The application of the nearly optimal sponge boundary conditions for seismic wave propagation in poroelastic media

Journal of Seismic Exploration

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 1-9

  Chen, Jingyi ^a,e   Bording, Ralph Phillip ^a   Liu, Enru ^b   Zhang, Zhongjie ^c   Badal, José ^d  

^a MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDLAND   (Canada)

^b EXXONMOBIL UPSTREAM RESEARCH COMPANY   (United States)

^c INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS   (China)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ZARAGOZA   (Spain)

^e UNIVERSITY OF TULSA   (United States)

Author keywords

Biot squirt mechanism; Boundary conditions; Numerical modeling; Poroelastic media; Staggered grid finite difference

Indexed keywords

BIOT THEORY; BOUNDARY CONDITION; FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; POROELASTICITY; SEISMIC WAVE; TRANSVERSE ISOTROPY; WAVE ENERGY; WAVE PROPAGATION; WAVE REFLECTION;

EID: 76249107455     PISSN: 09630651     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Bérenger, J., 1994. A perfectly matched layer for the absorption of electromagnetic waves. J. Computat. Phys., 114: 185-200.
2. Biot, M.A., 1956a. Theory of propagation of elastic waves in a fluid saturated porous solid. I. Low-frequency rang. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 28: 168-178.
3. Biot, M.A., 1956b. Theory of propagation of elastic waves in a fluid saturated porous solid. II. Higer-frequency range. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 28: 179-191.
4. Biot, M.A., 1962. Mechanics of deformation and acoustic propagation in porous media. J. Appl. Phys., 33: 1482-1498.
5. Bording, R.P., 2004. Finite difference modeling-nearly optimal sponge boundary conditions. Expanded Abstr., 74th Ann. Internat. SEG Mtg., Denver: 1921-1924.
6. Carcione, J.M., 1996. Wave propagation in anisotropic, saturated porous media: plane wave theory and numerical simulation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 99: 2655-2666.
7. Carcione, J.M., 1998. Viscoelastic effective rheologies for modeling wave propagation in porous media. Geophys. Prosp., 46: 249-270.
8. Carcione, J.M., Helle, H.B. and Pham N.H., 2003. White's model for wave propagation in partially saturated rocks: Comparison with poroelastic numerical experiments. Geophysics, 68: 1389-1398.
9. Carcione, J.M. and Picotti, S., 2006. P-wave seismic attenuation by slow-wave diffusion: Effects of inhomogeneous rock properties. Geophysics, 71: 01-08.
10. Carcione, J.M., 2007. Wave Fields in Real Media. Theory and numerical simulation of wave propagation in anisotropic, anelastic, porous and electromagnetic media. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam.
11. Cerjan, C, Kosloff, D., Kosloff, R. and Reshef, M. 1985. A nonreflecting boundary condition for discrete acoustic and elastic wave equations. Geophysics, 50: 705-708.
12. Clayton, R. and Engquist, B., 1977. Absorbing boundary conditions for acoustic and elastic wave equations. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 67: 1529-1540.
13. Collino, F. and Monk, P., 1998. Optimizing the perfectly matched layer. Computer Meth. Appl. Mechanics Engineer., 164: 157-171.
14. Dai, N., Vafidis, A. and Kanasewich, E.R., 1995. Wave propagation in heterogeneous, porous media: A velocity-stress, finite-difference method. Geophysics, 60: 327-340.
15. Dong, L., She, D., Guan, L. and Ma, Z., 2005. An eigenvalue decomposition method to construct absorbing boundary conditions for acoustic and elastic wave equations. J. Geophys. Engineer., 2, 192-198.
16. Dvorkin, J. and Nur, A., 1993. Dynamic poroelasticity: A verified model with the squirt and the Biot mechanisms. Geophysics, 58: 523-533.
17. Dvorkin, J., Nolen-Hoeksema, R. and Nur, A., 1994. The squirt-flow mechanism: Macroscopic description. Geophysics, 59: 428-438.
18. Faria, E.L. and Stoffa, P.L., 1994. Finite-difference modeling in transversely isotropic media. Geophysics. 59: 282-289.
19. Graves, R.W., 1996. Simulating seismic wave propagation in 3d elastic media using staggered-grid finite difference. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 86: 1091-1106.
