Context-specific marker-assisted selection for improved grain yield in elite soybean populations

Crop Science

Volumn 50, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 1196-1206

  Sebastian, S A ^a   Streit, L G ^b   Stephens, P A ^c   Thompson, J A ^c   Hedges, B R ^c   Fabrizius, M A ^c   Soper, J F ^a   Schmidt, D H ^a   Kallem, R L ^b   Hinds, M A ^a   Feng, L ^a   Hoeck, J A ^a  

^a PIONEER HI BRED INTERNATIONAL INC   (United States)

^b Dallas Center   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GLYCINE MAX; LONCHOCARPUS GLAUCIFOLIUS;

EID: 77953936341     PISSN: 0011183X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2009.02.0078     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Beavis, W.D. 1994. The power and deceit of QTL experiments: Lessons from comparative QTL studies. p. 250-266. In Proc. Corn Sorghum Ind. Res. Conf., 7-8 Dec. 1994, Chicago, IL. Am. Seed Trade Assoc., Washington, DC.
2. Bernardo, R. 2008. Molecular markers and selection for complex traits in plants: Learning from the last 20 years. Crop Sci. 48:1649-1664.
3. Bernardo, R., and J. Yu. 2007. Prospects for genomewide selection for quantitative traits in maize. Crop Sci. 47:1082-1090.
4. Bonnett, D.G., G.J. Rebetzke, and W. Spielmeyer. 2005. Strategies for efficient implementation of molecular markers in wheat breeding. Mol. Breed. 15:75-85.
5. Fasoula, V.A., and H.R. Boerma. 2005. Divergent selection at ultralow plant density for seed protein and oil content within soybean cultivars. Field Crops Res. 91:217-229.
6. Feng, L., S. Sebastian, S. Smith, and M. Cooper. 2006. Temporal trends in SSR allele frequencies associated with long term selection of yield of maize. Maydica 51:293-300.
7. Gordon, I.L., and D.E. Byth. 1972. Comparisons among strains of the tobacco cultivar Hicks illustrating variability within a single cultivar. Queensland J. Agric. Anim. Sci. 29:255-264.
8. Guzman, P.S., B.W. Diers, D.J. Neece, S.K. St. Martin, A.R. LeRoy, C.R. Grau, T.J. Hughes, and R.L. Nelson. 2007. QTL associated with yield in three backcross-derived populations of soybean. Crop Sci. 47:111-122.
9. Hallauer, A.R., and J.B. Miranda. 1981. p. 32. Quantitative genetics in maize breeding. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames, IA.
10. Hanafey, M.K., S.A. Sebastian, and S.V. Tingey. 1998. Method to identify genetic markers that are linked to agronomically important genes. U.S. Patent 5 746 023. Date issued: 5 May.
11. Higgs, R.L., and W.A. Russell. 1968. Genetic variation in quantitative characters in maize inbred lines, I. Variation among and within Corn Belt seed sources of six inbreds. Crop Sci. 8:345-348.
12. th, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. 26 Sept.-1 Oct. 2004. Regional Inst. Ltd., Gosford, NSW, Australia.
13. Holland, J.B. 2007. Genetic architecture of complex traits in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 10:156-161.
14. Lubberstedt, T., A.E. Melchinger, S. Fahr, and D. Klein. 2008. QTL mapping in testcrosses of flint lines of maize: III. Comparison across populations for forage traits. Crop Sci. 38:1278-1289.
15. Meuwissen, T.H.E., B.J. Hayes, and M.E. Goddard. 2001. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157:1819-1829.
16. Moreau, L., A. Charcosset, F. Hospital, and A. Gallais. 1998. Marker-assisted selection efficiency in populations of finite size. Genetics 148:1353-1365.
17. Orf, J.H., K. Chase, T. Jarvik, L.M. Mansur, P.B. Cregan, F.R. Adler, and K.G. Lark. 1999. Genetics of soybean agronomic traits I. Comparison of three related recombinant inbred populations. Crop Sci. 39:1642-1651.
18. Pilet, M.L., G. Duplan, M. Archipiano, P. Barret, C. Baron, R. Horvais, X. Tanguy, M.O. Lucas, M. Renard, and R. Delourme. 2001. Stability of QTL for field resistance to blackleg across two genetic backgrounds in oilseed rape. Crop Sci. 41:197-205.
19. Podlich, D. W., C. R. Winkler, and M. Cooper. 2004. Mapping as you go: An effective approach for marker-assisted selection of complex traits. Crop Sci. 44:1560-1571.
20. Reyna, N., and C.H. Sneller. 2001. Evaluation of marker-assisted introgression of yield QTL alleles into adapted soybean. Crop Sci. 41:1317-1321.
21. Robertson-Hoyt, L.A., M.P. Jines, P.J. Balint-Kurti, C.E. Klein-schmidt, D.G. White, G.A. Payne, C.M. Maragos, T.L. Mol-nár, and J.B. Holland. 2006. QTL mapping for Fusarium ear rot and Fumonisin contamination resistance in two maizepopulations. Crop Sci 46:1734-1743.
22. SAS Institute. 2001. SAS/STAT user's guide, v 9.1. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC.
23. Sebastian, S.A., S.V. Tingey, and M.K. Hanafey. 1995. Method to identify genetic markers that are linked to agronomically important genes. U.S. Patent 5 437 697. Date issued: 1 August.
24. Smalley, M.D., W.R. Fehr, S.R. Cianzio, F. Han, S.A. Sebastian, and L.G. Streit. 2004. Quantitative trait loci for soybean seed yield in elite and plant introduction germplasm. Crop Sci. 44:436-442.
25. Tokatlidis, I.S., J.T. Tsialtas, I.N. Xynias, E. Tamoutsidis, and M. Irakli. 2004. Variation within a bread wheat cultivar for grain yield, protein content, carbon isotope discrimination and ash content. Field Crops Res. 86:33-42.
26. Tuinstra, M.R., G. Ejeta, and P.B. Goldsbrough. 1997. Heterogeneous inbred family (HIF) analysis: A method for developing near-isogenic lines that differ at quantitative trait loci. Theor. Appl. Genet. 95:1005-1011.
27. Xu, Y., and J.H. Crouch. 2008. Marker-assisted selection in plant breeding: From publications to practice. Crop Sci. 48:391-407.