IT programs in high schools: Lessons from the Cisco networking academy program

Communications of the ACM

Volumn 53, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 138-141

  Dennis, Alan R ^a,b   Duffy, Thomas M ^a,c   Cakir, Hasan ^d  

^a Department of Information Systems ^*  (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d GAZI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITY COLLEGE; GRADE POINT AVERAGE; HIGH SCHOOL; KEY COMPONENT; LEARNING ACTIVITY; NETWORK ENGINEERS; PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS; STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT; STUDENT LEARNING; TASK ANALYSIS; TECHNICAL SUPPORT;

BIOGRAPHIES; CURRICULA; JOB ANALYSIS; STANDARDS; STUDENTS;

SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

EID: 77953919986     PISSN: 00010782     EISSN: 15577317     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1785414.1785452     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Akbulut, A.Y., Looney, C.L., and Motwani, J. Combating the decline in Information Systems majors: The role of instrumental assistance. J. Computer Information Systems 48, 4. (2008), 84-93
2. Brophy, J. and Good, T.L., Teacher Behavior and Student Achievement, in Handbook of Research on Teaching, M.C. Wittrock, Editor. 1986, Macmillan, New York. 328-375.
3. Crombie, G. and Abarbanel, T., Bridging the gender gap in high-technology education. AMSSP Bulletin 84, 618, (2000), 64-73.
4. Granger, M.J., Dick, G., Jacobson, C.M. Van Slyke, C Information systems enrollments: Challenges and strategies, J. Information Systems Education 18, 3, (2007), 303-311.
5. Hannaway, J. and Talbert, J.E., Bringing context into effective school research: Urban-suburban differences. Educational Administration Quarterly 29, 2, (1993), 164-186.
6. Kuncel, N.R., Crede, M., and Thomas, L.L., The validity of self-reported grade point averages, class ranks, and test scores: A meta-analysis and review of the literature. Review of Educational Research 75, 1, (2005), 63-82.
7. Panko, R.R. IT employment prospects: Beyond the dotcom bubble. European Journal of Information Systems,17, (2008), 182-197.
8. Porter, M.E. and Kramer, M.R. The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy. Harvard Susihess Review 80,12, (2002), 56-69.
9. Slonim, J., Scully, S., and McAllister, M. Crossroads for Canadian CS Enrollment. Comm. ACM 51,10, (Oct 2008), 66-70.
10. Verstegen, DA and King, RA, The relationship between school spending and student achievement a review and analysis of 35 years of production function research. Journal of Education Finance 24,2, (1998), 243-262.
11. Zimmerman, B.J. and Martinez-Pons, M., Perceptions ofefficacy and strategy use in the self-regulation of learning, in Student Perceptions in the Classroom D.H. Schunkand J.L Meece, Editors. 1992, Lawrence Ertbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. 185-207.