MR venography with true fast imaging with steady-state precession for suspected lower-limb deep vein thrombosis

Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology

Volumn 17, Issue 11 I, 2006, Pages 1763-1770

  Cantwell, Colin Patrick ^a   Cradock, Andrea ^a   Bruzzi, John ^a   Fitzpatrick, Patricia ^b   Eustace, Stephen ^a   Murray, John G ^a  

^a MATER MISERICORDIAE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Ireland)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IODINATED CONTRAST MEDIUM; NONIONIC CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ADULT; AGED; APPARATUS; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; FEMORAL VEIN; GASTROCNEMIUS MUSCLE; HUMAN; ILIAC VEIN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGING SYSTEM; INFERIOR CAVA VEIN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LEG THROMBOSIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE VENOGRAPHY; MALE; MUSCLE BLOOD VESSEL; NON INVASIVE MEASUREMENT; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PELVIS; PERONEAL VEIN; PHLEBOGRAPHY; POPLITEAL VEIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RELIABILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THIGH; TIBIA; TIBIAL VEIN; TRUE FAST IMAGING WITH STEADY STATE PRECESSION; VEIN;

EID: 33751278918     PISSN: 10510443     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.RVI.0000242502.40626.53     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Anderson FA, Wheeler HB, Goldberg RJ, et al. A population-based perspective of the hospital incidence and case fatality rates of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: the Worcester DVT study. Arch Intern Med 1991; 151:933-938.
2. Spuentrup E, Buecker A, Stuber M, et al. MR-venography using high resolution true-FISP. Rofo 2001; 173:686-690.
3. Ruehm SG, Wiesner W, Debatin JF. Pelvic and lower extremity veins: contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR venography with a dedicated vascular coil - initial experience. Radiology 2000; 215:421-427.
4. Erdman WA, Jayson HT, Redman HC, et al. Deep venous thrombosis of extremities: role of MR imaging in the diagnosis. Radiology 1990; 174:425-431.
5. Vukov L, Berquist T, King B. Magnetic resonance imaging of calf deep venous thrombophlebitis. Ann Emerg Med 1991; 20:497-499.
6. Holland GA, Baum RA, Carpenter J, et al. Evaluation of MR venography in the detection of deep venous thrombosis in the veins of the pelvis and lower extremities. In Proceedings of the 11th Annual Scientific Meeting of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine; 1992; Berlin, Germany.
7. Spritzer CE, Norconk JJ Sostman HD, et al. Detection of deep venous thrombosis by magnetic resonance imaging. Chest 1993; 104:54-60.
8. Evans AJ, Sostman HD, Knelson MH, et al. Detection of deep venous thrombosis: prospective comparison of MR imaging with contrast venography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993; 161:131-139.
9. Carpenter JP, Holland GA, Baum RA, et al. Magnetic resonance venography for the detection of deep venous thrombosis: comparison with contrast venography and duplex Doppler ultrasonography. J Vasc Surg 1993; 18:734-741.
10. Montgomery KD, Potter HG, Helfet DL. Magnetic resonance venography to evaluate the deep venous system of the pelvis in patients who have an acetabular fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995; 77:1639-1649.
11. Dupas B, el Kouri D, Curtet C, et al. Angiomagnetic resonance imaging of iliofemorocaval venous thrombosis. Lancet 1995; 346:17-19.
12. Laissy J, Cinqualbre A, Loshkajian A, et al. Assessment of deep venous thrombosis in the lower limbs and pelvis: MR venography versus duplex Doppler sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 167:971-975.
13. Catalano C, Pavone P, Laghi A, et al. Role of MR venography in the evaluation of deep venous thrombosis. Acta Radiol 1997; 38:907-912.
14. Lebowitz JA, Rofsky NM, Krinsky GA, et al. Gadolinium-enhanced body MR venography with subtraction technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169:755-758.
15. Moody AR, Pollock JG, O'Connor AR, et al. Lower-limb deep venous thrombosis: direct MR imaging of the thrombus. Radiology 1998; 209:349-355.
16. Sica GT, Pugach ME, Koniais LS, et al. Isolated calf vein thrombosis: comparison of MR venography and conventional venography after initial sonography in symptomatic patients. Acad Radiol 2001; 8:856-863.
17. Fraser DG, Moody AR, Morgan PS, et al. Diagnosis of lower-limb deep venous thrombosis: a prospective blinded study of magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging. Ann Intern Med 2002; 136:89-98.
18. Larsson EM, Sunden P, Olsson CG, et al. MR venography using an intravascular contrast agent: results from a multicenter phase 2 study of dosage. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180:227-232.
19. Fraser DGW, Moody AR, Davidson IR, et al. Deep venous thrombosis: venous enhanced subtracted peak arterial MR venography versus contrast venography for diagnosis. Radiology 2003; 226:812-820.
20. Sevitz S, Gallagher N. Venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a clinico-pathological study in injured and burned patients. Br J Surg 1961; 48:475-489.
21. Lagerstedt C, Olsson C, Fagher B, et al. Need for long term anticoagulant treatment in symptomatic calf vein thrombosis. Lancet 1985; 2:515-518.
22. Kakkar VV, Flanc C, Howe CT, et al. Natural history of postoperative deep-vein thrombosis. Lancet 1969; 2:230-233.
23. Kearon C. Natural history of venous thromboembolism. Circulation 2003; 107:22-30.
24. Quinlan D, Alikhan R, Gishen P, et al. Variations in lower limb venous anatomy: implications for US diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis. Radiology 2003; 228:443-448.
25. Liu G, Ferris E, Reifsteck J, et al. Effect of anatomic variations on deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremity. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1986; 146:845-848.
26. American Thoracic Society. The diagnostic approach to acute venous thromboembolism. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999; 160:1043-1066.
27. Evans A, Sostman H, Witty L, et al. Detection of deep venous thrombosis: prospective comparison of MR imaging and sonography. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996; 1:44-51.
28. Cornuz J, Pearson S, Polak J. Deep venous thrombosis: complete lower extremity venous US evaluation in patients without known risk factors - outcome study. Radiology 1999; 211:637-641.