20. Guddati, M.N. and Lim, K.W., 2006. Continued fraction absorbing boundary conditions for convex polygonal domains. Internat. J. Numer. Meth. Engin., 66: 949-977.
21. Hassanzadeh, S., 1991. Acoustic modeling in fluid saturated porous media. Geophysics 56, 424-435.
22. Higdon, R.L., 1991. Absorbing boundary conditions for elastic waves. Geophysics, 56: 231-241.
23. Komatitsch, D. and Martin, R., 2007. An unsplit convolutional perfectly matched layer improved at grazing incidence for the seismic wave equation. Geophysics, 72: SM155-SM167.
24. Kuzuoglu, M. and Mittra, R., 1996. Frequency dependence of the constitutive parameters of causal perfectly matched anisotropic absorbers. IEEE Microwave Guided Wave Lett., 6: 447-449.
25. Levander, A.R., 1988. Fourth-order finite-fifference P-SV seismograms. Geophysics, 53: 1425-1436.
26. Lou, M. and Rial, J.A., 1995. Modelling elastic-wave propagation in inhomogeneous anisotropic media by the pseudo-spectral method. Geophys. J. Internat., 120: 60-72.
27. Martin, R., Komatitsch, D. and Ezziani, A., 2008. An unsplit convolutional perfectly matched layer improved at grazing incidence for seismic wave propagation in poroelastic media. Geophysics, 73: T51-T61.
28. Mittet, R., 2002. Free-surface boundary conditions for elastic staggered-grid modeling schemes. Geophysics, 67: 1616-1623.
29. Moczo, P., Kristek, J. and Halada, L., 2000. 3D fourth-order staggered-grid finite-difference schemes: Stability and Grid dispersion. Bull. Seismol. Sec. Am., 90: 587-603. (Pubitemid 30667217)
30. Moczo, P., Kristek, J., Vavrycuk, V., Archuleta, R.J. and Halada, L., 2002. The heterogeneous staggered-grid finite-fifference modeling of seismic motion with volume harmonic and arithmetic averaging of elastic moduli and densities. Bull. Seismol. See. Am., 92: 3042-3066.
31. Mou, Y.G. and Pei, Z.L., 2005. Seismic Numerical Modeling for 3D Complex Media. Petroleum Industry Press, Beijing. ISBN 7-5021-4737-3.
32. Parra, J.O., 1997. The transversely isotropic poroelastic wave equation in eluding the Biot and the squirt mechanisms: Theory and application. Geophysics, 62: 309-318.
33. Pride, S.R., Berryman, J.G. and Harris, J.M., 2004. Seismic attenuation due to wave-induced flow. J. Geophys. Res., 109, B01201: 1-19.
34. Roden, J.A. and Gedney, S.D., 2000. Convolution PML (CPML): An efficient FDTD implementation of the CFS-PML for arbitrary media. Microwave Optic. Technol. Lett., 27: 334-339.
35. Sheen, D.H., Tuncay, K., Baag, C.E. and Ortoleva, P.J., 2006. Parallel implementation of a velocity-stress staggered-grid finite-difference method for 2-D poroelastic wave propagation. Computers & Geosci., 32: 1182-1191.
36. Sochacki, J., Kubichek, R., George, R., Fletcher, W.R. and Smithson, S., 1987. Absorbing boundary conditions and surface wave. Geophysics, 52: 60-71.
37. Quarteroni, A., Tagliani, A. and Zampieri, E., 1998. Generalized Galerkin approximations of elastic waves with absorbing boundary conditions. Computer Meth. Appl. Mechan. Engineer., 163: 323-341.
38. Thomsen, L., 1986. Weak elastic anisotropy. Geophysics, 51: 1954-1966.
39. Virieux, J., 1986. P-SV wave propagation in heterogeneous media: velocity-stress finite-difference method. Geophysics, 51: 889-901.
40. White, J.E., 1975. Computed seismic speeds and attenuation in rocks with partial gas saturation. Geophysics, 40: 224-232.
41. Yang, D.H. and Zhang, Z.J., 2000. Effects of the Biot and the squirt flow coupling interaction on anisotropic elastic waves. Chin. Sci. Bull., 45: 333-339.
42. Yang, D.H. and Zhang, Z.J., 2002. Poroelastic wave equation including the Biot/squirt mechanism and the solid/fluid coupling anisotropy. Wave Motion, 35: 223-245.
43. Zahradnik, J., Moczo, P. and Hron, F. 1993. Testing four elastic finite-difference schemes for behavior at discontinuities. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 83: 107-129.
44. Zeng, Y.Q. and Liu, Q.H., 2001. A staggered-grid finite-difference method with perfectly matched layers for poroelastic wave equations. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 109: 2571-2580.