Nonlaxative PET/CT colonography: Feasibility, acceptability, and pilot performance in patients at higher risk of colonic neoplasia

Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Volumn 51, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 854-861

  Taylor, Stuart A ^a   Bomanji, Jamshed B ^b   Manpanzure, Levi ^a   Robinson, Charlotte ^a   Groves, Ashley M ^b   Dickson, John ^b   Papathanasiou, Nickolaos D ^b   Greenhalgh, Rebecca ^a   Ell, Peter J ^b   Halligan, Steve ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Colonic polyps diagnosis; Colonography; Computed tomographic methods; Feasibility studies; Fluorodeoxyglucose 18F diagnostic use

Indexed keywords

BARIUM SULFATE; FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F 18; TAGITOL V; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; LAXATIVE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BARIUM ENEMA; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER RISK; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLON CANCER; COLON POLYP; COLONOSCOPY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; CONSENSUS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTESTINE DISTENSION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICIAN; PILOT STUDY; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOLOGIST; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT ATTITUDE; RADIOGRAPHY; RISK; SCINTISCANNING;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAXATIVES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PILOT PROJECTS; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK;

EID: 77953953881     PISSN: 01615505     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.109.072728     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Sosna J, Morrin MM, Kruskal JB, Lavin PT, Rosen MP, Raptopoulos V. CT colonography of colorectal polyps: a metaanalysis. AJR. 2003;181:1593-1598.
2. Steffes CP, Sugawa C, Wilson RF, Hayward SR. Oxygen saturation monitoring during endoscopy. Surg Endosc. 1990;4:175-178.
3. Flashman K, O'Leary DP, Senapati A, Thompson MR. The Department of Health's "two week standard" for bowel cancer: is it working? Gut. 2004;53:387-391.
4. Ristvedt SL, McFarland EG, Weinstock LB, Thyssen EP. Patient preferences for CT colonography, conventional colonoscopy, and bowel preparation. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:578-585.
5. Heymann TD, Chopra K, Nunn E, Coulter L, Westaby D, Murray-Lyon IM. Bowel preparation at home: prospective study of adverse effects in elderly people. BMJ. 1996;313:727-728.
6. Callstrom MR, Johnson CD, Fletcher JG, et al. CT colonography without cathartic preparation: feasibility study. Radiology. 2001;219:693-698.
7. Johnson CD, Manduca A, Fletcher JG, et al. Noncathartic CT colonography with stool tagging: performance with and without electronic stool subtraction. AJR. 2008;190:361-366.
8. Iannaccone R, Laghi A, Catalano C, et al. Computed tomographic colonography without cathartic preparation for the detection of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology. 2004;127:1300-1311.
9. Liedenbaum MH, de Vries AH, Gouw CI, et al. CT colonography with minimal bowel preparation: evaluation of tagging quality, patient acceptance and diagnostic accuracy in two iodine-based preparation schemes. Eur Radiol. 2010;20:367-376.
10. 18F-FDG uptake: incidence, localization patterns, and clinical significance. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:758-762.
11. Kayani I, Groves AM, Syed R, Bomanji J. Combined F-18 FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the diagnosis of colonic polyps: the potential and limitations of the technique. Clin Nucl Med. 2005;30:116-117.
12. 18F-FDG PET of colon polyps: potential technique for selective detection of cancer and precancerous lesions. AJR. 2007;188:130-138.
13. Mainenti PP, Salvatore B, D'Antonio D, et al. PET/CT colonography in patients with colorectal polyps: a feasibility study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007;34:1594-1603.
14. Veit-Haibach P, Kuehle CA, Beyer T, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of colorectal cancer staging with whole-body PET/CT colonography. JAMA. 2006;296:2590-2600.
15. Veit P, Kuhle C, Beyer T, et al. Whole body positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) tumour staging with integrated PET/CT colonography: technical feasibility and first experiences in patients with colorectal cancer. Gut. 2006;55:68-73.
16. Dachman AH. Advice for optimizing colonic distention and minimizing risk of perforation during CT colonography. Radiology. 2006;239:317-321.
17. Zalis ME, Barish MA, Choi JR, et al. CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal. Radiology. 2005;236:3-9.
18. O'Brien MJ, Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, et al. The National Polyp Study. Patient and polyp characteristics associated with high-grade dysplasia in colorectal adenomas. Gastroenterology. 1990;98:371-379.
19. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:2191-2200.
20. Salmon P, Shah R, Berg S, Williams C. Evaluating customer satisfaction with colonoscopy. Endoscopy. 1994;26:342-346.
21. Holemans JA, Matson MB, Hughes JA, Seed P, Rankin SC. A comparison of air, CO2 and an air/CO2 mixture as insufflation agents for double contrast barium enema. Eur Radiol. 1998;8:274-276.
22. von WC. Halligan S, Atkin WS, Lilford RJ, Morton D, Wardle J. Choosing between CT colonography and colonoscopy in the diagnostic context: a qualitative study of influences on patient preferences. Health Expect. 2009;12:18-26.
23. Liedenbaum MH, de Vries AH, van Rijn AF, et al. CT colonography with limited bowel preparation for the detection of colorectal neoplasia in an FOBT positive screening population. Abdom Imaging. November 4, 2009 [Epub ahead of print].
24. Ng CS, Doyle TC, Pinto EM, et al. Evaluation of CT in identifying colorectal carcinoma in the frail and disabled patient. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:2988-2997.
25. Whiteford MH, Whiteford HM, Yee LF, et al. Usefulness of FDG-PET scan in the assessment of suspected metastatic or recurrent adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:759-767.
26. 18F-FDG PET detection of colonic adenomas. J Nucl Med. 2001;42:989-992.
27. Drenth JP, Nagengast FM, Oyen WJ. Evaluation of (pre-) malignant colonic abnormalities: endoscopic validation of FDG-PET findings. Eur J Nucl Med. 2001;28:1766-1769.
28. Francis DL, Freeman A, Visvikis D, et al. In vivo imaging of cellular proliferation in colorectal cancer using positron emission tomography. Gut. 2003;52:1602-1606.
29. 18F-FDG PET in a multicenter phase I study of patients with advanced gastrointestinal malignancies. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:1646-1654.
30. 18F-FDG PET. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:268-276.
31. Johnson CD, Harmsen WS, Wilson LA, et al. Prospective blinded evaluation of computed tomographic colonography for screen detection of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology. 2003;125:311-319.
32. Baker ME, Bogoni L, Obuchowski NA, et al. Computer-aided detection of colorectal polyps: can it improve sensitivity of less-experienced readers? Preliminary findings. Radiology. 2007;245:140-149.
33. Nagata K, Ota Y, Okawa T, Endo S, Kudo SE. PET/CT colonography for the preoperative evaluation of the colon proximal to the obstructive colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:882-890.
34. Johnson CD, Chen MH, Toledano AY, et al. Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1207-1217.