Dissociable neural patterns of facial identity across changes in viewpoint

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 22, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 1570-1582

  Natu, Vaidehi S ^a   Jiang, Fang ^b   Narvekar, Abhijit ^a   Keshvari, Shaiyan ^c   Blanz, Volker ^d   O'Toole, Alice J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

^c RICE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SIEGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FACE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NERVE POTENTIAL; NORMAL HUMAN; OCCIPITAL CORTEX; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECOGNITION; TEMPORAL CORTEX;

ADULT; BRAIN MAPPING; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OCCIPITAL LOBE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; TEMPORAL LOBE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77953775177     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: 15308898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21312     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Andrews, T. J., & Ewbank, M. P. (2004). Distinct representations for facial identity and changeable aspects of faces in the human temporal lobe. Neuroimage, 23, 905-913.
2. Barton, J. J. S., Press, D. Z., Keenan, J. P., & O'Connor, M. (2002). Lesions of the fusiform face area impair perception of facial configuration in prosopagnosia. Neurology, 58, 71-78.
3. Blanz, V., & Vetter, T. (1999). A morphable model for the synthesis of 3D faces. In SIGGRAPH'99: Proceedings of the 26th annual conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques (pp. 187-194). New York: ACM Press/Addison-Wesley.
4. Carlson, T. A., Schrater, P., & He, S. (2003). Patterns of activity in the categorical representations of objects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 704-717. (Pubitemid 36871884)
5. Cox, D., & Savoy, R. (2003). Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) "brain reading": Detecting and classifying distributed patterns of fMRI activity in human visual cortex. Neuroimage, 19, 261-270.
6. Damasio, A. R., Damasio, H., & Van Hoesen, G. W. (1982). Prosopagnosia: Anatomical basis and neurobehavioral mechanism. Neurology, 32, 331-341.
7. Dricot, L., Sorger, B., Schiltz, C., Goebel, R., & Rossion, B. (2008). The roles of "face" and "non-face" areas during individual face discrimination: Evidence by fMRI adaptation in a brain-damaged prosopagnosic patient. Neuroimage, 40, 318-332.
8. Edelman, S., Grill-Spector, K., Kushnir, T., & Malach, R. (1998). Toward direct visualization of the internal shape representation space by fMRI. Psychobiology, 26, 309-321. (Pubitemid 29068426)
9. Eger, E., Ashburner, J., Haynes, J. D., Dolan, R. J., & Rees, G. (2008). fMRI activity patterns in human loc carry information about object exemplars within category. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 356-370. (Pubitemid 351159095)
10. Eger, E., Schweinberger, S. R., Dolan, R. J., & Henson, R. N. (2005). Familiarity enhances invariance of face representations in human ventral visual cortex: fMRI evidence. Neuroimage, 26, 1128-1139. (Pubitemid 40806491)
11. Ewbank, M. P., & Andrews, T. J. (2008). Differential sensitivity for viewpoint between familiar and unfamiliar faces in human visual cortex. Neuroimage, 40, 1857-1870.
12. Fang, F., Murray, S. O., & He, S. (2006). Duration-dependent fMRI adaptation and distributed viewer-centered face representation in human visual cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 1402-1411. (Pubitemid 47343628)
13. Fox, C. J., Iaria, G., & Barton, J. (2009). Defining the face-processing network: Optimization of the functional localizer in fMRI. Human Brain Mapping, 30, 1637-1651.
14. Fox, C. J., Moon, S.-Y., Iaria, G., & Barton, J. S. (2009). The correlates of subjective perception of identity and expression in the face network: An fMRI adaptation study. Neuroimage, 44, 569-580.
15. Ganel, T., & Goshen-Gottstein, Y. (2004). Effects of familiarity on the perceptual integrality of the identity and expression of faces: The parallel-route hypothesis revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 583-597. (Pubitemid 38726726)
16. Gilaie-Dotan, S., & Malach, R. (2007). Sub-exemplar shape tuning in human face-related areas. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 325-338. (Pubitemid 46052771)
17. Grill-Spector, K., Knouf, N., & Kanwisher, N. (2004). The fusiform face area subserves face perception, not generic within-category identification. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 555-562. (Pubitemid 38544596)
18. Grill-Spector, K., Kushnir, T., Hendler, T., Edelman, S., Itzchak, Y., & Malach, R. (1999). Differential processing of objects under various viewing conditions in human lateral occipital complex. Neuron, 24, 187-203. (Pubitemid 29466158)
19. Hadjikhani, N., & De Gelder, B. (2002). Neural basis of prosopagnosia: An fMRI study. Human Brain Mapping, 16, 176-182. (Pubitemid 34743289)
20. Hancock, P. J. B., Bruce, V., & Burton, A. M. (2000). Recognition of unfamiliar faces. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 330-337.
