Carbon and nitrogen status of litterfall, litter decomposition and soil in even-aged larch, red pine and rigitaeda pine plantations

Journal of Plant Research

Volumn 123, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 403-409

  Kim, Choonsig ^a   Jeong, Jaeyeob ^a   Cho, Hyun Seo ^a   Son, Yowhan ^b  

^a Gyeongsang National University   (South Korea)

^b Korea University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Carbon; Needle litter; Nitrogen; Soil carbon; Tree species effects

Indexed keywords

CARBON; NITROGEN; WATER;

AGRICULTURE; ARTICLE; BIOMASS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; LARIX; METABOLISM; PINE; PLANT LEAF; SOIL; TEMPERATURE;

AGRICULTURE; BIOMASS; CARBON; LARIX; NITROGEN; PINUS; PLANT LEAVES; SOIL; TEMPERATURE; WATER;

LARIX; LARIX KAEMPFERI; PINUS DENSIFLORA; PINUS RESINOSA;

EID: 77953960052     PISSN: 09189440     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10265-010-0317-6     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Baker TT III, Lockaby BG, Conner WH, Meiner CE, Stanturf JA, Burke MK (2001) Leaf litter decomposition and nutrient dynamics in four southern forested floodplain communities. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65: 1334-1347.
2. Berg B, Laskowski R (2006) Litter decomposition: a guide to carbon and nutrient turnover. Adv Ecol Res 38: 20-71.
3. Bert D, Danjon D (2006) Carbon concentration variations in the roots stem and crown of mature Pinus pinaster (Ait.). For Ecol Manage 222: 279-295. doi: 10. 1016/j. foreco. 2005. 10. 030.
4. Binkley D (1995) The influence of tree species on forest soils: processes and patterns. In: Mead DJ, Cornforth IS (eds) Proceeding of the trees and soil workshop. Lincoln University Press, Canterbury, pp 1-33.
5. Bray JR, Gorham E (1964) Litter production in forests of the world. Adv Ecol Res 2: 101-157.
6. Bremmer JM, Mulvaney CS (1982) Nitrogen-total. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (eds) Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties, 2nd edn. ASA and SSSA, Madison, pp 595-624.
7. Chen X, Li BL (2003) Change in soil carbon and nutrient storage after human disturbance of a primary Korean pine forest in northeast China. For Ecol Manage 186: 197-206.
8. Finzi AC, van Breemen N, Canham CD (1998) Canopy tree-soil interactions within temperate forests: species effects on soil carbon and nitrogen. Ecol Appl 8: 440-446.
9. Gower ST, Son Y (1992) Differences in soil and leaf litterfall nitrogen dynamics for five forest plantations. Soil Sci Soc Am J 56: 1959-1966.
10. Hansen H, Vesterdal L, Schmidt IK, Gundersen P, Sevel L, Bastrup-Birk A, Pedersen LB, Bille-Hansen J (2009) Litterfall and nutrient in five tree species in a common garden experiment. For Ecol Manage 257: 2133-2144. doi: 10. 1016/j. foreco. 2009. 02. 021.
11. Hwang J, Son Y, Kim C, Yi MJ, Kim ZS, Lee WK, Hong SK (2007) Fine root dynamics in thinned and limed pitch pine and Japanese larch plantations. J Plant Nutr 30: 1821-1839.
12. IPCC (2003) Good practice guidance for land use, land-use change and forestry. IPCC National Greenhouse Inventories Programme, pp 3. 23-3. 68.
13. Jeong J, Kim C, An HC, Cho HS, Choo GC (2009) A comparison of litterfall dynamics in three coniferous plantations of identical age under similar site condition. J Ecol Field Biol 32: 97-102.
14. Kamei J, Pandey HN, Barik SK (2009) Tree species distribution and its impact on soil properties, and nitrogen and phosphorus mineralization in a humid subtropical forest ecosystem of northeastern India. Can J For Res 39: 36-47. doi: 10. 1139/X08-151.
15. Kim C (1999) Aboveground nutrient distribution in pitch pine (Pinus rigida) and Japanese larch (Larix leptolepis) plantations. J Korean For Soc 88: 266-272.
16. 2 efflux in fertilized and unfertilized larch (Larix leptolepis) plantations. Ecol Res 23: 757-763. doi: 10. 1007/s11284-007-0436-2.
17. Kim C, Koo KS, Byun JK (2005) Litterfall and nutrient dynamics in pine (Pinus rigida) and larch (Larix leptolepis) plantations. J Korean For Soc 94: 302-306.
18. Kim C, Son Y, Lee WK, Jeong J, Noh N (2009) Influences of forest tending works on carbon distribution and cycling in a Pinus densiflora S. et Z. stand in Korea. For Ecol Manage 257: 1420-1426. doi: 10. 1016/j. foreco. 2008. 12. 015.
19. Korea Forest Service (2006) Statistical year book of forestry (in Korean). Korea Forest Service, Daejeon City, Korea.
20. Li Q, Moorhead DL, DeForest JL, Henderson R, Chen J, Jensen R (2009) Mixed litter decomposition in a managed Missouri Ozark forest ecosystem. For Ecol Manage 257: 688-694. doi: 10. 1016/j. foreco. 2008. 09. 043.
21. Moore TR, Trofymow JA, Prescott CE, Fyles J, CIDET Working Group, Titus BD (2006) Patterns of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus dynamics in decomposing foliar litter in Canadian forests. Ecosystems 9: 46-62.
22. Polyakova O, Billor N (2007) Impact of deciduous tree species on litterfall quality, decomposition rates and nutrient circulation in pine stands. For Ecol Manage 253: 11-18. doi: 10. 1016/j. foreco. 2007. 06. 049.
23. SAS Institute Inc (1989) SAS/STAT user's guide. Version 6. 4th edn, vol 2. Cary, NC.
24. Son Y, Gower ST (1992) Nitrogen and phosphorus distribution for five plantation species in southwestern Wisconsin. For Ecol Manage 53: 175-193.
25. Son Y, Lee IK (1997) Soil nitrogen mineralization in adjacent stands of larch, pine and oak in central Korea. Ann Sci For 54: 1-8.
26. Soon YK, Abboud S (1991) A comparison of some methods for soil organic carbon determination. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 22: 943-954.
27. Wang Q, Wang S, Zhang J (2009) Assessing the effects of vegetation types on carbon storage fifteen years after reforestation on a Chinese fir site. For Ecol Manage 258: 1437-1441. doi: 10. 1016/j. foreco. 2009. 06. 050.
28. Zhang Q, Wang C, Wang X, Quan X (2009) Carbon concentration variability of 10 Chinese temperate tree species. For Ecol Manage 258: 722-727. doi: 10. 1016/j. foreco. 2009. 05. 009.