In vitro starch digestion kinetics, corrected for estimated gastric emptying, predict portal glucose appearance in pigs

Journal of Nutrition

Volumn 140, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 1227-1233

  Van Kempen, Theo A T G ^a,b   Regmi, Prajwal R ^c   Matte, J Jacques ^d   Zijlstra, Ruurd T ^c  

^a Provimi Research and Innovation Centre   (Belgium)

^b NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^d AGRICULTURE AND AGRI FOOD CANADA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GLUCOSE; STARCH;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; DIGESTION; FEMALE; GLUCOSE INTAKE; GLUCOSE TRANSPORT; IN VITRO STUDY; KINETICS; NONHUMAN; NUTRIENT CONCENTRATION; PORTAL VEIN; STOMACH EMPTYING; SUGAR INTAKE; SWINE; VEIN CATHETERIZATION;

ANIMALS; DIGESTION; GASTRIC EMPTYING; GLUCOSE; KINETICS; STARCH; SWINE;

SUIDAE;

EID: 77953777480     PISSN: 00223166     EISSN: 15416100     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3945/jn.109.120584     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Englyst KN, Englyst HN, Hudson GJ, Cole TJ, Cummings JH. Rapidly available glucose in foods: an in vitro measurement that reflects the glycemic response. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;69:448-54.
2. Englyst HN, Kingman SM, Cummings JH. Classification and measurement of nutritionally important starch fractions. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1992;46 Suppl 2:S33-50.
3. Englyst KN, Hudson GJ, Englyst HN. Starch analysis in food. In: Meyers RA, editor. Encyclopedia of analytical chemistry. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2000. p. 4246-62.
4. Wolever TM, Jenkins DJ, Jenkins AL, Josse RG. The glycemic index: methodology and clinical implications. Am J Clin Nutr. 1991;54:846-54.
5. Englyst KN, Vinoy S, Englyst HN, Lang V. Glycaemic index of cereal products explained by their content of rapidly and slowly available glucose. Br J Nutr. 2003;89:329-40.
6. Englyst HN, Veenstra J, Hudson GJ. Measurement of rapidly available glucose (RAG) in plant foods: a potential in vitro predictor of the glycaemic response. Br J Nutr. 1996;75:327-37.
7. Muir JG, O'Dea K. Validation of an in vitro assay for predicting the amount of starch that escapes digestion in the small intestine of humans. Am J Clin Nutr. 1993;57:540-6. (Pubitemid 23096726)
8. Garsetti M, Vinoy S, Lang V, Holt S, Loyer S, Brand-Miller JC. The glycemic and insulinemic index of plain sweet biscuits: relationships to in vitro starch digestibility. J Am Coll Nutr. 2005;24:441-7. (Pubitemid 43373168)
9. Weurding RE, Veldman A, Veen WA, van der Aar PJ, Verstegen MW. In vitro starch digestion correlates well with rate and extent of starch digestion in broiler chickens. J Nutr. 2001;131:2336-42.
10. O'Dea K, Snow P, Nestel P. Rate of starch hydrolysis in vitro as a predictor of metabolic responses to complex carbohydrate in vivo. Am J Clin Nutr. 1981;34:1991-3. (Pubitemid 12198633)
11. Priebe MG, Wachters-Hagedoorn RE, Heimweg JA, Small A, Preston T, Elzinga H, Stellaard F, Vonk RJ. An explorative study of in vivo digestive starch characteristics and postprandial glucose kinetics of wholemeal wheat bread. Eur J Nutr. 2008;47:417-23.
12. Kim WK, Chung MK, Kang NE, Kim MH, Park OJ. Effect of resistant starch from corn or rice on glucose control, colonic events, and blood lipid concentrations in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. J Nutr Biochem. 2003;14:166-72.
13. Grabitske HA, Slavin JL. Low-digestible carbohydrates in practice. J Am Diet Assoc. 2008;108:1677-81.
14. Behall KM, Scholfield DJ, Hallfrisch JG, Liljeberg-Elmstahl HG. Consumption of both resistant starch and beta-glucan improves postprandial plasma glucose and insulin in women. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:976-81.
15. Pond WG, Lei XG. Of pigs and people. In: Lewis AJ, Southern LL, editors. Swine nutrition. 2nd ed. New York: CRC Press; 2001. p. 3-18.