21. Hanson, S. J., Matsuka, T., & Haxby, J. V. (2004). Combinatorial codes in ventral temporal lobe for object recognition: Haxby (2001) revisited: Is there a face area? Neuroimage, 23, 156-166.
22. Haushofer, J., Livingstone, M., & Kanwisher, N. (2008). Multivariate patterns in object-selective cortex dissociate perceptual and physical similarity. PLoS Biology, 29, 1459-1467.
23. Haxby, J., Hoffman, E., & Gobbini, M. (2002). Human neural systems for face recognition and social communication. Biological Psychiatry, 51, 59-67. (Pubitemid 34093794)
24. Haxby, J. V., Gobbini, M. I., Furey, M. L., Ishai, A., Schouten, J. L., & Pietrini, P. (2001). Distributed and overlapping representation of faces and objects in ventral temporal cortex. Science, 293, 2425-2430. (Pubitemid 32917318)
25. Haxby, J. V., Hoffman, E. A., & Gobbini, M. I. (2000). The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 223-233. (Pubitemid 30332148)
26. Henson, R. N., Shallice, T., & Dolan, R. J. (2000). Neuroimaging evidence for dissociable forms of repetition priming. Science, 287, 1269-1272. (Pubitemid 30112149)
27. Hoffman, E. A., & Haxby, J. V. (2000). Distinct representations of eye gaze and identity in the distributed human neural system for face perception. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 80-84.
28. Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M. (1997). The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 4302-4311. (Pubitemid 27220621)
29. Kriegeskorte, N., Formisano, E., Sorger, B., & Goebel, R. (2007). Individual faces elicit distinct response patterns in human anterior temporal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A., 104, 20600-20605.
30. Leopold, D. A., O'Toole, A. J., Vetter, T., & Blanz, V. (2001). Prototype referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 89-94. (Pubitemid 32095531)
31. Mai, J. K., Assheuer, J., & Paxinos, G. (1997). Atlas of the human brain. San Diego: Academic Press.
32. Op de Beeck, H., Wagemans, J., & Vogels, R. (2001). Inferotemporal neurons represent low-dimensional configurations of parameterized shapes. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 1244-1252. (Pubitemid 33135631)
33. O'Toole, A. J., Jiang, F., Abdi, H., & Haxby, J. V. (2005). Partially distributed representations of objects and faces in ventral temporal cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 580-590. (Pubitemid 40478281)
34. Pageler, N. M., Menon, V., Merin, N. M., Eliez, S., Brown, W. E., & Reiss, A. L. (2003). Effect of head orientation on gaze processing in fusiform gyrus and superior temporal sulcus. Neuroimage, 20, 318-329. (Pubitemid 37188520)
35. Pelphrey, K. A., Viola, R. J., & McCarthy, G. (2004). When strangers pass: Processing of mutual and averted social gaze in the superior temporal sulcus. Psychological Science, 15, 598-603.
36. Pourtois, G., Schwartz, S., Seghier, M. L., Lazeyras, F., & Vuilleumier, P. (2005a). Portraits or people? Distinct representations of face identity in the human visual cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 1043-1057. (Pubitemid 41045577)
37. Pourtois, G., Schwartz, S., Seghier, M. L., Lazeyras, F., & Vuilleumier, P. (2005b). View-independent coding of face identity in frontal and temporal cortices is modulated by familiarity: An event-related fMRI study. Neuroimage, 24, 1214-1224. (Pubitemid 40164523)
38. Pourtois, G., Schwartz, S., Spiridon, M., Martuzzi, R., & Vuilleumier, P. (2009). Object representations for multiple visual categories overlap in lateral occipital and medial fusiform cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 1806-1819.
39. Rotshtein, P., Henson, R. N. A., Treves, A., Driver, J., & Dolan, R. J. (2005). Morphing Marilyn into Maggie dissociates physical and identity face-representations in the brain. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 107-113. (Pubitemid 41236739)
40. Spiridon, M., & Kanwisher, N. (2002). How distributed is visual category information in human occipito-temporal cortex? An fMRI study. Neuron, 35, 1157-1165. (Pubitemid 35279542)
41. Troje, N. F., & Bülthoff, H. H. (1996). Face recognition under varying pose: The role of texture and shape. Vision Research, 36, 1761-1771.
42. Valentin, D., Abdi, H., & O'Toole A. J. (1994). Categorization and identification of human face images by neural networks: A review of linear auto-associator and principal component approaches. Journal of Biological Systems, 2, 413-429.
43. Vetter, T., & Troje, N. F. (1997). Separation of texture and shape in images of faces for image coding and synthesis. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 14, 2152-2161. (Pubitemid 127567257)
44. Young, M. P., & Yamane, S. (1992). Sparse population coding of faces in the inferotemporal cortex. Science, 256, 1327-1331.
45. Yovel, G., & Kanwisher, N. (2004). Face perception; domain specific, not process specific. Neuron, 44, 889-898. (Pubitemid 39575640)
46. Yovel, G., & Kanwisher, N. (2005). The neural basis of the behavioral face-inversion effect. Current Biology, 15, 2256-2262. (Pubitemid 41790620)
47. Yuille, A., & Kersten, D. (2006). Vision as Bayesian inference: Analysis by synthesis? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 301-308.