Online communication between doctors and patients in Europe: Status and perspectives

Journal of Medical Internet Research

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2010, Pages

  Santana, Silvina ^a   Lausen, Berthold ^b   Bujnowska Fedak, Maria ^c   Chronaki, Catherine ^d   Kummervold, Per Egil ^e   Rasmussen, Janne ^f   Sorensen, Tove ^g  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AVEIRO   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

^c WROCLAW MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

^d Institute of Computer Science   (Greece)

^e UNIVERSITY OF TROMSØ   (Norway)

^f ODENSE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^g UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF NORTH NORWAY   (Norway)

Author keywords

eHealth services utilization and trends; Email communication; Europe; Internet; Logistic regression analysis; Online physician patient interaction; Online prescription ordering; Scheduling appointments online; Survey

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; E-MAIL; ELECTRONIC PRESCRIBING; EPIDEMIOLOGY; EUROPE; FORECASTING; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH SURVEY; HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT; HUMAN; INTERNET; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL RECORD; QUESTIONNAIRE; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS; TELEMEDICINE; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

APPOINTMENTS AND SCHEDULES; COMMUNICATION; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; ELECTRONIC MAIL; ELECTRONIC PRESCRIBING; EUROPE; FORECASTING; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HUMANS; INTERNET; LOGISTIC MODELS; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; POPULATION SURVEILLANCE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SAMPLING STUDIES; TELEMEDICINE;

