Comparing general-purpose and domain-specific languages: An empirical study

Computer Science and Information Systems

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 247-264

  Kosar, Tomaž ^a   Oliveira, Nuno ^b   Mernik, Marjan ^a   Pereira, Maria João Varanda ^c   Črepinšek, Matej ^a   da Cruz, Daniela ^b   Henriques, Pedro Rangel ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARIBOR   (Slovenia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINHO   (Portugal)

^c INSTITUTO POLITÉCNICO DE BRAGANÇA   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Domain specific languages; Empirical software engineering; General purpose languages; Program comprehension

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953884044     PISSN: 18200214     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2298/CSIS1002247K     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Mernik, M., Heering, J., Sloane, A.M.: When and how to develop domain-specific languages. ACM Computing Surveys. 37(4) (December 2005) 316-344
2. Deursen, A.v., Klint, P.: Little languages: Little maintenance? Journal of Software Maintenance 10 (1998) 75-92
3. Kosar, T., Martínez López, P.E., Barrientos, P.A., Mernik, M.: A preliminary study on various implementation approaches of domain-specific language. Information and Software Technology 50(5) (2008) 390-405
4. Živanov, v., Rakić, P., Hajduković, M.: Using code generation approach in developing kiosk applications. Journal on Computer Science and Information Systems 5(1) (2008) 41-59
5. Sprinkle, J., Mernik, M., Tolvanen, J-P., Spinellis, D.: What Kinds of Nails Need a Domain-Specific Hammer? IEEE Software, 26(4) (2009) 15-18
6. Wile, D.S.: Supporting the DSL spectrum. Journal of Computing and Information Technology 9(4) (2001) 263-287
7. van Deursen, A., Klint, P., Visser, J.: Domain-specific languages: an annotated bibliography. ACM SIGPLAN Notices 35 (2000) 26-36
8. Hudak, P.: Building domain-specific embedded languages. ACM Computing Surveys 28(4) (June 1996) 196-202
9. Hudak, P.: Modular domain specific languages and tools. In: ICSR '98: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Software Reuse, Washington, DC, USA, IEEE Computer Society (1998)
10. Kieburtz, R.B., Mckinney, L., Bell, J.M., Hook, J., Kotov, A., Lewis, J., Oliva, D.P., Sheard, T., Smith, I., Walton, L.: A software engineering experiment in software component generation. In: ICSE '96: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on Software engineering, Washington, DC, USA, IEEE Computer Society (1996) 542-552
11. Sirer, E.G., Bershad, B.N.: Using production grammars in software testing. In: Proceedings of the 2nd conference on Domain-specific languages, New York, NY, USA, ACM (1999) 1-13
12. Kolovos, D.S., Paige, R.F., Kelly, T., Polack, F.A.C.: Requirements for domainspecific languages. In: Proc. 1st ECOOP Workshop on Domain-Specific Program Development (DSPD 2006), Nantes, France (July 2006)
13. Consel, C., Latry, F., Réveillère, L., Cointe, P.: A generative programming approach to developing DSL compilers. In Gluck, R., Lowry, M., eds.: Fourth International Conference on Generative Programming and Component Engineering (GPCE). Volume 3676 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Tallinn, Estonia, Springer-Verlag (September 2005) 29-46
14. Jackson, M.: Problem frames and software engineering. Information and Software Technology 47(14) (November 2005) 903-912
15. Aurum, A., Wohlin, C.: Engineering and Managing Software Requirements. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., Secaucus, NJ, USA (2005)
16. Gray, J., Fisher, K., Consel, C., Karsai, G., Mernik, M., Tolvanen, J.P.: DSLs: the good, the bad, and the ugly. In: OOPSLA Companion '08: Companion to the 23rd ACM SIGPLAN conference on Object-oriented programming systems languages and applications, New York, NY, USA, ACM (2008) 791-794
17. Krueger, C.W.: Software reuse. ACM Computing Surveys 24(2) (June 1992) 131-183
