3-D motion estimation by integrating visual cues in 2-D multi-modal opti-acoustic stereo sequences

Computer Vision and Image Understanding

Volumn 114, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 928-941

  Negahdaripour, S ^a   Taatian, Ali ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI   (United States)

Author keywords

3 D motion estimation; Multi modal stereo imaging; Sonar and opical stereo imaging; Structure from Motion

Indexed keywords

3D RECONSTRUCTION; AUTOMATED OPERATIONS; COMMERCIAL MARKET; HIGH FREQUENCY HF; HIGH RESOLUTION; MONOCULAR VISION; MULTI-MODAL; OBJECT RECONSTRUCTION; OPTICAL CAMERA; OPTICAL IMAGING; OPTICAL MOTION; SONAR DATA; SONAR IMAGING; STEREO IMAGING; STEREO MATCHING; STEREOSEQUENCE; STRUCTURE FROM MOTION; SUBMERSIBLE PLATFORMS; SYNTHETIC AND REAL DATA; TECHNICAL CONTRIBUTION; TURBID WATER; UNDERWATER APPLICATION; VISION BASED NAVIGATION; VISUAL CUES;

ESTIMATION; INTEGRATION; MARINE RISERS; MODAL ANALYSIS; MOTION ESTIMATION; SONAR; SUBMERSIBLES; TARGETS; UNDERWATER ACOUSTICS; VISIBILITY;

THREE DIMENSIONAL;

