Influence of domain-specific notation to program Understanding

Proceedings of the International Multiconference on Computer Science and Information Technology, IMCSIT '09

Volumn 4, Issue , 2009, Pages 675-682

  Kosar, Tomaž ^a   Mernik, Marjan ^a   Črepinšek, Matej ^a   Henriques, Pedro Rangel ^b   Da Cruz, Danielaqs ^b   Pereira, Maria João Varanda ^c   Oliveira, Nuno ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARIBOR   (Slovenia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINHO   (Portugal)

^c INSTITUTO POLITÉCNICO DE BRAGANÇA   (Portugal)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMONLY USED; COMPARISON RESULT; DESCRIPTION LANGUAGES; DOMAIN SPECIFIC; DOMAIN SPECIFIC LANGUAGES; EMPIRICAL STUDIES; END-USERS; IMPLEMENTATION APPROACH; LINES OF CODE; OPEN SOURCES; PROBLEM DOMAIN; PROGRAM UNDERSTANDING;

COMPUTER SCIENCE; GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; LIBRARIES; PROBLEM ORIENTED LANGUAGES;

PROBLEM SOLVING;

EID: 77953896703     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/IMCSIT.2009.5352767     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. V. Basili and F. Shull and F. Lanubile, Building Knowledge through Families of Experiments, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 25(4) 456-473, 1999.
2. R. Brooks, Using a behavioral theory of program comprehension in software engineering, In Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Software engineering, Piscataway, NJ, USA, IEEE Press 196-201, 1978.
3. J. Carver, L. Jaccheri, S. Morasca and F. Shull, A Checklist for Integrating Student Empirical Studies with Research and Teaching Goals, To appear in Empirical Software Engineering, doi: 10.1007/s10664-009-9109-9.
4. A. van Deursen, and P. Klint, Domain-Specific Language Design Requires Feature Descriptions, Journal of Computing and Information Technology 10(1) 1-17, 2002.
5. Dot - Graph Description Language, Available at: http://en.wikipedia.org/ wiki/DOT-language.
6. GraphViz - Graph Visualization Software, Available at: http://www.graphviz.org/.
7. T. Green and M. Petre, Usability analysis of visual programming environments: a "cognitive dimensions" framework, Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 7(2) 131-174, 1996.
8. T. Kosar, P. E. Martínez López, P. A. Barrientos and M. Mernik, A Preliminary Study on Various Implementation Approaches of Domain-Specific Language, Information And Software Technology 50(5) 390-405, 2008.
9. M. Mernik and J. Heering and A. Sloane, When and How to Develop Domain-Specific Languages, ACM Computing Surveys 37(4) 316-344, dec 2005.
10. Categorized Lists of Computer Programming Languages, Available at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List-of-programming-languages.
11. Collection On Computer Programming Languages, Available at: http://www.people.ku.edu/nkinners/LangList/Extras/langlist.htm.
12. L. Prechelt, An Empirical Comparison of Seven Programming Languages, IEEE Computer 33(10) 23-29, 2000.
13. F. Shull, J. Carver, S. Vegas and N. Juristo, The Role of Replications in Empirical Software Engineering, Empirical Software Engineering 13(2) 211-218, 2008.
14. M. A. Storey, Theories, methods and tools in program comprehension: Past present and future, In Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Program Comprehension (IPWC'05), pp. 181-191, 2005.
15. M. J. Varanda Pereira, M. Mernik, D. da Cruz and P. R. Henriques Program Comprehension for Domain-Specific Languages, Journal on Computer Science and Information Systems, 5(2) 1-17, dec 2008.
16. A. Walenstein, Theory-based Analysis of Cognitive Support in Software Comprehension Tools, In Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Program Comprehension (IWPC'02), pp. 75-84, 2002.
17. Ž. Živanov, P. Rakić and M. Hajduković Using Code Generation Approach in Developing Kiosk Applications, Journal on Computer Science and Information Systems, 5(1) 41-59, jun 2008.