The influence of hydrology and waterway distance on population structure of Chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha in a large river

Journal of Fish Biology

Volumn 76, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1128-1148

  Olsen, J B ^a   Beacham, T D ^b   Wetklo, M ^b   Seeb, L W ^c,d   Smith, C T ^c,e   Flannery, B G ^a   Wenburg, J K ^a  

^a U S FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE   (United States)

^b PACIFIC BIOLOGICAL STATION   (Canada)

^c ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^e ABERNATHY FISH TECHNOLOGY CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Chinook salmon; Hydrology; Isolation by distance; Yukon River

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA; ONCORHYNCHUS; ONCORHYNCHUS TSHAWYTSCHA;

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

ALLELE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; GEOGRAPHY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; POPULATION DYNAMICS; POPULATION GENETICS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RIVER; SALMON; WATER FLOW;

ALLELES; ANIMALS; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS, POPULATION; GENOTYPE; GEOGRAPHY; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RIVERS; SALMON; WATER MOVEMENTS;

EID: 77953987466     PISSN: 00221112     EISSN: 10958649     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2010.02554.x     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Anderson M J, Ford R B, Feary D A, Honeywill C. Quantitative measures of sedimentation in an estuarine system and its relationship with intertidal soft-sediment infauna. Marine Ecology Progress Series 2004, 272:33-48.
2. Angers B, Magnan P, Plante M, Bernatchez L. Canonical correspondence analysis for estimating spatial and environmental effects on microsatellite gene diversity in brook charr (Salvelinus fontinalis). Molecular Ecology 1999, 8:1043-1053.
3. Beacham T D, Jonsen K L, Supernault J, Wetklo M, Deng L, Varnavskaya N. Pacific rim population structure of Chinook salmon as determined from microsatellite analysis. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 2006, 135:1604-1621.
4. Bernatchez L, Dodson J J. Relationship between bioenergetics and behavior in anadromous fish migrations. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 1987, 44:399-407.
5. Bohonak A J. IBD (isolation by distance): a program for analyses of isolation by distance. Journal of Heredity 2002, 93:153-144.
6. Brabets T P, Wang B, Meade R H. Environmental and hydrologic overview of the Yukon River Basin, Alaska and Canada. 2000, Anchorage, AK, U.S. Geological Survey
7. Carmichael L E, Krizan J, Nagy J A, Fuglei E, Dumond M, Johnson D, Veitch A, Berteaux D, Strobeck C. Historical and ecological determinants of genetic structure in arctic canids. Molecular Ecology 2007, 16:3466-3483.
8. Castellano S, Balletto E. Is the partial Mantel test inadequate? Evolution 2002, 56:1871-1873.
9. Cooper A B, Mangel M. The dangers of ignoring metapopulation structure for the conservation of salmonids. Fishery Bulletin 1999, 97:213-226.
10. Costello A B, Down T E, Pollard S M, Pacas C J, Taylor E B. The influence of history and contemporary stream hydrology on the evolution of genetic diversity within species: an examination of microsatellite DNA variation in Bull trout, Salvelinus confluentus (Pisces: Salmonidae). Evolution 2003, 57:328-344.
11. Fausch K D, Torgerson C E, Baxter C V, Li H W. Landscapes to riverscapes: bridging the gap between research and conservation of stream fishes. BioScience 2002, 52:483-498.
12. Ford M J. Testing models of migration and isolation among populations of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Evolution 1998, 52:539-557.
13. Frankham R J, Ballou D, Briscoe D A. Introduction to Conservation Genetics 2002, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
14. Habicht C, Olsen J B, Fair L, Seeb J E. Smaller effective population sizes evidenced by loss of microsatellite alleles in tributary-spawning populations of sockeye salmon from the Kvichak River, Alaska drainage. Environmental Biology of Fishes 2004, 69:51-62.
15. Hardy O J, Vekemans X. SPAGEDI: a versatile computer program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the individual or population level. Molecular Ecology Notes 2002, 2:618-620.
16. Hardy O J, Charbonnel N, Freville H, Heuertz M. Microsatellite allele sizes: a simple test to assess their significance on genetic differentiation. Genetics 2003, 163:1467-1482.
17. Healy M C. Life history of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Pacific Salmon Life Histories 1991, 313-393. Groot CMargolis L. eds), Vancouver, BC, University of British Columbia Press
