Seasonal changes of functional groups in coleopteran communities in pine forests

Biodiversity and Conservation

Volumn 19, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 2291-2305

  Choi, Won Il ^a   Choi, Kwang Sik ^a   Lyu, Dong Pyeo ^b   Lee, Jung Su ^a   Lim, Jongok ^c   Lee, Seunghwan ^c   Shin, Sang Chul ^a   Chung, Yeong Jin ^a   Park, Young Seuk ^d  

^a Korea Forest Research Institute   (South Korea)

^b Sangji University   (South Korea)

^c Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^d Kyung Hee University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Coleoptera community; Coleoptera diversity; Community succession; Functional groups; Multivariate analyses; Response to resource changes

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITY COMPOSITION; COMMUNITY RESPONSE; CONIFEROUS FOREST; DECOMPOSITION; DOMINANCE; ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FOOD AVAILABILITY; FOREST ECOSYSTEM; FUNCTIONAL GROUP; HABITAT QUALITY; INSECT; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PRIMARY PRODUCTION; SEASONAL VARIATION; SUCCESSION;

KOREA;

COLEOPTERA; PINUS DENSIFLORA;

EID: 77953979767     PISSN: 09603115     EISSN: 15729710     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10531-010-9842-9     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Amman GD (1977) The role of the mountain pine beetle in lodgepole pine ecosystems: impacts on succession. In: Mattson WJ (ed) Proceedings in life sciences: the role of arthropods in forest ecosystems. Springer-Verlag, Inc., New York, pp 3-18.
2. Andrew NR, Hughes L (2004) Species diversity and structure of phytophagous beetle assemblages along a latitudinal gradient: predicting the potential impacts of climate change. Ecol Entomol 29: 527-542.
3. Andrew NR, Hughes L (2005) Arthropod community structure along a latitudinal gradient: implications for future impacts of climate change. Austral Ecol 30: 281-297.
4. Begon M, Harper JL, Townsend CR (1996) Ecology. Blackwell Science, Oxford.
5. Blondel J (2003) Guilds or functional groups: does it matter? Oikos 100: 223-232.
6. Borror DJ, Triplehorn CA, Johnson NF (1989) An introduction to the study of insects. Saunders College Publishing, Orlando.
7. Buddle CM, Langor DW, Pohl GR, Spence JR (2006) Arthropod response to harvesting and wildfire: implications for emulation of natural disturbance in forest management. Biol Conserv 128: 346-357.
8. Chapman SK (2006) Herbivory differentially alters plant litter dynamics of evergreen and deciduous trees. Oikos 114: 566-574.
9. Clough Y, Kruess A, Tscharntke T (2007) Organic versus conventional arable farming systems: functional grouping helps understand staphylinid response. Agric Ecosyst Environ 118: 285-290.
10. Collett NG (2007) Effect of fire retardant application on heathland surface-dwelling families of the order Coleoptera (beetles) in Victoria, Australia. For Ecol Manage 253: 232-243.
11. da Silva PM, Aguiar CAS, Niemelä J, Sousa JP, Serrano ARM (2008) Diversity patterns of ground-beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) along a gradient of land-use disturbance. Agric Ecosyst Environ 124: 270-274.
12. Gibb H, Pettersson RB, Hjältén J, Hilszczański J, Ball JP, Johansson T, Atlegrim O, Danell K (2006) Conservation-oriented forestry and early successional saproxylic beetles: responses of functional groups to manipulated dead wood substrates. Biol Conserv 129: 437-450.
13. Harvey JA, van der Putten WH, Turin H, Wagenaar R, Bezemer TM (2008) Effects of changes in plant species richness and community traits on carabid assemblages and feeding guilds. Agric Ecosyst Environ 127: 100-106.
14. Hutcheson J (1990) Characterization of terrestrial insect communities using quantified, Malaise-trapped Coleoptera. Ecol Entomol 15: 143-151.
15. Jansen A (1997) Terrestrial invertebrate community structure as an indicator of the success of a tropical rainforest restoration project. Restor Ecol 5: 115-124.
16. Jonsell M, Nordlander G (2002) Insects in polypore fungi as indicator species: a comparison between forest sites differing in amounts and continuity of dead wood. For Ecol Manage 157: 101-118.
17. Juke MR, Ferris R, Peace AJ (2002) The influence of stand structure and composition on diversity of canopy Coleoptera in coniferous plantations in Britain. For Ecol Manage 163: 27-41.
18. Karen M, John O, John B, Paul G, Josephine P, Thomas K (2008) Distribution and composition of carabid beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) communities across the plantation forest cycle-implications for management. For Ecol Manage 256: 624-632.
19. Lassau SA, Hochuli DF, Cassis G, Reid CAM (2005) Effects of habitat complexity on forest beetle diversity: do functional groups responds consistently? Divers Distrib 11: 73-82.
20. Latty EF, Werner SM, Mlandenoff DJ, Raffa KF, Sickley TA (2006) Response of ground beetle (Carabidae) assemblages to logging history in northern hardwood-hemlock forests. For Ecol Manage 222: 335-347.
21. Leksono AS, Takada K, Koji S, Nakagoshi N, Anggraeni T, Nakamura K (2005) Vertical and seasonal distribution of flying beetles in a suburban temperate deciduous forest collected by water pan trap. Insect Sci 12: 199-206.
22. McCune B, Mefford MJ (1999) PC-Ord: multivariate analysis of ecological data. Version 4. 25. MjM Software, Gleneden Beach.
23. Moore JC, Walter DE, Hunt HW (1988) Arthropod regulation of micro- and mesobiota in below-ground detrital food webs. Annu Rev Entomol 33: 419-439.
24. New TR (1998) The role of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in monitoring programmes in Australia. Ann Zool Fenn 35: 163-171.
25. Økland B, Berryman A (2004) Resource dynamics plays a key role in regional fluctuations of the spruce bark beetles Ips typographus. Agr Forest Entomol 6: 141-146.
26. Paoletti MG, Hassall M (1999) Woodlice (Isopoda: Oniscidae): their potential for assessing sustainability and use as bioindicators. Agric Ecosyst Environ 74: 157-165.
27. Rainio J, Niemelä J (2003) Ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) as bioindicators. Biodivers Conserv 12: 487-506.
28. Ribera I, Dolédec S, Downie IS, Foster GN (2001) Effect of land disturbance and stress on species traits of ground beetle assemblages. Ecology 82: 1112-1129.
29. Ritchie ME, Tilman D, Knops JMH (1998) Herbivore effects on plant and nitrogen dynamics in oak savanna. Ecology 79: 165-177.
30. Salmon S, Frizzera L, Camaret S (2008) Linking forest dynamics to richness and assemblage of soil zoological groups and to soil mineralization processes. For Ecol Manage 256: 1612-1623.
31. Symstad AJ, Siemann E, Haarstad J (2000) An experimental test of the effect of plant functional group diversity on arthropod diversity. Oikos 89: 243-253.
32. Systat Software Inc. (2004) SYSTAT 11 (data analysis software system). www. systat. com.
33. Tews L, Brose U, Grimm V, Tielborger K, Wichmann MC, Schwager M, Jeltsch F (2004) Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: the imnportance of keystone structures. J Biogeogr 31: 79-92.
34. Ulyshen MD, Hanula JL (2009) Habitat associations of saproxylic beetles in the southeastern United States: a comparison of forest types, tree species and wood postures. For Ecol Manage 257: 653-664.
35. Wardle DA, Bonner KI, Baker GM (2000) Stability of ecosystem properties in response to above-ground functional group richness and composition. Oikos 89: 11-23.