A prospective, randomized, comparative trial evaluating respiratory depression during patient-controlled versus anesthesiologist-administered propofol-remifentanil sedation for elective colonoscopy

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volumn 72, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 112-117

  Mandel, Jeff E ^a   Lichtenstein, Gary R ^a   Metz, David C ^a   Ginsberg, Gregory G ^a   Kochman, Michael L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FENTANYL; FENTANYL PLUS MIDAZOLAM; MIDAZOLAM; PROPOFOL; PROPOFOL PLUS REMIFENTANIL; REMIFENTANIL; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; INTRAVENOUS ANESTHETIC AGENT; OXYGEN; PIPERIDINE DERIVATIVE;

ADULT; AIRWAY RESISTANCE; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ARTERIAL OXYGEN SATURATION; ARTICLE; BISPECTRAL INDEX; BREATHING RATE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLONOSCOPY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RESPIRATION DEPRESSION; SEDATION; SPIROMETRY; AGED; ANESTHESIOLOGY; BLOOD; CHEMICALLY INDUCED; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONSCIOUS SEDATION; DOSE RESPONSE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT CONTROLLED ANALGESIA; PROCEDURES; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RESPIRATORY FAILURE; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL;

ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTERS; ADULT; AGED; ANALGESIA, PATIENT-CONTROLLED; ANESTHESIOLOGY; ANESTHETICS, INTRAVENOUS; COLONOSCOPY; CONSCIOUS SEDATION; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OXYGEN; PIPERIDINES; PROPOFOL; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RESPIRATORY INSUFFICIENCY;

EID: 77953912630     PISSN: 00165107     EISSN: 10976779     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.01.031     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Jemal A., Siegel R., Ward E., et al. Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin 58 (2008) 71-96
2. Cohen L.B., Wecsler J.S., Gaetano J.N., et al. Endoscopic sedation in the United States: results from a nationwide survey. Am J Gastroenterol 101 (2006) 967-974
3. Inadomi J.M., Gunnarsson C.L., Rizzo J.A., et al. Projected growth rate of anesthesiologist-delivered sedation in colonoscopy and EGD in the United States: 2009-2011. Gastrointest Endosc AB111 (2009)
4. Rex D.K. Review article: moderate sedation for endoscopy: sedation regimens for non-anaesthesiologists. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 24 (2006) 163-171
5. Aisenberg J., Cohen L.B., and Piorkowski J.D. Propofol use under the direction of trained gastroenterologists: an analysis of the medicolegal implications. Am J Gastroenterol 102 (2007) 707-713
6. Mandel J.E., Tanner J.W., Lichtenstein G.R., et al. A randomized, controlled, double-blind trial of patient-controlled sedation with propofol/remifentanil versus midazolam/fentanyl for colonoscopy. Anesth Analg 106 (2008) 434-439
7. Budnyk S.A. Judgment and risk to patient in study design. Anesth Analg 107 (2008) 724-725 author reply 725-6
8. Bruhn J., Myles P.S., Sneyd R., et al. Depth of anaesthesia monitoring: what's available, what's validated and what's next?. Br J Anaesth 97 (2006) 85-94
9. Stonell C.A., Leslie K., and Absalom A.R. Effect-site targeted patient-controlled sedation with propofol: comparison with anaesthetist administration for colonoscopy. Anaesthesia 61 (2006) 240-247
10. Schnider T.W., Minto C.F., Gambus P.L., et al. The influence of method of administration and covariates on the pharmacokinetics of propofol in adult volunteers. Anesthesiology 88 (1998) 1170-1182
11. Minto C.F., Schnider T.W., Egan T.D., et al. Influence of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. I. Model development. Anesthesiology 86 (1997) 10-23
12. Bouillon T.W., Bruhn J., Radulescu L., et al. Pharmacodynamic interaction between propofol and remifentanil regarding hypnosis, tolerance of laryngoscopy, bispectral index, and electroencephalographic approximate entropy. Anesthesiology 100 (2004) 1353-1372
13. Mandel JE. Clinical evaluation of a method for producing probability ramp sedation with propofol and remifentanil during colonoscopy. Paper presented at: Annual meeting of the Society for Technology in Anesthesia; January 13-14, 2009; San Antonio, TX. Available at: http://www.anestech.org/media/Publications/Annual_2009/2009_STA_Abstracts.pdf
14. Brainard D.H. The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spat Vis 10 (1997) 433-436
15. Atkins J.H., and Mandel J.E. Recent advances in patient-controlled sedation. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 21 (2008) 759-765
16. Drews F.A., Syroid N., Agutter J., et al. Drug delivery as control task: improving performance in a common anesthetic task. Hum Factors 48 (2006) 85-94
17. Macario A., Scibetta W.C., Navarro J., et al. Analgesia for labor pain: a cost model. Anesthesiology 92 (2000) 841-850