18. Javed, F., Mernik, M., Bryant, B., Sprague, A.: An unsupervised incremental learning algorithm for domain-specific language development. Applied Artificial Intelligence 22(7) (2008) 707-729
19. Wu, H., Gray, J., Mernik, M.: Grammar-driven generation of domain-specific language debuggers. Software Practice and Experience 38(10) (2008) 1073-1103
20. Herndon, R.M., Berzins, V.A.: The realizable benefits of a language prototyping language. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 14(6) (1988) 803-809
21. Green, T., Petre, M.: Usability analysis of visual programming environments: a "cognitive dimensions" framework. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 7(2) (1996) 131-174
22. Blackwell, A., Britton, C., Cox, A., Green, T.R.G., Gurr, C., Kadoda, G., Kutar, M., Loomes, M., Nehaniv, C., Petre, M., Roast, C., Roe, C., Wong, A., Young, R.: Cognitive dimensions of notations: Design tools for cognitive technology. In: Cognitive Technology: Instruments of Mind. Springer-Verlag (2001) 325-341 Tomaž Kosar, Nuno Oliveira, Marjan Mernik, Maria João Varanda Pereira, Matej Črepinšek, Daniela da Cruz, and Pedro Rangel Henriques
23. Green, T.R.G., Blandford, A.E., Church, L., Roast, C.R., Clarke, S.: Cognitive dimensions: achievements, new directions, and open questions. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing 17(4) (August 2006) 328-365
24. Basili, V., Shull, F., Lanubile, F.: Building knowledge through families of experiments. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 25(4) (1999) 456-473
25. Carver, J., Jaccheri, L., Morasca S., Shull F.: A checklist for integrating student empirical studies with research and teaching goals. Empirical Software Engineering 15(1) 2010 35-59
26. Blackwell, A.: Ten years of cognitive dimensions in visual languages and computing: Guest editor's introduction to special issue. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 17(4) (2006) 285-287
27. Yang, S., Burnett, M., DeKoven, E., Zloof, M.: Representation design benchmarks: a design-time aid for VPL navigable static representations. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 8(5/6) (1997) 563-599
28. Peyton Jones, S., Blackwell, A., Burnett, M.: A user-centred approach to functions in excel. In: Proceedings of the eighth ACM SIGPLAN international conference on Functional programming. (2003) 165-176
29. Antkiewicz, M., Czarnecki, K., Stephan, M.: Engineering of framework-specific modeling languages. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 35 (6) (2009) 795-824
30. Kosar, T., Mernik, M., Črepinšek, M., Henriques, P.R., Cruz, D.d., Varanda Pereira, M.J., Oliveira, N.: Influence of domain-specific notation to program understanding. In: Proceedings of 2nd IMCSIT Workshop on Advances in Programming Languages (WAPL'09), Mra{ogonek}gowo, Poland (October 2009) 675 - 682
31. Dot: Graph description language, available at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DOTlanguage
32. Varanda Pereira, M.J., Mernik, M., Cruz, D.d., Henriques, P.R.: Program comprehension for domain-specific languages. Journal on Computer Science and Information Systems 5(2) (2008) 1-17
33. XAML: Extensible application markup language, available at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ExtensibleApplicationMarkupLanguage
34. C# Forms, available at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WindowsForms
35. Shull, F., Carver, J., Vegas, S., Juristo, N.: The role of replications in empirical software engineering. Empirical Software Engineering 13(2) (2008) 211-218
36. Weinberg, G.M.: The Psychology of Computer Programming. Van Nostrand Reinhold (1971)
37. A. Blackwell. Psychological issues in end-user programming. In H. Lieberman, F. Paterno, and V. Wulf, editors, End User Development Springer (2006) 9-30
38. Lewis, C., Olson, G.: Can principles of cognition lower the barriers to programming? In: 2nd workshop on Empirical Studies of Programmers. (1987) 248 - 263