EID: 77953851997     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14388871     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1281     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. CPME/SCED. On information to patients and patient empowerment. Comité Permanent des Médicins Européens/Standing Committee of European Doctors 2004 Sep 11.
2. Hughes B, Joshi I, Wareham J. Health 2.0 and Medicine 2.0: tensions and controversies in the field. J Med Internet Res 2008;10(3):e23 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 18682374] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.1056]
3. Eysenbach G. Medicine 2.0 Congress website launched (and Definition of Medicine 2.0 / Health 2.0). Gunther Eysenbach's Random Research Rants. 2008. URL: http://gunther-eysenbach.blogspot.com/2008/03/medicine-20-congress-website- launched.html [WebCite Cache ID 5jIpJtefx]
4. Car J, Sheikh A. Email consultations in health care: 1--scope and effectiveness. BMJ 2004 Aug 21;329(7463):435-438 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 15321902] [doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7463.435] (Pubitemid 39141479)
5. Baker L, Rideout J, Gertler P, Raube K. Effect of an Internet-based system for doctor-patient communication on health care spending. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005;12(5):530-536 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 15905484] [doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1778]
6. McGeady D, Kujala J, Ilvonen K. The impact of patient-physician web messaging on healthcare service provision. Int J Med Inform 2008 Jan;77(1):17-23. [Medline: 17188564] [doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.11.004]
7. Bauchner H, Adams W, Burstin H. "You've got mail": issues in communicating with patients and their families by e-mail. Pediatrics 2002 May;109(5):954-956 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 11986460] [doi: 10.1542/peds.109.5.954]
8. Kassirer JP. Patients, physicians, and the Internet. Health Aff (Millwood) 2000;19(6):115-123 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 11192394] [doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.19.6.115]
9. Borowitz SM, Wyatt JC. The origin, content, and workload of e-mail consultations. JAMA 1998 Oct 21;280(15):1321-1324 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 9794310] [doi: 10.1001/jama.280.15.1321]
10. Katz SJ, Moyer CA. The emerging role of online communication between patients and their providers. J Gen Intern Med 2004 Sep;19(9):978-983 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 15333064] [doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30432.x]
11. Spielberg AR. On call and online: sociohistorical, legal, and ethical implications of e-mail for the patient-physician relationship. JAMA 1998 Oct 21;280(15):1353-1359. [Medline: 9794317] [doi: 10.1001/jama.280.15.1353]
12. Smith JJ, Berlin L. E-mail consultation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002 Nov;179(5):1133-1136 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 12388486]
13. Liederman EM, Lee JC, Baquero VH, Seites PG. Patient-physician web messaging. The impact on message volume and satisfaction. J Gen Intern Med 2005 Jan;20(1):52-57 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 15693928] [doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497. 2005.40009.x]
14. Delbanco T, Sands DZ. Electrons in flight--e-mail between doctors and patients. N Engl J Med 2004 Apr 22;350(17):1705-1707. [Medline: 15102994] [doi: 10.1056/NEJMp038209]
15. Patt MR, Houston TK, Jenckes MW, Sands DZ, Ford DE. Doctors who are using e-mail with their patients: a qualitative exploration. J Med Internet Res 2003 May 15;5(2):e9 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 12857665] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.5.2.e9]
16. Sittig DF. Results of a content analysis of electronic messages (email) sent between patients and their physicians. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2003 Oct 1;3(1):11 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 14519206] [doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-3-11]
17. Gaster B, Knight CL, DeWitt DE, Sheffield JVL, Assefi NP, Buchwald D. Physicians' use of and attitudes toward electronic mail for patient communication. J Gen Intern Med 2003 May;18(5):385-389 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 12795738] [doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20627.x]
18. Katz SJ, Nissan N, Moyer CA. Crossing the digital divide: evaluating online communication between patients and their providers. Am J Manag Care 2004 Sep;10(9):593-598 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 15515991]
19. Nordqvist C, Hanberger L, Timpka T, Nordfeldt S. Health professionals' attitudes towards using a Web 2.0 portal for child and adolescent diabetes care: qualitative study. J Med Internet Res 2009;11(1):e12. [Medline: 15515991] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.1152]
20. Virji A, Yarnall KSH, Krause KM, Pollak KI, Scannell MA, Gradison M, et al. Use of email in a family practice setting: opportunities and challenges in patient- and physician-initiated communication. BMC Med 2006;4(1):18 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 16911780] [doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-4-18]
21. Lin C, Wittevrongel L, Moore L, Beaty BL, Ross SE. An Internet-based patient-provider communication system: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2005;7(4):e47 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 16236699] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.4.e47]
22. Adler KG. Web portals in primary care: an evaluation of patient readiness and willingness to pay for online services. J Med Internet Res 2006;8(4):e26 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 17213045] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.8.4.e26]
23. Kleiner KD, Akers R, Burke BL, Werner EJ. Parent and physician attitudes regarding electronic communication in pediatric practices. Pediatrics 2002 May;109(5):740-744 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 11986430] [doi: 10.1542/peds.109.5.740]
24. Anand SG, Feldman MJ, Geller DS, Bisbee A, Bauchner H. A content analysis of e-mail communication between primary care providers and parents. Pediatrics 2005 May;115(5):1283-1288 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 15867036] [doi:10.1542/peds.2004-1297]
25. Singh H, Fox SA, Petersen NJ, Shethia A, Street RL. Older patients' enthusiasm to use electronic mail to communicate with their physicians: cross-sectional survey. J Med Internet Res 2009;11(2):e18 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 19632972] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.1143]
26. Goodyear-Smith F, Wearn A, Everts H, Huggard P, Halliwell J. Pandora's electronic box: GPs reflect upon email communication with their patients. Inform Prim Care 2005;13(3):195-202. [Medline: 16259859]
27. Neville RG, Marsden W, McCowan C, Pagliari C, Mullen H, Fannin A. A survey of GP attitudes to and experiences of email consultations. Inform Prim Care 2004;12(4):201-206. [Medline: 15808021]