18. Hébert C, Danzman R G, Jones M W, Bernatchez L. Hydrography and population structure in brook charr (Salvelinus fontinalis, Mitchill) from eastern Canada. Molecular Ecology 2000, 9:971-982.
19. Hendry A P, Castric V, Kinnison M T, Quinn T P. The evolution of philopatry and dispersal: homing versus straying in salmonids. Evolution Illuminated: Salmon and Their Relatives 2004, 52-91. Hendry A P, Stearns S, eds), Oxford, Oxford University Press
20. Keefer M L, Peery C A, Jepson M A, Stuehrenberg L C. Upstream migration rates of radio-tagged adult Chinook salmon in riverine habitats of the Columbia River basin. Journal of Fish Biology 2004, 65:1126-1141.
21. Keefer M L, Caudill C C, Peery C A, Boggs C T. Non-direct homing behaviours by adult Chinook salmon in a large, multi-stock river system. Journal of Fish Biology 2008, 72:27-44.
22. Koizumi I, Yamamoto S, Maekawa K. Decomposed pairwise regression analysis of genetic and geographic distances reveals a metapopulation structure of stream-dwelling Dolly Varden charr. Molecular Ecology 2006, 15:3175-3189.
23. Lindsey C C, McPhail J D. Zoogeography of fishes of the Yukon and Mackenzie basins. The Zoogeography of North American Freshwater Fishes 1986, 639-674. Hocutt C H, Wiley E O. eds), New York, NY, Wiley
24. Lugon-Moulin N, Hausser J. Phylogeographical structure, postglacial recolonization and barriers to gene flow in the distinctive Valais chromosome race of the common shrew (Sorex araneus). Molecular Ecology 2002, 11:785-794.
25. Manel S, Schwartz M K, Luikart G, Taberlet P. Landscape genetics: combining landscape ecology and population genetics. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2003, 18:189-197.
26. Quinn T P. Homing and patterns of straying. The Behavior and Ecology of Pacific Salmon and Trout 2005, 85-104. Quinn T P. ed.), Seattle, WA, University of Washington Press
27. Raufaste N, Rousset F. Are partial Mantel tests adequate? Evolution 2001, 55:1703-1705.
28. Rice W R. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 1989, 43:223-225.
29. Rousset F. Genetic differentiation and estimation of gene flow from F-statistics under isolation by distance. Genetics 1997, 145:1219-1228.
30. Slatkin M. A measure of population subdivision based on microsatellite allele frequencies. Genetics 1995, 139:457-462.
31. Smouse P E, Long J C, Sokal R R. Multiple regression and correlation extensions of the Mantel test matrix correspondence. Systematic Zoology 1986, 35:627-632.
32. Taylor E B. Phenotypic correlates of life-history variation in juvenile Chinook salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha. Journal of Animal Ecology 1990, 59:455-468.
33. Templin W D, Wilmot R L, Guthrie C M, Seeb L W. United States and Canadian Chinook salmon populations in the Yukon River can be segregated based on genetic characteristics. Alaska Fisheries Research Bulletin 2005, 11:44-60.
34. Waples R S, Teel D J, Myers J M, Marshall A R. Life-history divergence in Chinook salmon: historic contingency and parallel evolution. Evolution 2004, 58:386-403.
35. Waples R S, Zabel R W, Scheuerel M D, Sanderson B L. Evolutionary responses by native species to major anthropogenic changes to their ecosystems: Pacific salmon in the Columbia River hydropower system. Molecular Ecology 2008, 17:84-96.
36. Weir B S, Cockerham C C. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 1984, 38:1358-1370.
37. Wright S. Isolation by distance. Genetics 1943, 28:114-138.
38. Anderson M J. DISTLM forward: a FORTRAN computer program to calculate a distance-based multivariate analysis for a linear model using forward selection 2003, http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~mja/Programs.htm, Auckland, Department of Statistics, University of Auckland, Available at
39. Eiler J H, Spencer T R, Pella J J, Mesuda M M, Holder R R. Distribution and movement patterns of Chinook salmon returning to the Yukon River basin in 2000-2002. 2004, http://access.afsc.noaa.gov/pubs/search.cfm, - Available at
40. Flannery B, Beacham T, Wetklo M, Smith C, Templin B, Antonovich A, Seeb L, Miller S, Schlei O, Wenburg J. Run timing, migratory patterns, and harvest information of Chinook salmon stocks within the Yukon River. 2006, 92. http://alaska.fws.gov/fisheries/genetics/reports.htm, Anchorage, AK, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Conservation Genetics Laboratory, Available at
41. Goudet J. FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (version 2.9.3). 2001, http://www.unil.ch/izea/softwares/fstat.html, Available at