Evaluation of non-point source pollution reduction by applying Best Management Practices using a SWAT model and QuickBird high resolution satellite imagery

Journal of Environmental Sciences

Volumn 22, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 826-833

  Lee, MiSeon ^a   Park, Geunae ^a   Park, MinJi ^a   Park, JongYoon ^a   Lee, JiWan ^a   Kim, SeongJoon ^a  

^a Konkuk University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Best management practice; Land use; Non point source; QuickBird; Soil and Water Assessment Tool

Indexed keywords

BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE; BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES; NON-POINT SOURCE; QUICKBIRD; SOIL AND WATER ASSESSMENT TOOLS;

LAND USE; LANDFORMS; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; PHOSPHORUS; SATELLITE IMAGERY; SEDIMENT TRANSPORT; SOILS; STREAM FLOW; WATER POLLUTION; WATER QUALITY; WATERSHEDS;

GEOLOGIC MODELS;

WATER; SOIL; WATER POLLUTANT;

BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE; GIS; NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION; POLLUTION CONTROL; QUICKBIRD; SATELLITE IMAGERY; STREAMFLOW; WATER POLLUTION; WATER QUALITY; WATERSHED;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; SOIL; SPACE FLIGHT; THEORETICAL MODEL; TIME; WATER POLLUTANT; WATER POLLUTION; ANALYSIS; PREVENTION AND CONTROL;

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; MODELS, THEORETICAL; SOIL; SPACECRAFT; TIME FACTORS; WATER; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL; WATER POLLUTION, CHEMICAL;

EID: 77953717171     PISSN: 10010742     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1001-0742(09)60184-4     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Arnold JG, Srinivasan R, Muttiah RS, Williams JR Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part I: model development. Journal of American Water Resources Association 1998, 34(1):73-89.
2. Arnold JG, Fohrer N SWAT2000: Current capabilities and research opportunities in applied watershed modelling. Hydrological Processes 2005, 19(3):563-572.
3. Borah DK, Bera M Watershed-scale hydrologic and nonpoint-source pollution models: Review of applications. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Engineers 2004, 47(3):789-803.
4. Crist EP A TM Tasseled Cap equivalent transformation for reflectance factor data. Remote Sensing of Environment 1985, 17(3):306-310.
5. Guber A K, Pachepsky Y A, Sadeghi A M, 2007. Evaluating uncertainty in E. coli retention in vegetated filter strips in locations selected with SWAT simulations. In: Watershed Management to Meet Water Quality Standards and TMDL (total maximum daily load) Proceedings. ASABE Publication no. 701P0207. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, MI.
6. Hart MR, Quin BF, Nguyen ML Phosphorus runoff from agricultural land and direct fertilizer effects: a review. Journal of Environmental Quality 2004, 33:1954-1972.
7. Inamdar SP, Mostaghimi S, McClellan PW, