Automated design of an industrial robot family

Proceedings of the ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference 2009, DETC2009

Volumn 5, Issue PART B, 2010, Pages 927-939

  Mandl, Clemens ^a   Ölvander, Johan ^b   Feng, Xiaolong ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES TECHNIKUM WIEN   (Austria)

^b LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c ABB CORPORATE RESEARCH   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

3D DESIGN TOOLS; AUTOMATED DESIGN; AUTOMATIC DESIGN; CONTINUOUS DESIGN VARIABLES; DISCRETE VARIABLES; GEOMETRIC DATA; INTEGRATED TOOLS; KINEMATICS AND DYNAMICS; MIXED-VARIABLE DESIGN OPTIMIZATIONS; MULTI OBJECTIVE; PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS; PHYSICAL DATA; ROBOT KINEMATICS; SOLIDWORKS;

AUTOMATION; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; INDUSTRIAL ROBOTS; INDUSTRY; KINEMATICS; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION;

MACHINE DESIGN;

EID: 77953752244     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1115/DETC2009-86613     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Fellini R., Kokoloras M., Papalambros P., Perez-Duarte A., "Platform Selection Under Performance Bounds in Optimal Design of Product Families", Journal of Mechanical Design, vol.127, pp. 524-535, July, 2005
2. Nelson, S., Parkinson M., Papalambros P., "Multicriteria Optimization in Product Platform Design", Journal of Mechanical Design, vol.123, pp 199-204, June 2001.
3. Jose A. and Tollenaere M., "Modular and platform methods for product family design: literature analysis", Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 16, pp. 371-390, 2005.
4. Simpson, T. W., Product Platform Design and Optimization: Status and Promise, ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences - Design Automation Conference, Chicago, IL, Paper No. DETC2003/DAC-48717, 2003.
5. Fujita K., Yoshida H., "Product Variety Optimization Simultaneously Designing Module Combination and Module Attributes", Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, vol.12, nr2, June 2004.
6. Jiao J., Zhang Y., Wang Y, A Generic Genetic Algorithm for product family design, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2007.
7. Simpson T., D'Souza B., Assessing Variable Levels of Platform Commonality within a Product Family Using a Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm, Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, 12(2) pp 199-1129, 2004.
8. Saitou, K., Izui, K., Nishiwaki, S. and Paplalambros P., 2005. A Survey of Structural Optimization in Mechanical Product Development. Providence -University of Michigan: Department of Mechanical Engineering.
9. Shannon R.E., 1975. Systems Simulation: the art and science. Prentice-Hall.
10. Ölvander J., Feng X., and Holmgren B., "Optimal Kinematics Design of an Industrial Robot Family", in Proceedings of the ASME 2008 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences, (DETC2008-49645), 2008.
11. Tarkian M., Ölvander J., Lunden B., Integration of Parametric CAD and Dynamic Models for Industrial Robot Design and Optimization, ASME Design Automation Conference, New York, August 3-6, 2008
12. SolidWorks Corporation, 2007. API-Help. Providence: SolidWorks.
13. Khajavirad, A. and Michalek, J., An Extension of the Commonality Index for Product Family Optimization, ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences -Design Automation Conference, Las Vegas, NV, DETC2007/DAC-35605, 2007.
14. Thevenot H., Simpson T., Commonality indices for product family design: a detailed comparison, Journal of Engineering Design, Vol.17, No.2, pp 99-119, 2006.
15. Goldberg, D., 1989. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning. Addison Wesley
16. Mehnen, L., 2006. Artificial intelligence: informed search.
17. Katalinic, B., 1990. Industrieroboter und flexible Fertigungssysteme fur Drehteile. 1. Auflage. Düsseldorf: VDI Verlag.