Inbreeding, energy use and sexual signaling

Evolutionary Ecology

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 761-772

  Ketola, Tarmo ^a   Kotiaho, Janne S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

Author keywords

Condition; Cricket; Energy use; Quality; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

BODY CONDITION; BODY MASS; CRICKET; ENERGY BUDGET; INBREEDING; METABOLISM; PHYSICAL PROPERTY; REPRODUCTIVE COST; SEXUAL SELECTION; SIGNALING;

GRYLLIDAE; GRYLLODES SIGILLATUS;

EID: 77953872759     PISSN: 02697653     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10682-009-9333-1     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Andersson M (1982) Sexual selection, natural selection and quality advertisement. Biol J Linn Soc 17: 375-393.
2. Andersson M (1986) Evolution of condition-dependent sex ornaments and mating preferences: sexual selection based on viability differences. Evolution 40: 804-816.
3. Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
4. Aspi J (2000) Inbreeding and outbreeding depression in male courtship song characters in Drosophila montana. Heredity 84: 273-282.
5. Bennet AF, Ruben JA (1979) Endothermy and activity in vertebrates. Science 206: 649-654.
6. Candolin U (1999) The relationship between signal quality and physical condition: is sexual signaling honest in three-spined stickleback? Anim Behav 58: 1261-1267.
7. Chappell MA, Zuk M, Johnsen TS, Kwan TH (1997) Mate choice and aerobic capacity in red junglefowl. Behaviour 134: 511-529.
8. Cotton S, Fowler K, Pomiankowski A (2004) Do sexual ornaments demonstrate heightened condition-dependent expression as predicted by the handicap hypothesis? Proc R Soc Lond B 271: 771-784.
9. de Jong G, van Noordwijk AJ (1992) Acquisition and allocation of resources: genetic (co)variances, selection, and life histories. Am Nat 139: 749-770.
10. Drayton JM, Hunt J, Brooks R, Jennions MD (2007) Sounds different: inbreeding depression in sexually selected traits in the cricket Teleogryllus commodus. J Evol Biol 20: 1138-1147.
11. Drent R, Daan S (1980) The prudent parent: energetic adjustment in avian breeding. Ardea 68: 225-252.
12. Gadgil M, Bossert W (1970) Life history consequences of natural selection. Am Nat 104: 1-24.
13. Hack MA (1998) The energetics of male mating strategies in field crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllinae: Gryllidae). J Insect Behav 11: 853-867.
14. Hayes JP, Speakman JR, Racey PA (1992) Sampling bias in respirometry. Physiological Zoology 65: 604-619.
15. Hill RW, Wyse GA (1989) Animal physiology, 2nd edn. Harper and Row, New York.
16. Hunt J, Bussiére LF, Jennions MD, Brooks R (2004a) What is genetic quality? Trends Ecol Evol 19: 329-333.
17. Hunt J, Brooks R, Jennions MD, Smith MJ, Bentsen CL, Bussiere LF (2004b) High-quality male field crickets invest heavily in sexual display but die young. Nature 432: 1024-1027.
18. Johnston SL, Souter DM, Erwin SS, Tolkamp BJ, Yearsley JM, Gordon IJ, Illius AW, Kyriazakis I, Speakman JR (2007) Associations between basal metabolic rate and reproductive performance in C57BL/6 J mice. J Exp Biol 210: 65-74.
19. Ketola T, Kotiaho JS (2009) Inbreeding, energy use and condition. J Evol Biol 22: 770-781.
20. Ketola T, Kortet R, Kotiaho JS (2007) Testing sexual selection theories in decorated crickets (Gryllodes sigillatus). Evol Ecol Res 9: 869-885.
21. Kirkpatrick M, Ryan MJ (1991) The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature 350: 33-38.
22. Kokko H, Rankin DJ (2006) Lonely hearts or sex in the city? Density dependent effects in mating systems. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 361: 319-334.
23. Konarzewski M, Diamond J (1995) Evolution of basal metabolic rate and organ masses in laboratory mice. Evolution 49: 1239-1248.
