Magnetic resonance venography

Applied Radiology

Volumn 39, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 36-42

  Glockner, James F ^a   Lee, Christine U ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; KIDNEY CARCINOMA; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PHLEBOGRAPHY; REVIEW; STEADY STATE; TIME OF FLIGHT MASS SPECTROMETRY;

EID: 77954019330     PISSN: 01609963     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Carpenter JP, Holland GA, Baum RA, et al. Magnetic resonance venography for detection of deep venous thrombosis: comparison with contrast venography and duplex Doppler ultrasonography. J Vasc Surg. 1993;18:734-741.
2. Evans AJ, Sostman HD, Knelson MH, et al. Detection of deep venous thrombosis: prospective comparison of MR imaging with contrast venography. AJR. 1993;161:131-139.
3. Vogt FM, Herborn CU, Goyen M. MR venography. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2005; 13:113-129.
4. Cantwell CP, Cradock A, Bruzzi J, et al. MR venography with true fast imaging with steady-state precession for suspected lower-limb deep vein thrombosis. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2006; 17:1763-1769.
5. Wilson MW, LaBerge JM, Kerlan RK, et al. MR portal venography: Preliminary results of fast acquisition without contrast material or breath holding. Acad Radiol. 2002;9:1179-1184.
6. Miyazaki M, Lee VS. Nonenhanced MR angiography. Radiology. 2008;248:20-43.
7. Ito K, Koike S, Shimizu A, et al. Portal venous system: evaluation with unenhanced MR angiography with a single-breath-hold ECG-synchronized 3D half-Fourier fast spin-echo sequence. AJR. 2008;191:550-554.
8. Ono A, Murase K, Taniguchi T, et al. Deep vein thrombosis using noncontrast-enhanced MR venography with electrocardiographically gated three-dimensional half-fourier FSE: Preliminary experience. Magn Reson Med. 2009;e-published ahead of print.
9. Choyke PL, Walther MCM, Wagner JR, et al. Renal cancer: Preoperative evaluation with dualphase, three-dimensional MR angiography. Radiology. 1997;205:767-771.
10. Shinde TS, Lee VS, Rofsky NM, et al. Threedimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR venographic evaluation of patency of central veins in the thorax: Initial experience. Radiology. 1999;213:555-560.
11. Lin J, Zhou KR, Chen ZW, et al. Vena cava 3D contrast-enhanced MR venography: A pictorial review. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2005;28: 795-805.
12. Ernst O, Asnar RV, Sergent G, et al. Comparing contrast-enhanced breath-hold MR angiography and conventional angiography in the evaluation of the mesenteric circulation. AJR. 2000;174:433-439.
13. Ruehm SG, Zimny K, Debatin JF. Direct contrast-enhanced 3D MR venography. Eur Radiol. 2001;11:102-112.
14. Tanju S, Sancak T, Dusunceli E, et al. Direct contrast-enhanced 3D MR venography evaluation of upper extremity deep venous system. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2006;12:74-79.
15. Valsangiacomo ER, Levasseur S, McCrindle BW, et al. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of pulmonary venous abnormalities in children. Pediatr Radiol. 2003;33:92-98.
16. Laissy JP, Menegazzo D, Debray MP, et al. Renal carcinoma: Diagnosis of venous invasion with Gd-enhanced MR venography. Eur Radiol. 2000;10:1138-1143.
17. Hallscheidt PJ, Fink C, Haferkamp A, et al. Preoperative staging of renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava thrombus using multidetector CT and MRI: Prospective study with histopathological correlation. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2005; 29:64-68.
18. Kluge A, Mueller C, Strunk J, et al. Experience in 207 combined MRI examinations for acute pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis. AJR. 2006;186:1686-1696.