Application of the nearly perfectly matched layer to the propagation of low-frequency acoustic waves

Journal of Geophysics and Engineering

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 277-283

  Chen, Jingyi ^a   Bording, Ralph Phillip ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TULSA   (United States)

^b ALABAMA A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Acoustic modelling; Low frequency; Nearly perfectly matched layer; Unsplit convolutional perfectly matched layer

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; ACOUSTIC WAVE; BOUNDARY CONDITION; FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; SEISMIC REFLECTION; SEISMIC WAVE; TWO-DIMENSIONAL MODELING; WAVE PROPAGATION;

EID: 77953788830     PISSN: 17422132     EISSN: 17422140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/1742-2132/7/3/006     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bérenger J 1994 A perfectly matched layer for the absorption of electromagnetic waves J. Comput. Phys. 114 185-200
2. Bérenger J 2004 On the reflection from Cummer's nearly perfectly matched layer. A perfectly matched layer for the absorption of electromagnetic waves IEEE Microw. Wirel. Compon. Lett. 14 334-6
3. Bording R P 2004 Finite difference modeling-nearly optimal sponge boundary conditions 74th SEG Meeting, Expanded Abstracts (Denver, CO, USA) 23 1921-4
4. Carcione J M 1996 Wave propagation in anisotropic, saturated porous media: plane wave theory and numerical simulation J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99 2655-66
5. Carcione J M 1998 Viscoelastic effective rheologies for modeling wave propagation in porous media Geophys. Prospect. 46 249-70
6. Cerjan C, Kosloff D, Kosloff R and Reshef M 1985 A nonreflecting boundary condition for discrete acoustic and elastic wave equations Geophysics 50 705-8
7. Chen J, Bording R P, Liu E, Zhang Z and Badal J 2010a The application of the nearly optimal sponge boundary conditions for seismic wave propagation in poroelastic media J. Seism. Explor. 19 1-19
8. Chen J, Zhang C and Bording R P 2010b Comparison between the nearly perfectly matched layer and unsplit convolutional perfectly matched layer methods using acoustic wave modeling J. Seism. Explor. 19 173-85
9. Clayton R and Engquist B 1977 Absorbing boundary conditions for acoustic and elastic wave equations Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 67 1529-40
10. Collino F and Tsogka C 2001 Application of the PML absorbing layer model to the linear elastodynamic problem in anisotropic heterogeneous media Geophysics 66 294-307
11. Cummer S A 2003 A simple, nearly perfectly matched layer for general electromagnetic media IEEE Microw. Wirel. Compon. Lett. 13 137-40
12. Dai N, Vafidis A and Kanasewick E R 1995 Wave propagation in heterogeneous, porous media: a velocity-stress, finite-difference method Geophysics 60 327-40
13. Dong L, She D, Guan L and Ma Z 2005 An eigenvalue decomposition method to construct absorbing boundary conditions for acoustic and elastic wave equations J. Geophys. Eng. 2 192-8
14. Engquist B and Majda A 1977 Absorbing boundary conditions fro the numerical simulation of waves Math. Comput. 31 629-51
15. Faria E L and Stoffa P L 1994 Finite-difference modeling in transversely isotropic media Geophysics 59 282-9
16. Fokkema J T and Van Den Berg P M 1993 Seismic Applications of Acoustic Reciprocity (Amsterdam: Elsevier)
17. Guddati M N and Lim K W 2006 Continued fraction absorbing boundary conditions for convex polygonal domains Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 66 949-77
18. Hassanzadeh S 1991 Acoustic modeling in fluid saturated porous media Geophysics 56 424-35
19. Higdon R L 1991 Absorbing boundary conditions for elastic waves Geophysics 56 231-41
20. Hu W, Abubakar A and Habashy T M 2007 Application of the nearly perfectly matched layer in acoustic wave modeling Geophysics 72 169-75
21. Hu W and Cummer S A 2004 The nearly perfectly matched layer is a perfectly matched layer IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 3 137-40
22. Hu W and Cummer S A 2006 An FDTD model for low and high altitude lightning-generated EM fields IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 54 1513-22
23. Komatitsch D and Martin R 2007 An unsplit convolutional perfectly matched layer improved at grazing incidence for the seismic wave equation Geophysics 72 155-67
24. Kuzuoglu M and Mittra R 1996 Frequency dependence of the constitutive parameters of causal perfectly matched anisotropic absorbers IEEE Microw. Guid. Wave Lett. 6 447-9
25. Madariaga R 1976 Dynamics of an expanding circular fault Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 66 639-66
26. Martin R, Komatitsch D and Ezziani A 2008 An unsplit convolutional perfectly matched layer improved at grazing incidence for seismic wave propagation in poroelastic media Geophysics 73 T51-61
27. Mittet R 2002 Free-surface boundary conditions for elastic staggered-grid modeling schemes Geophysics 67 1616-23
28. Moczo P, Kristek J and Halada L 2000 3D fourth-order staggered-grid finite-difference schemes: stability and grid dispersion Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 90 587-603
29. Mur G 1981 Absorbing boundary conditions for the finite-difference approximation of the time-domain electromagnetic field equations IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat. 23 377-82
30. Quarteroni A, Tagliani A and Zampieri E 1998 Generalized Galerkin approximations of elastic waves with absorbing boundary conditions Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 163 323-41
31. Roden J A and Gedney S D 2000 Convolutional PML (CPML): an efficient FDTD implementation of the CFS-PML for arbitrary media Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 27 334-9
32. Sheen D H, Tuncay K, Baag C E and Ortoleva P J 2006 Parallel implementation of a velocity-stress staggered-grid finite-difference method for 2-D poroelastic wave propagation Comput. Geosci. 32 1182-91
33. Tian X, Kang I, Kim G and Zhang H 2008 An improvement in the absorbing boundary technique for numerical simulation of elastic wave propagation J. Geophys. Eng. 5 203-9
34. Virieux J 1986 P-SV wave propagation in heterogeneous media: velocity-stress finite-difference method Geophysics 51 889-901
35. Yao Z and Margrave G F 2000 Elastic wavefield modelling in 3D by fourth-order staggered-grid finite difference technique CREWES Research Report No 12
36. Zeng Y Q and Liu Q H 2001 A staggered-grid finite-difference method with perfectly matched layers for poroelastic wave equations J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109 2571-80