Optimizing the turning process toward an ideal surface roughness target

Journal of Industrial Technology

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 1-11

  Kirby, E Daniel ^a  

^a CENTRAL CONNECTICUT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTROLLED PARAMETER; CUTTING TIME; FEED-RATES; INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY; OPTIMAL LEVEL; OUTPUT PARAMETERS; PRODUCTION PERSONNEL; QUALITY CHARACTERISTIC; QUALITY TARGETS; SIGNAL TO NOISE; TAGUCHI PARAMETER DESIGN; TARGET SURFACE; TURNING OPERATIONS; TURNING PROCESS;

METAL ANALYSIS; PRODUCTIVITY; SURFACE PROPERTIES; SURFACE ROUGHNESS; TARGETS; TURNING;

OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 77953892497     PISSN: None     EISSN: 08826404     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Cesarone, J. (2001). The power of Taguchi. IIE Solutions 33(11), 36-40.
2. Chinnam, R. B. (2001). Intelligent quality controllers for on-line parameter design. In J. Wang et al (Eds.), Computational intelligence in manufacturing handbook. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
3. Davis, J. R., ed. (1989). Metals Handbook, v 16: Machining. Materials Park, OH: ASM International.
4. Feng, C.-X., & Wang, X.-F. (2003). Surface roughness predictive modeling: neural networks versus regression. IIE Transactions 35(1), 11-27.
5. Fowlkes, W. Y. & Creveling, C. M. (1996). Engineering Methods for Robust Product Design Using Taguchi Methods in Technology and Product Development. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.
6. Gaitonde, V. N., Karnik, S. R., & Davim, J. P. (2008). Multiperformance optimization in turning of free-machining steel using Taguchi method and utility concept. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 18(3), 231-6.
7. Gökkayaa, H., & Nalbant, M. (2007). The effects of cutting tool geometry and processing parameters on the surface roughness of AISI 1030 steel. Materials & Design, 28(2), 717-721.
8. Hascalik, A. & Caydas, U. (2008). Optimization of turning parameters for surface roughness and tool life based on the Taguchi method. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 38(9-10), 896-903.
9. Jayant, A. & Kumar, V. (2008). Prediction of surface roughness in cnc turning operation using Taguchi design of experiments. Journal of the Institution of Engineers (India), 88PR(203), 19-25.
10. Kandananond, K. (2009). Characterization of FDB sleeve surface roughness using the Taguchi approach. European Journal of Scientific Research, 33(2), 330-7.
11. Kirby, E. D., Zhang, Z., & Chen, J. C. (2004). Development of an accelerometer-based surface roughness prediction system in turning operations using multiple regression techniques. Journal of Industrial Technology, 20(4). Retrieved from http://www.nait.org/jit/Articles/kirby110804.pdf.
12. Knight, T. (1999). Simplified Taguchi DOE [Review of Nutek Inc. software Qualitek-4]. Quality Digest, January 1999. Retrieved from http://www.qualitydigest.com/jan99/html/body_ software.html.
13. Lalwani, D.I. (2008). Experimental investigations of cutting parameters influence on cutting forces and surface roughness in finish hard turning of MDN250 steel. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 206(1-3), 167-179.
14. Lan, T.-S. & Wang, M.-Y. (2009). Competitive parameter optimization of multi-quality CNC turning. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 41, 820-6.
15. Lascoe, O. D., Nelson, C. A., & Porter, H. W. (1973). Machine Shop Operations and Setups. Alsip, IL: American Technical Publishers.
16. Lin, C. L. (2004). Use of the Taguchi method and grey relational analysis to optimize turning operations with multiple performance characteristics. Materials and Manufacturing Processes, 19(2), 209-220.
17. Lin, S. C., & Chang, M. F. (1998). Study on the effects of vibrations on the surface finish using a surface topography simulation model for turning. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 38(7), 763-782.
18. Lynch, M. (2003). How consistent are your inserts? Modern Machine Shop. Retrieved on February 4, 2009: http://www.mmsonline.com/columns/how-consistent-are-your-inserts.aspx.
19. Manna, A., & Bhattacharyya, B. (2004). Investigation for optimal parametric combination for achieving better surface finish during turning of Al /SiC-MMC. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 23(9-10), 658-665.
20. National Research Council. (2002). Approaches To Improve Engineering Design. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
21. Nutek, Inc. (2006). Qualitek version 4.75 [computer software]. Bloomfield Hills, MI: Nutek, Inc.
22. Oberg, E. et al. (2008). Machinery's Handbook 28th Ed. New York: Industrial Press.
23. Özel, T., Hsu, T.-K., & Zeren, E. (2005). Effects of cutting edge geometry, workpiece hardness, feed rate and cutting speed on surface roughness and forces in finish turning of hardened AISI H13 steel. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 25(3-4), 262-269.
24. Peterka, P. (2005) The Six Sigma method and design of experiments, Six Sigma Articles and Six Sigma White Papers. Retrieved from http://www.6sigma.us/six-sigma-article-design-of-experiments.php.
25. Prasad, M. V. R. D., Janardhana, G. R., & Rao, D. H. (2009). Experimental investigation to study the influence of process parameters in dry machining. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 4(4), 91-4.
26. Roy, R. K. (2001). Design of Experiments Using the Taguchi Approach: 16 Steps to Product and Process Improvement. New York: Wiley.
27. Schimmel RJ, Manjunathaiah J, Endres WJ (2000). Edge radius variability and force measurement considerations. ASME Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 122, 590-593.
28. Tabenkin, A. (1999). Surface finish: A machinist's tool. A design necessity. Modern Machine Shop, March 1999. Retrieved from http://www.mmsonline.com/articles/surface-finish-a-machinist39s-tool-a-design-necessity.aspx.