28. Castrén J, Niemi M, Virjo I. Use of email for patient communication in student health care: a cross-sectional study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2005 Jan 27;5(1):2 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 15676077] [doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-5-2]
29. Cummings J. Few patients use or have access to online services for communicating with their doctors, but most would like to. The Wall Street Journal Online 2006;5(16).
30. Beckjord EB, Finney Rutten LJ, Squiers L, Arora NK, Volckmann L, Moser RP, et al. Use of the internet to communicate with health care providers in the United States: estimates from the 2003 and 2005 Health Information National Trends Surveys (HINTS). J Med Internet Res 2007;9(3):e20 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 17627929] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.9.3.e20]
31. Kummervold PE, Chronaki CE, Lausen B, Prokosch H, Rasmussen J, Santana S, et al. eHealth trends in Europe 2005-2007: a population-based survey. J Med Internet Res 2008;10(4):e42 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 19017584] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.1023]
32. Nijland N, van Gemert-Pijnen JEWC, Boer H, Steehouder MF, Seydel ER. Increasing the use of e-consultation in primary care: results of an online survey among non-users of e-consultation. Int J Med Inform 2009 Oct;78(10):688-703. [Medline: 19625210] [doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.06.002]
33. eHealth ERA. 2007. Database of European eHealth priorities and strategies. URL: http://www.ehealth-era.org/database/database.html [WebCite Cache ID 5imAWVd44]
34. The Ministry of the Interior and Health. Sundhedsstyrelsen. 2003 May. National IT Strategy for the Danish Health Care Service 2003-2007. URL: http://www.sst.dk/publ/Publ2004/National-IT-strategy.pdf [WebCite Cache ID 5ipKeMlxK]
35. Stroetmann KA, Lilischkis S. eHealth ERA. 2007. eHealth strategy and implementation activities in Germany: Report in the framework of the eHealth ERA project URL: http://www.ehealth-era.org/database/documents/ERA-Reports/Germany- eH-ERA-Country-Report-final-30-06-2007.pdf [WebCite Cache ID 5ipKmmytx]
36. Doupi P. eHealth ERA. 2007. eHealth strategy and implementation activities in GREECE URL: http://www.ehealth-era.org/database/documents/ERA- Reports/Greece-eHealth-ERA-Country-Report-Final-21-05-2007.pdf [WebCite Cache ID 5ipKu49t7]
37. Duplaga M, Leszczuk M, Wirska A, Bukowczan S, Andrychiewicz A. eHealth ERA. 2007. eHealth strategy and implementation activities in Latvia. URL: http://www.ehealth-era.org/database/documents/ERA-Reports/eH-ERA-Latvia-report- April%202007.pdf [WebCite Cache ID 5ipL02Vrd]
38. eHealth ERA. 2007. eHealth priorities and strategies in European countries:act sheet: Norway URL: http://www.ehealth-era.org/database/documents/ factsheets/Norway.pdf [WebCite Cache ID 5ipL6VY4c]
39. Duplaga M, Leszczuk M, Wirska A, Kozierkiewicz A, Trabka W. eHealth ERA. 2007. eHealth strategy and implementation activities in Poland: Report in the framework of the eHealth ERA project URL: http://www.ehealth-era.org/database/ documents/ERA-Reports/eH-ERA-Poland-report-January%20%202007.pdf [WebCite Cache ID 5ipLDNJ5X]
40. Monteagudo JL, Moreno O. eHealth ERA. 2007. eHealth strategy and implementation activities in Portugal: Report in the framework of the eHealth ERA project URL: http://www.ehealth-era.org/database/documents/ERA-Reports/ Portugal-eHealth-ERA-country-report-final-01-06-2007.pdf [WebCite Cache ID 5ipLLCTgN]
41. Erkut S, Alarcón O, Coll C, Tropp L, Garcia H. The dual-focus approach to creating bilingual measures. J Cross Cult Psychol 1999;30(2):206-218. [doi: 10.1177/0022022199030002004]
42. R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2008.
43. Meyer I. Benchmarking ICT use among General Practitioners in Europe, European Commission. Bonn, Germany: Information Society and Media Directorate General and Empirica; 2008.
44. Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.
45. Poon EG, Jha AK, Christino M, Honour MM, Fernandopulle R, Middleton B, et al. Assessing the level of healthcare information technology adoption in the United States: a snapshot. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2006;6(1):1 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 16396679] [doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-6-1]
46. Jha AK, DesRoches CM, Campbell EG, Donelan K, Rao SR, Ferris TG, et al. Use of electronic health records in U.S. hospitals. N Engl J Med 2009 Apr 16;360(16):1628-1638 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 19321858] [doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0900592]
47. European Commission, Information Society and Media. eHealth ERA report. 2007 Mar. eHealth Priorities and Strategies in European Countries. Towards the Establishment of a European eHealth Research Area. URL: http://ec.europa.eu/ information-society/activities/health/docs/policy/ehealth-era-full-report.pdf [WebCite Cache ID 5pZIOR23V]
48. Bundesministerium für Gesundheit, Tests bestanden - Einführung der Karte kann beginnen. 2009 URL: http://www.bmg.bund.de/cln-110/nn-1211088/ SharedDocs/Standardartikel/DE/AZ/E/Glossar-Elektronische-Gesundheitskarte/ Karte-im-Test.html?--nnn=true [WebCite Cache ID 5hKue6Bbu]
49. eUser Public Online Services and User Orientation. 2005 Aug. Country Brief: Germany. URL: http://www.euser-eu.org/ShowCase.asp?CaseID= 1659&LevelCodeID=81&print=YES [WebCite Cache ID 5pZIvQybg]
50. Health Which? and NHS National Programme for Information Technology. National Health Service. 2003. The Public View on Electronic Health Records. URL: http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod-consum-dh/groups/dh-digitalassets/@dh/@en/ documents/digitalasset/dh-4055046.pdf [WebCite Cache ID 5pZJLEMV3]
51. Chronaki C, Roumeliotaki T, Bujnowska-Fedak M, Staniszewski A. E-Health consumer attitudes in Poland and Greece: a comparison. In: Cunningham P, Cunnigham M, editors. Collaboration and the Knowledge Economy: Issues, Applications, Case Studies. Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press;36-42 .
52. sundhed.dk. 2009. The Danish eHealth Portal. URL: https://www.sundhed.dk/ [WebCite Cache ID 5jI1roySp]
53. sundhed.dk. 2007. Kontakten til lægen bliver stadig mere elektronisk. URL: https://www.sundhed.dk/Artikel.aspx?id=10635.
54. eUser Public Online Services and User Orientation. 2005 Aug. Country Brief: Denmark URL: http://www.euser-eu.org/eUSER_eHealthCountryBrief.asp? CaseID=2217&CaseTitleID=1058&MenuID=118 [WebCite Cache ID 5pbG1S1lx]
55. Andreassen HK, Bujnowska-Fedak MM, Chronaki CE, Dumitru RC, Pudule I, Santana S, et al. European citizens' use of E-health services: a study of seven countries. BMC Public Health 2007;7(1):53 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 17425798] [doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-53]
56. Rutten LJF, Squiers L, Hesse B. Cancer-related information seeking: hints from the 2003 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS). J Health Commun 2006;11 Suppl 1(1):147-156. [Medline: 16641080] [doi: 10.1080/10810730600637574] (Pubitemid 44594390)