Popper and P300: Can the view ever be falsified that P3 latency is a specific indicator of stimulus evaluation?

Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 121, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 1371-1372

  Verleger, Rolf ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LÜBECK   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUDITORY STIMULATION; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; HUMAN; LETTER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; STIMULUS; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS, P300; HUMANS; REACTION TIME;

EID: 77953915775     PISSN: 13882457     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.01.038     Document Type: Letter

References (6)

1. Dehaene S., Sergent C., Changeux J.-P. A neuronal network model linking subjective reports and objective physiological data during conscious perception. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003, 100:8520-8525.
2. Duncan C.C., Barry R.J., Connolly J.F., Fischer C., Michie P.T., Näätänen R., et al. Event-related potentials in clinical research: guidelines for eliciting, recording, and quantifying mismatch negativity, P300, and N400. Clin Neurophysiol 2009, 120:1883-1908.
3. Duncan-Johnson C.C., Kopell B.S. The Stroop effect: brain potentials localize the source of interference. Science 1981, 214:938-940.
4. Näätänen R. Event-related brain potentials in research of cognitive processes - a classification of components. Knowledge-aided information processing in human beings 1987, 241-273. North-Holland, Amsterdam. E. van der Meer, J. Hoffmann (Eds.).
5. Verleger R. On the utility of P3 latency as an index of mental chronometry. Psychophysiology 1997, 34:131-156.
6. Verleger R., Jaśkowski P., Wascher E. Evidence for an integrative role of P3b in linking reaction to perception. J Psychophysiol 2005, 19:165-181.