The influence of agent reliability on trust in human-agent collaboration

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn 369, Issue , 2008, Pages

  Fan, Xiaocong ^a   Oh, Sooyoung ^b   McNeese, Michael ^b   Yen, John ^b   Cuevas, Haydee ^c   Strater, Laura ^c   Endsley, Mica R ^c  

^a BEHREND COLLEGE   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c SA Technologies   (United States)

Author keywords

agent; automation usage decisions; reliability; trust

Indexed keywords

AGENT COLLABORATION; AGENT'S RELIABILITY; COGNITIVE AGENTS; COMMAND AND CONTROL; CRITICAL ISSUES; DECISION AIDS; EXPERIMENTAL APPROACHES; HUMAN OPERATOR; NASA-TLX; REAL-WORLD; RESEARCH APPROACH; SITUATION AWARENESS; SYSTEM FAILURES; SYSTEMATIC FAILURE; TEAM PERFORMANCE;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; AUTOMATION; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; INTELLIGENT AGENTS; NASA; RELIABILITY; SYSTEMS ENGINEERING;

ERGONOMICS;

EID: 77953729494     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1473018.1473028     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Bradshaw, J.; Sierhuis, M.; Acquisti, A.; Gawdiak, Y.; Prescott, D.; Jeffers, R.; Suri, N.; and van Hoof, R. 2002. What we can learn about human-agent teamwork from practice. In Workshop on Teamwork and Coalition Formation, Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems (AAMAS 02).
2. Cannon-Bowers, J. A.; Salas, E.; and Converse, S. 1990. Cognitive psychology and team training: Training shared mental models and complex systems. Human Factors Society Bulletin 33:1-4.
3. Cohen, P. R., and Levesque, H. J. 1991. Teamwork. Nous 25(4):487-512.
4. Deutsch, M. 1960. The effect of motivational orientation upon trust and suspicion. Human Relations 13:123-139.
5. Dzindolet, M. T.; Peterson, S. A.; Pomranky, R. A.; Pierce, L. G.; and Beck, H. P. 2003. The role of trust in automation reliance. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 58:697-719.
6. Endsley, M. 1995. Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors 37:32-64.
7. Fan, X., and Yen, J. 2007. R-CAST: Integrating team intelligence for human-centered teamwork. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Second National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI'07), 1535-1541.
8. Fan, X.; Sun, B.; Sun, S.; McNeese, M.; and Yen, J. 2006. RPD-enabled agents teaming with humans for multicontext decision making. In Proceedings of the fifth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems, 34-41. ACM Press.
9. Fan, X.; Yen, J.; and Volz, R. A. 2005. A theoretical framework on proactive information exchange in agent teamwork. Artificial Intelligence 169:23-97.
10. Kaber, D. B., and Endsley, M. R. 2004. The effects of level of automation and adaptive automation on human performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 5(2):113-153.
11. Klein, G. A. 1997. The recognition-primed decision (rpd) model: Looking back, looking forward. In Naturalistic decision making (Eds: C. E. Zsambok and G. Klein). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. 285-292.
12. Lee, J. D., and See, K. A. 2004. Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors 46(1):50-80.
13. Lennox, T. L.; Payne, T.; Hahn, S. K.; Lewis, M.; and Sycara, K. 1999. MokSAF: How should we support teamwork in human-agent teams? Technical Report CMU-RITR- 99-31, Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, PA.
14. Norling, E.; Sonenberg, L.; and Ronnquist, R. 2000. Enhancing multi-agent based simulation with human-like decision making strategies. In Moss, S., and Davidsson, P., eds., Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Multi-Agent Based Simulation, 214-228.
15. Norling, E. 2004. Folk psychology for human modelling: Extending the BDI paradigm. In AAMAS '04: International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi Agent Systems, 202-209.
16. Parasuraman, R., and Riley, V. 1997. Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors 39(2):230-253.