EID: 77953962662     PISSN: 10773142     EISSN: 1090235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cviu.2010.04.005     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. http://www.codaoctopus.com/3d_ac_im/index.asp.
2. http://www.soundmetrics.com.
3. http://www.blueviewtech.com/.
4. Adiv G. Inherent ambiguities in recovering 3-D motion and structure from a noisy flow field. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 11 5 (1989) 477-489
5. C. Barat, M.J. Rendas, Exploiting natural contours for automatic sonar-to-video calibration, in: Proc. Oceans, vol. 1, Brest, France, June, 2005, pp. 271-275.
6. E.O. Belcher, D.G. Gallagher, J.R. Barone, R.E. Honaker, Acoustic lens camera and underwater display combine to provide efficient and effective hull and berth inspections, in: Proc. Oceans'03, San Diego, CA, September, 2003.
7. J.A. Beraldin, Integration of laser scanning and close-range photography - the last decade and beyond, in: Proc. XXth ISPRS Congress (Comm-V papers), Istanbul, 2004.
8. U. Castellani, A. Fusiello, V. Murino, L. Papaleo, E. Puppo, M. Pittore, A complete system for on-line 3D modelling from acoustic images, in: Signal Proc. Image Comm., vol. 20, 2005.
9. Eustice R.M., Singh H., Leonard J.J., and Walter M.R. Visually mapping the RMS titanic: conservative covariance estimates for SLAM information filters. Int. J. Robot. Res. 25 12 (2006) 1223-1242
10. Fusiello A., and Murino V. Augmented scene modeling and visualization by optical and acoustic sensor integration. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graphics 10 5 (2004) 625-636
11. R. Hartley, In defence of the 8-point algorithm, in: 5th Int. Conf. on Computer Vision (ICCV95), 1995, pp. 1064-1070.
12. Hartley R.I., and Zisserman A. Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision (2000), Cambridge Univ. Press
13. Kamgar-Parsi B., Rosenblum L.J., and Belcher E.O. Underwater imaging with a moving acoustic lens. IEEE Trans. Image Proc. 7 1 (1998)
14. Kocak D.M., and Caimi F.M. The current art of underwater imaging - with a glimpse of the past and vision of the future. MTS J. 39 3 (2005) 50-65
15. Kocak D.M., Dalgeleish F.R., Caimi F.M., and Schechner Y.Y. A focus on recent developments and trends in underwater imaging. MTS J. 42 1 (2008) 50-65
16. Lowe D.G. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 60 2 (2004) 91-110
17. Lucas B.D., and Kanade T. An iterative image registration technique with an application to stereo vision. Proc. Int. Joint Conf. Artif. Intell. (1981) 674-679
18. Longuet-Higgins H.C. A computer algorithm for reconstructing a scene from two projections. Nature 293 September (1981) 133-135
19. Longuet-Higgins H.C. The visual ambiguity of a moving plane. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 223 (1984)
20. P.Y. Mignotte, Content-Based Registration of Side-Scan Sonar Images, Ph.D. Thesis, School of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, July 2008.
21. Moore K.D., Jaffe J.S., and Ochoa B.L. Development of a new underwater bathymetric laser imaging system: L-Bath. J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol. 17 8 (2000)
22. S.G. Narasimhan, S.K. Nayar, Removing weather effects from monochrome images, in: Proc. CVPR, Hawaii, December, 2001.
23. M. Gupta, S.G. Narasimhan, Y.Y. Schechner, On controlling light transport in poor visibility environments, in: Proc. IEEE CVPR'08, June, 2008.
24. Negahdaripour S., and Lee S. Motion recovery from image sequences using only first order optical flow information. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 9 3 (1992) 163-184
25. Negahdaripour S. Closed form relationship between the two interpretations of a moving plane. J. Opt. Soc. Am. (A) 7 2 (1990) 279-285
26. S. Negahdaripour, P. Firoozfam, P. Sabzmeydani, On processing and mosaicing of forward-scan acoustic video imagery, in: Second Canadian Conf. Computer Robot Vision, British Columbia, CA, May, 2005.
27. Negahdaripour S., Barufaldi C., and Khamene A. Integrated system for robust 6 DOF positioning utilizing new closed-form visual motion estimation methods for planar terrains. IEEE J. Oceanic Eng. 31 3 (2006) 462-469
28. S. Negahdaripour, H. Pirsiavash, H. Sekkati, Integration of motion cues in optical and sonar video imaging for 3-D positioning, in: Proc. IEEE Int. Workshop on Towards Benchmarking Automated Calibration, Orientation, and Surface Reconstruction from Images, Held in Conj. CVPR'07, Minneapolis, MN, June, 2007.
29. Negahdaripour S. Epipolar geometry of opti-acoustic stereo imaging. IEEE Trans. PAMI 20 11 (2007) 1776-1788
30. S. Negahdaripour, H. Pirsiavash, A. Taatian, A geometric approach to solving the correspondence problem in opti-acoustic stereo imaging, in: Proc. UUST'07, Univ. New Hampshire, August, 2007.
31. S. Negahdaripour, A. Taatian, 3-D motion and structure estimation for arbitrary scenes from 2-D optical and sonar video, in: Proc. Oceans'08, Quebec City, Canada, September, 2008.
32. Negahdaripour S., Sekkati H., and Pirsiavash H. Opti-acoustic stereo imaging: On system calibration and 3-D target reconstruction. IEEE Trans. Image Proc. 18 6 (2009) 1203-1214
33. Nelson R., and Aloimonos J. Finding motion parameters from spherical flow fields (or the advantages of having eyes in the back of your head). Biol. Cybern. 58 (1988) 261-273
34. Nister D. An efficient solution to the five-point relative pose problem. IEEE Trans. PAMI 26 6 (2004)
35. H. Sekkati, S. Negahdaripour, 3-D Motion estimation for positioning from 2-D acoustic video imagery, in: Proc. 3rd Iberian Conf. on Pattern Recog. Image Analysis, Girona, Spain, June, 2007.
36. Schechner Y.Y., and Karpel N. Clear underwater vision. Proc. CVPR 1 (2004) 536-543
37. J. Shi, C. Tomasi, Good features to track, in: Proc. IEEE Conf. Comp. Vision and Pattern Recog., 1994, pp. 593-600.
38. Tsai R.Y., and Huang T.S. Uniqueness and estimation of 3-D motion parameters of rigid bodies with curved surfaces. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 6 (1984) 13-27
39. R. Vesetas, G. Manzie, AMI: A 3-D imaging sonar for mine identification in turbid waters, in: Proc. Oceans'01, Honolulu, HI, November, 2001.
40. Wagner R.F., Smith S.W., Sandrik J.M., and Lopez H. Statistics of speckle in ultrasound B-scans. IEEE Trans. Son. Ultrason. 30 (1983) 156-163
41. Young G.S., and Chellappa R. Inherent ambiguities in recovering 3-D motion of a planar surfacefrom a noisy flow field. Int. Conf. Acoust. Speech Signal Proc. 4 (1990) 2197-2200