24. Kotiaho JS (2001) Cost of sexual traits: a mismatch between theoretical considerations and empirical evidence. Biol Rev 76: 365-376.
25. Kotiaho JS, Puurtinen M (2007) Mate choice for indirect benefits: scrutiny of the current paradigm. Funct Ecol 21: 638-644.
26. Kotiaho JS, Alatalo RV, Mappes J, Nielsen MG, Parri S, Rivero A (1998) Energetic costs of size and sexual signaling in a wolf spider. Proc R Soc Lond B 265: 2203-2209.
27. Kristensen TN, Sørensen P, Kruhøffer M, Pedersen KS, Loeschcke V (2005) Genome-wide analysis of inbreeding effects on gene expression in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 171: 157-167.
28. Kristensen TN, Sørensen P, Pedersen KS, Kruhøffer M, Loeschcke V (2006) Inbreeding by environmental interactions affect gene expression in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 173: 1329-1336.
29. Loher W, Dambach M (1989) Reproductive behaviour. In: Huber FT, Moore E, Loher W (eds) Cricket behavior and neurobiology. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, pp 43-82.
30. Lynch M, Walsh B (1998) Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.
31. Miller PS, Glasner J, Hedrick PW (1993) Inbreeding depression and male-mating behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetica 88: 29-36.
32. Neff BD, Pitcher TE (2005) Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes. Mol Ecol 14: 19-38.
33. Nilsson J-Å (2002) Metabolic consequences of hard work. Proc R Soc Lond B 269: 1735-1739.
34. Packard GC, Boardman TJ (1999) The use of percentages and size specific indices to normalize physiological data for variation in body size: wasted time, wasted effort? Comp Biochem Physiol A 122: 37-44.
35. Parsson PA (2005) Environments and evolution: interactions between stress, resource inadequacy and energetic efficiency. Biol Rev 80: 589-610.
36. Prestwich KN, Brugger KE, Topping M (1989) Energy and communication in three species of hylid frogs: power input, power output and efficiency. J Exp Biol 144: 53-80.
37. Puurtinen M, Ketola T, Kotiaho JS (2005) Genetic compatibility and sexual selection. Trends Ecol Evol 20: 157-158.
38. Puurtinen M, Ketola T, Kotiaho JS (2009) The good genes and compatible genes benefits of mate choice. Am Nat 174: 741-752.
39. Radwan J, Chadzinska M, Cichon M, Mills SC, Matula B, Sadowska ET, Baliga K, Stanisz A, Lopuch S, Koteja P (2006) Metabolic costs of sexual advertisement in the bank vole (Clethrionomys glareolus). Evol Ecol Res 8: 859-869.
40. Reinhold K, Greenfield MD, Jang Y, Broce A (1998) Energetic cost of sexual attractiveness: ultrasonic advertisement in wax moths. Anim Behav 55: 905-913.
41. Roff D (2002) Life history evolution. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.
42. Rowe L, Houle D (1996) The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits. Proc R Soc Lond B 263: 1415-1421.
43. Sheridan L, Pomiankowski A (1997) Fluctuating asymmetry, spot asymmetry and inbreeding depression in the sexual coloration of male guppy fish. Heredity 79: 515-523.
44. Slate J, David P, Dodds KG, Veenvliet BA, Broad TE, McEvan JC (2004) Understanding the relationship between the inbreeding coefficient and multilocus heterozygosity: theoretical expectations and empirical data. Heredity 93: 255-265.
45. Tomkins JL, Radwan J, Kotiaho JS, Tregenza T (2004) Genic capture and resolving the lek paradox. Trends Ecol Evol 19: 323-328.
46. van Noordwijk AJ, de Jong G (1986) Acquisition and allocation of resources: their influence on variation in life history tactics. Am Nat 128: 137-142.
47. van Oosterhout C, Trigg RE, Carvalho GR, Magurran AE, Hauser L, Shaw PW (2003) Inbreeding depression and genetic load of sexually selected traits: how the guppy lost its spots. J Evol Biol 16: 273-281.
48. Ward S, Speakman JR, Slater PJB (2003) The energy cost of song in the canary, Serinus canaria. Anim Behav 66: 893-902.