Gathering Behavioral Samples Through a Computerized and Standardized Assessment Center Exercise: Yes, It Is Possible

Journal of Personnel Psychology

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 94-98

  Lievens, Filip ^a   Van Keer, Etienne ^b   Volckaert, Ellen ^b  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b Hudson ^*  (Belgium)

Author keywords

Assessment center; Selection; Technology

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953780177     PISSN: 18665888     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1866-5888/a000010     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Atkins P.W.B., Wood R.E. Self-versus others' ratings as predictors of assessment center ratings: Validation evidence for 360-degree feedback programs. Personnel Psychology 2002, 55:871-904.
2. Bogaert J., Trbovic N., Van Keer E. Ability test suite - Level III - Manual 2005, Ghent, Hudson.
3. Lievens F., Anseel F. Creating alternate in-basket forms through cloning: Some preliminary results. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 2007, 15:405-411.
4. Lievens F., Thornton G.C. Assessment centers: Recent developments in practice and research. The Blackwell handbook of personnel selection 2005, 243-264. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA. A. Evers, O. Smit-Voskuijl, N. Anderson (Eds.).
5. McDaniel M.A., Hartman N.S., Whetzel D.L., Grubb W.L. Situational judgment tests, response instructions and validity: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology 2007, 60:63-91.
6. Meriac J.P., Hoffman B.J., Woehr D.J., Fleisher M.S. Further evidence for the validity of assessment center dimensions: A meta-analysis of the incremental criterion-related validity of dimension ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology 2008, 93:1042-1052.
7. Ryan A.M., Greguras G.J. Life is not multiple choice: Reactions to the alternatives. Alternatives to traditional testing 1998, 183-202. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. M. Hakel (Ed.).
8. Thornton G.C., Rupp D. Assessment centers in human resource management: Strategies for prediction diagnosis, and development 2006, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.