Determining which automatic digital blood pressure device performs adequately: A systematic review

Journal of Human Hypertension

Volumn 24, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 431-438

  Wan, Y ^a   Heneghan, C ^b   Stevens, R ^b   McManus, R J ^c   Ward, A ^b   Perera, R ^b   Thompson, M ^b   Tarassenko, L ^b   Mant, D ^b  

^a FOURTH MILITARY MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

blood pressure; sphygmomanometer; validation

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATIC DIGITAL BLOOD PRESSURE; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; HUMAN; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; REVIEW; SPHYGMOMANOMETER; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; VALIDATION STUDY; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITOR; HYPERTENSION; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARDS;

BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORS; HUMANS; HYPERTENSION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; VALIDATION STUDIES AS TOPIC;

EID: 77953810323     PISSN: 09509240     EISSN: 14765527     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/jhh.2010.37     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. O'Brien E, Asmar R, Beilin L, Imai Y, Mallion JM, Mancia G et al. European Society of Hypertension recommendations for conventional, ambulatory and home blood pressure measurement. J Hypertens 2003; 21(5): 821-848.
2. Wolf-Maier K, Cooper RS, Banegas JR, Giampaoli S, Hense HW, Joffres M et al. Hypertension prevalence and blood pressure levels in 6 European countries, Canada, and the United States. JAMA 2003; 289(18): 2363-2369.
3. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo Jr JL et al. The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA 2003; 289(19): 2560-2572.
4. ALLHAT Officers and Coordinators for the ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group. The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial. Major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic: the antihypertensive and lipid-lowering treatment to prevent heart attack trial (ALLHAT). JAMA 2002; 288(23): 2981-2997.
5. Julius S, Jamerson K, Gudbrandsson T, Schork N. White coat hypertension: a follow-up. Clin Exp Hypertens A 1992; 14(1-2): 45-53.
6. Pater C. Beyond the Evidence of the New Hypertension Guidelines. Blood pressure measurement-is it good enough for accurate diagnosis of hypertension? Time might be in, for a paradigm shift (I). Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med 2005; 6(1): 6.
7. Padwal R, Straus SE, McAlister FA. Evidence based management of hypertension. Cardiovascular risk factors and their effects on the decision to treat hypertension: evidence based review. BMJ 2001; 322(7292): 977-980.
8. NICE. Clinical guideline 34: hypertension: management of hypertension in adults in primary care: partial update. 2008. Available from: URL: http://www. nice.org.uk/CG034guidance.
9. O'Brien E, Petrie J, Littler W, de SM, Padfield PL, Altman DG et al. An outline of the revised British Hypertension Society protocol for the evaluation of blood pressure measuring devices. J Hypertens 1993; 11(6): 677-679.
10. O'Brien E, Pickering T, Asmar R, Myers M, Parati G, Staessen J et al. Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring of the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol for validation of blood pressure measuring devices in adults. Blood Press Monit 2002; 7(1): 3-17.
11. Schwartz AR, Haas DC, Gerin W, Pickering TG. Accurate measurement of blood pressure. JAMA 2003; 289(21): 2792-2794.
12. Fournier A, Safar M. Accurate measurement of blood pressure. JAMA 2003; 289(21): 2793-2794.
13. Jones DW, Appel LJ, Sheps SG, Roccella EJ, Lenfant C. Measuring blood pressure accurately: new and persistent challenges. JAMA 2003; 289(8): 1027-1030.
14. Reinders A, Jones CR, Cuckson AC, Shennan AH. The Maxi Stabil 3: validation of an aneroid device according to a modified British Hypertension Society protocol. Blood Press Monit 2003; 8(2): 83-89.
15. Iglesias BP, Mayoral SE, Lapetra PJ, Iborra OM, Villalba AF, Cayuela DA. Validation of two systems of selfmeasurement of blood pressure, the OMRON HEM-705 CP and OMRON M1 (HEM 422C2-E) models. Aten Primaria 2002; 30(1): 22-28.
16. Lewis JE, Boyle E, Magharious L, Myers MG. Evaluation of a community-based automated blood pressure measuring device. CMAJ 2002; 166(9): 1145-1148.
17. Shuler CL, Allison N, Holcomb S, Harlan M, McNeill J, Robinett G et al. Accuracy of an automated blood pressure device in stable inpatients: optimum vs routine use. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158(7): 714-721.
18. White WB, Anwar YA. Evaluation of the overall efficacy of the Omron office digital blood pressure HEM-907 monitor in adults. Blood Press Monit 2001; 6(2): 107-110.
19. El Assaad MA, Topouchian JA, Darne BM, Asmar RG. Validation of the Omron HEM-907 device for blood pressure measurement. Blood Press Monit 2002; 7(4): 237-241.
20. De GA, Reggiori F, Shennan AH. Clinical assessment of the DINAMAP ProCare monitor in an adult population according to the British Hypertension Society Protocol. Blood Press Monit 2007; 12(1): 51-55.
21. van Popele NM, Bos WJ, de Beer NA, van Der Kuip DA, Hofman A, Grobbee DE et al. Arterial stiffness as underlying mechanism of disagreement between an oscillometric blood pressure monitor and a sphygmomanometer. Hypertension 2000; 36(4): 484-488.
22. van Ittersum FJ, Wijering RM, Lambert J, Donker AJ, Stehouwer CD. Determinants of the limits of agreement between the sphygmomanometer and the SpaceLabs 90207 device for blood pressure measurement in health volunteers and insulin-dependent diabetic patients. J Hypertens 1998; 16(8): 1125-1130.
23. McManus RJ, Mant J, Hull MR, Hobbs FD. Does changing from mercury to electronic blood pressure measurement influence recorded blood pressure? An observational study. Br J Gen Pract 2003; 53(497): 953-956.
24. Pickering T. Hypertension: a companion to Braunwald's Heart Disease. Black HR and Elliott W (eds). Home Monitoring of Blood Pressure, Chapter 6. Saunders Elsevier: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2006, p 70.