Visible technologies, invisible organisations: An empirical study of public beliefs about electricity supply networks

Energy Policy

Volumn 38, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 4127-4134

  Devine Wright, Patrick ^a   Devine Wright, Hannah ^b   Sherry Brennan, Fionnguala ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

^b Placewise Ltd   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Electricity supply networks; Planning; Public beliefs

Indexed keywords

CARBON EMISSIONS; ELECTRICITY NETWORKS; ELECTRICITY SUPPLY; ELECTRICITY SUPPLY NETWORK; ELECTRICITY SUPPLY NETWORKS; ELECTRICITY TRANSMISSION; EMPIRICAL STUDIES; ENERGY SYSTEMS; GOVERNMENT MINISTERS; LOCAL RESIDENTS; NATIONAL GRID; NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE; POWER LINES; PUBLIC SUPPORT; RESEARCH STUDIES; TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION;

DECISION MAKING; DISTRIBUTED PARAMETER NETWORKS; ELECTRICITY;

ELECTRIC NETWORK ANALYSIS;

CARBON EMISSION; DECISION MAKING; ELECTRICITY GENERATION; ELECTRICITY SUPPLY; ENERGY POLICY; PLANNING METHOD;

UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 77953724964     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.03.039     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Allum N., Boy D., Bauer M.W. European regions and the knowledge deficit model. Biotechnology: The making of a Global Controversy 2002, 224-243. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. M.W. Bauer, G. Gaskell (Eds.).
2. Bauer M.W., Allum N., Miller S. What can we learn from 25 years of PUS survey research? Liberating and expanding the agenda. Public Understanding of Science 2007, 16(1):79-95.
3. Burningham K., Barnett J., Carr A., Clift R., Wehrmeyer W. Industrial constructions of publics and public knowledge: a qualitative investigation of practice in the UK chemicals industry. Public Understanding of Science 2007, 16(1):23-43.
4. Butler, S., 2001. UK Electricity Networks: the nature of UK electricity transmission and distribution networks in an intermittent renewable and embedded electricity generation future. Available online: (last accessed 12th March 2010). http://www.parliament.uk/post/e5.pdf.
5. Carbon Trust, 2005. The Carbon Trust and DTI Renewables Network Impacts Study. Available online: (last accessed 5th November, 2009). http://www.carbontrust.co.uk/Publications/publicationdetail.htm?productid=CT-2004-03.
6. Devine-Wright H., Devine-Wright P. Social representations of electricity network technologies: exploring processes of anchoring and objectification through the use of visual research methods. British Journal of Social Psychology 2009, 48:357-373.
7. Devine-Wright, H., Devine-Wright, P., Sherry-Brennan, F. A 'Precondition for Successful Modern Life'? An empirical study of public beliefs about electricity supply failure. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, under review.
8. Draper G., Vincent T., Kroll M.E., Swanson J. Childhood cancer in relation to distance from high voltage power lines in England and Wales: a case-control study. British Medical Journal 2005, 330(7503):1290. June 4.
9. Firestone J., Kempton W. Public opinion about large offshore wind power: underlying factors. Energy Policy 2007, 35(3):1584-1598.
10. Graham S., Marvin S. Cherry picking and social dumping: utilities in the 1990s. Utilities Policy 1994, 4(2):113-119.
11. H.M.Government The UK Low Carbon Transition Plan: National Strategy for Climate and Energy 2009, The Stationary Office, London.
12. Ipsos MORI Customer Engagement Survey: Report prepared for Ofgem 2008, Ofgem, London.
13. Jay S. The forces shaping local planning policy on high voltage electricity installations. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 2004, 6(3):207-226.
14. Joffe H. Risk: from perception to social representation. British Journal of Social Psychology 2003, 42:55-73.
15. Joffe H., Yardley L. Content and thematic analysis. Research Methods for Clinical and Health Psychology 2003, 56-68. Sage, London. D. Marks, L. Yardley (Eds.).
16. Kirkup, J., 2008. Nuclear plans could mean miles of giant pylons. The Telegraph. 11 June 2008. Available online: (last accessed 5th November 2009). http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/earthnews/3344158/Nuclear-plans-could-mean-miles-of-giant-pylons.html.
17. Moscovici S. The myth of the lonely paradigm: a rejoinder. Social Research 1984, 51(4):939.
18. Moscovici S. Social psychology and developmental psychology: extending the conversation. Social Representations and the Development of Knowledge 1990, 164-185. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. G. Duveen, B. Lloyd (Eds.).
19. McGowan, F., Sauter, R., 2005. Public opinion on energy research: a desk study for the research councils. Sussex Energy Group, SPRU, University of Sussex.
20. National Grid, 2008. Annual Report and Accounts 2007/08. Available online: (last accessed 5th November 2009). http://www.nationalgrid.com/annualreports/2008/05_operating_fin_review/ofrtransmission.html.
21. National Grid plc., 2009. Operating the electricity transmission networks in 2020: initial consultation. Available online: (last accessed 12th March 2010). http://www.nationalgrid.com/NR/rdonlyres/32879A26-D6F2-4D82-9441-40FB2B0E2E0C/39517/Operatingin2020Consulation1.pdf.
22. O'Carroll, M., 2002. Revolt public statement, July 2002. Available online: (last accessed 5th November 2009). http://www.revolt.co.uk/textfile/sup0702.txt.
23. Parkhill, K., Pidgeon, N., Henwood,K., Simmons, P., Venables,D., 2009. From the familiar to the extraordinary: local residents' perceptions of risk when living with nuclear power in UK. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 35 (1), 39-58.
24. Patterson W. Keeping the Lights on: Towards Sustainable Electricity 2007, Earthscan, London.
25. Pidgeon N., Lorenzoni I., Poortinga W. Climate change or nuclear power-no thanks! A quantitative study of public perceptions of risk framing in Britain. Global Environmental Change 2008, 18:69-85.
26. Priestley T., Evans G.W. Resident perceptions of a nearby electric transmission line. Journal of Environmental Psychology 1996, 16:65-74.
27. Qualter A. A source of power: young children's understanding of where electricity comes from. Research in Science and Technological Education 1995, 13(2):177-186.
28. Saint Consulting, 2009. National Survey of Opposition to Power Transmission Lines. Available online: (last accessed 5th November 2009). http://tscg.biz/saintblog/2009/05/national-survey-opposition-to-power-transmission-lines.html.
29. Shove E., Chappells H. Ordinary consumption and extraordinary relations: utilties and their users. Ordinary Consumption 2001, 57-99. Routledge, London. A. Warde, J. Gronow (Eds.).
30. Sustainable Development Commission, 2007. Lost in Transmission: the role of Ofgem in a changing climate. Available online: (last accessed March 12th 2010). http://www.sd-commission.org.uk/publications/downloads/SDC_ofgem_report.pdf.
31. The Royal Academy of Engineering, 2004. The cost of generating electricity. Available online: (last accessed 5th November 2009). http://www.raeng.org.uk/news/publications/list/reports/cost_of_Generating_Electricity.pdf.
32. Wagner W., Hayes N. Everyday Discourse and Common Sense: the Theory of Social Representations 2005, Palgrave, London.
33. Walker, G., Devine-Wright, P., Hunter, S., High, H., Evans, B. Trust and community: exploring the meanings, contexts and dynamics of community renewable energy. Energy Policy, forthcoming.
34. Wynne, B., 1982. Rationality and ritual: the windscale inquiry and nuclear decisions in Britain. Bucks: The British Society for the History of Science.