farhat C. Second-order time-accurate and geometrically conservative implicit schemes for flow computations on unstructured dynamic meshes. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 1999, 170:103-129.
28. Farhat C., van der Zee K.G., Geuzaine P.H. Provably second-order time-accurate loosely-coupled solution algorithms for transient nonlinear computational aeroelasticity. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 2001, 195:1973-2001.
29. Carstens V., Kemme R., Schmitt S. Coupled simulation of flow-structure interaction in turbomachinery. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 2003, 7:298-306.
30. W.A. Wall, Fluid-struktur-interaktion mitstabilisieten finiten elementen, Ph.D. Thesis, University Stuttgart, Institut für Baustatik, 2000.
31. Dettmer W., Períc D. A computational framework for fluid-structure interaction: finite element formulation and applications. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 2006, 195:5754-5779.