16. Spurlock ME, Gabler NK. The development of porcine models of obesity and the metabolic syndrome. J Nutr. 2008;138:397-402.
17. Germaine KA, Samman S, Fryirs CG, Griffiths PJ, Johnson SK, Quail KJ. Comparison of in vitro starch digestibility methods for predicting the glycaemic index of grain foods. J Sci Food Agric. 2008;88:652-8.
18. McCleary BV, McNally M, Rossiter P. Measurement of resistant starch by enzymatic digestion in starch and selected plant materials: collaborative study. J AOAC Int. 2002;85:1103-11.
19. Hooda S, Matte JJ, Wilkinson CW, Zijlstra RT. Technical note: an improved surgical model for the long-term studies of kinetics and quantification of nutrient absorption in swine. J Anim Sci. 2009;87:2013-9.
20. NRC. Nutrient requirements of swine. 10th rev. ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1998.
21. Rérat AA, Vaissade P, Vaugelade P. Absorption kinetics of some carbohydrates in conscious pigs. 2. Quantitative aspects. Br J Nutr. 1984;51:517-29.
22. Fekedulegn D, Mac Siurtain MP, Colbert JJ. Parameter estimation of nonlinear growth models in forestry. Silva Fennica. 1999;33:327-36.
23. Van Kempen T, Pujol S, Tibble S, Balfagon A. In vitro characterization of starch digestion and its implications for pigs. In: Wiseman J, Varley MA, McOrist S, Kemp B, editors. Paradigms in pig science. Nottingham (UK): Nottingham University Press; 2007. p. 515-26.
24. Siegel JA, Urbain JL, Adler LP, Charkes ND, Maurer AH, Krevsky B, Knight LC, Fisher RS, Malmud LS. Biphasic nature of gastric emptying. Gut. 1988;29:85-9.
25. Camilleri M, Malagelada JR, Brown ML, Becker G, Zinsmeister AR. Relation between antral motility and gastric emptying of solids and liquids in humans. Am J Physiol. 1985;249:G580-5.
26. O'Dea K,Wong S. The rate of starch hydrolysis in vitro does not predict the metabolic responses to legumes in vivo. Am J Clin Nutr. 1983;38:382-7.
27. Champ M. Determination of resistant starch in foods and food products: interlaboratory study. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1992;46 Suppl 2:S51-62.
28. Annison G, Topping DL. Nutritional role of resistant starch: chemical structure vs physiological function. Annu Rev Nutr. 1994;14:297-320. (Pubitemid 24261840)
29. Thorne MJ, Thompson LU, Jenkins DJ. Factors affecting starch digestibility and the glycemic response with special reference to legumes. Am J Clin Nutr. 1983;38:481-8.
30. Woerle HJ, Meyer C, Dostou JM, Gosmanov NR, Islam N, Popa E, Wittlin SD, Welle SL, Gerich JE. Pathways for glucose disposal after meal ingestion in humans. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2003;284:E716-25.
31. MacGregor AW, Ballance DL. Hydrolysis of large and small starch granules from normal and waxy barley cultivars by alpha-amylases from barley malt. Cereal Chem. 1980;57:397-402.
32. Ziessman HA, Fahey FH, Collen MJ. Biphasic solid and liquid gastric emptying in normal controls and diabetics using continuous acquisition in LAO view. Dig Dis Sci. 1992;37:744-50.
33. Liddle RA. Regulation of pancreatic secretion. In: Johnson LR, Barret KE, Gishan FK, Merchant JL, Said HM, Wood JD, editors. Physiology of the gastrointestinal tract. 4th ed. Maryland Heights (MO): Elsevier Inc.; 2006. p. 1397-435.
34. Huntington GB, Harmon DL, Richards CJ. Sites, rates, and limits of starch digestion and glucose metabolism in growing cattle. J Anim Sci. 2006;84 Suppl:E14-24.
35. Lefebvre RA, Dick JM, Guerin S, Malbert CH. Involvement of NO in gastric emptying of semi-solid meal in conscious pigs. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2005;17:229-35.
36. Wu G, Knabe DA, Yan W, Flynn NE. Glutamine and glucose metabolism in enterocytes of the neonatal pig. Am J Physiol. 1995;268:R334-42.
37. Windmueller HG, Spaeth AE. Respiratory fuels and nitrogen metabolism in vivo in small intestine of fed rats. quantitative importance of glutamine, glutamate, and aspartate. J Biol Chem. 1980;255:107-12.
38. Englyst HN, Kingman SM, Hudson GJ, Cummings JH. Measurement of resistant starch in vitro and in vivo. Br J Nutr. 1996;75:749-55.