Preserving the context of interrupted business process activities

ICEIS 2005 - Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 38-45

  Bassil, Sarita ^a   Rinderle, Stefanie ^b   Keller, Rudolf ^c   Kropf, Peter ^d   Reichert, Manfred ^e  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

^c ZÜHLKE ENGINEERING AG   (Switzerland)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NEUCHÂTEL   (Switzerland)

^e UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

B2B and B2C applications; Business processes; Data analysis; Flexibility; Information systems

Indexed keywords

ADVANCED PROCESS; APPLICATION ENVIRONMENT; B2B AND B2C APPLICATIONS; BUSINESS PROCESS; CORRECTNESS CRITERION; CURRENT DATA; DATA ANALYSIS; DATA CLASSIFICATION; DATA UPDATE; FLEXIBILITY; POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS; PROCESS ACTIVITIES; REAL-WORLD APPLICATION;

DATA REDUCTION; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; SWITCHING CIRCUITS;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

EID: 77953878135     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Bassil, S., Bourbeau, B., Keller, R., and Kropf, P. (2003). A dynamic approach to multi-transfer container management. In Proc. Int'l Works. ODYSSEUS'03, Sicily.
2. Bassil, S., Keller, R., and Kropf, P. (2004). A workflow- oriented system architecture for the management of container transportation. In Proc. Int'l Conf. BPM'04, pages 116-131, Potsdam.
3. Casati, F., Ceri, S., Pernici, B., and Pozzi, G. (1998). Workflow evolution. DKE, 24(3):211-238.
4. Eder, J. and Pichler, H. (2002). Duration histograms for workflow systems. In Proc. Conf. EISIC'02, pages 25-27, Kanazawa, Japan.
5. Eder, J., Pichler, H., Gruber, W., and Ninaus, M. (2003). Personal schedules for workflow systems. In Proc. Int'l Conf. BPM'03, pages 216-231, Eindhoven.
6. Gartner Group (1999). Why e-business craves workflow technology. Technical Report T-09-4929.
7. Mangan, P. and Sadiq, S. (2002). A constraint specification approach to building flexible workflows. Journal of Research and Practice in Inf Tech, 35(1):21-39.
8. Reichert, M., Dadam, P., and Bauer, T. (2003). Dealing with forward and backward jumps in workflow management systems. Int'l Journal SOSYM, 2(1):37-58.
9. Rinderle, S., Reichert, M., and Dadam, P. (2004a). Correctness criteria for dynamic changes in workflow systems - a survey. DKE, 50(1):9-34.
10. Rinderle, S., Reichert, M., and Dadam, P. (2004b). On dealing with structural conflicts between process type and instance changes. In Proc. Int'l Conf. BPM'04, pages 274-289, Potsdam.
11. Sadiq, S., Sadiq, W., and Orlowska, M. (2001). Pockets of flexibility in workflow specifications. In Proc. ER'01 Conf., pages 513-526, Yokohama.
12. v.d. Aalst, W. and van Hee, K. (2002). Workflow Management. MIT Press.
13. Workflow Management Coalition (1999). Terminology & glossary. Technical Report WFMC-TC-1011, WfMC.