On the evolution of sexual reproduction in hosts coevolving with multiple parasites

Evolution

Volumn 64, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1644-1656

  Mostowy, Rafal ^a,b   Salathé, Marcel ^a   Kouyos, Roger D ^a   Bonhoeffer, Sebastian ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Evolution of sex; High complementarity behavior; Host parasite; Multiple infections; Red Queen

Indexed keywords

COEVOLUTION; HOST-PARASITE INTERACTION; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; RED QUEEN HYPOTHESIS; SEXUAL REPRODUCTION; SEXUAL SELECTION;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; EVOLUTION; GENETIC SELECTION; HOST PARASITE INTERACTION; REPRODUCTION; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT;

EVOLUTION; HOST-PARASITE INTERACTIONS; MODELS, GENETIC; REPRODUCTION; SELECTION, GENETIC; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION;

EID: 77953881801     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.00951.x     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Agrawal A, Lively C M. Infection genetics: gene-for-gene versus matching-alleles models and all points in between. Evol. Ecol. Res. 2002, 4:79-90.
2. Baird K J. Multiple infection of clover plants by strains of the nodule organism in the field. Nature 1951, 168:116-117.
3. Barton N H. A general model for the evolution of recombination. Genet. Res. 1995, 65:123-145.
4. Bell G. The masterpiece of nature: the evolution and genetics of sexuality 1982, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA
5. Bodmer W, Felsenstein J. Linkage and selection: theoretical analysis of the deterministic two locus random mating model. Genetics 1967, 57:237-265.
6. Brogden K A, Guthmiller J M. Polymicrobial Diseases 2002, ASM Press
7. Carius H J, Little T J, Ebert D. Genetic variation in a host-parasite association: potential for coevolution and frequency-dependent selection. Evolution 2001, 55:1136-1145.
8. Cox F E. Concomitant infections, parasites and immune responses. Parasitology 2001, 122:23-38.
9. Dybdahl M F, Lively C M. Host-parasite coevolution: evidence for rare advantage and time-lagged selection in a natural population: Evolution. 1998, 52:1057-1066.
10. Feldman M, Franklin I, Thomson G. Selection in complex genetic systems I. The symmetric equilibria of the three-locus symmetric viability model. Genetics 1974, 76:135-162.
11. Fischer O, Schmid-Hempel P. Selection by parasites may increase host recombination frequency. Biol. Let. 2005, 1:193-195.
12. Franklin I, Lewontin R C. Is the gene the unit of selection. Genetics 1970, 65:707.
13. Gandon S, Otto S P. The evolution of sex and recombination in response to abiotic or coevolutionary fluctuations in epistasis. Genetics 2007, 175:1835.
14. Graham A L, Cattadori I M, Lloyd-Smith J O, Ferrari M J, Bjørnstad O N. Transmission consequences of coinfection: cytokines writ large. 2007, 23:284-291. TRENDS Parasitol
15. Hamilton W D. Sex versus non-sex versus parasite short-lived parasites, rapid evolving, model, demography. Oikos 1980, 35:282-290.
16. Hamilton W D, Axelrod R, Tanese R. Sexual reproduction as an adaptation to resist parasites (a review). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 1990, 87:3566-3573. USA
17. Hood M E. Dynamics of multiple infection and within-host competition by the anther-smut pathogen. Am. Nat. 2003, 162:122-133.
18. Jaenike J. An hypothesis to account for the maintenance of sex within populations. Evol. Theory 1978, 3:191-194.
19. Kouyos R D, Otto S P, Bonhoeffer S. Effect of varying epistasis on the evolution of recombination. Genetics 2006, 173:589.
20. Kouyos R D, Salathé M, Bonhoeffer S. The Red Queen and the persistence of linkage-disequilibrium oscillations in finite and infinite populations. BMC Evol. Biol. 2007, 7:211.
21. Kouyos R D, Salathé M, Otto S P, Bonhoeffer S. The role of epistasis on the evolution of recombination in host-parasite coevolution. Theor. Pop. Biol. 2009, 75:1-13.
22. Lively C M. Evidence from a New Zealand snail for the maintenance of sex by parasitism. Nature 1987, 328:519-521.
23. Lloyd D G. Benefits and handicaps of sexual reproduction. Evol. Biol. 1980, 13:69-111.
24. Maynard Smith J. The origin and maintenance of sex. 1971, 163-175. Group Selection Pp
25. Nee S. Antagonistic co-evolution and the evolution of genotypic randomization. J. Theor. Biol. 1989, 140:499-518.
26. Otto S P, Lenormand T. Resolving the paradox of sex and recombination. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2002, 3:252-261.
27. Otto S P, Nuismer S L. Species interactions and the evolution of sex. Science 2004, 304:1018-1020.
28. Peters A D, Lively C M. The Red Queen and fluctuating epistasis: a population genetic analysis of antagonistic coevolution. Am. Nat. 1999, 154:393-405.
29. Peters A D, Lively C M. Short-and long-term benefits and detriments to recombination under antagonistic coevolution. J. Evol. Biol. 2007, 20:1206-1217.
30. Petney T N, Andrews R H. Multiparasite communities in animals and humans: frequency, structure and pathogenic significance. Int. J. Parasitol. 1998, 28:377-393.
31. Read A F, Taylor L H. The ecology of genetically diverse infections. Science 2001, 292:1099-1102.
32. Salathé M, Kouyos R D, Bonhoeffer S. The state of affairs in the kingdom of the Red Queen. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2008a, 23:439-445.
33. Salathé M, Kouyos R D, Regoes R R, Bonhoeffer S. Rapid parasite adaptation drives selection for high recombination rates. Evolution 2008b, 62:295-300.
34. Salathé M, Kouyos R D, Bonhoeffer S. On the causes of selection for recombination underlying the Red Queen Hypothesis. Am. Nat. 2009, 174:31-42.
35. Sorensen R E, Minchella D J. Parasite influences on host life history: Echinostoma revolutum parasitism of Lymnaea elodes snails. Oecologia 1998, 115:188-195.
36. Stirnadel H A, Ebert D. Prevalence, host specificity and impact on host fecundity of microparasites and epibionts in three sympatric Daphnia species. J. Anim. Ecol. 1997, 66:212-222.
37. Woolhouse M E J, Webster J P, Domingo E, Charlesworth B, Levin B R. Biological and biomedical implications of the co-evolution of pathogens and their hosts. Nat. Genet. 2002, 32:569-577.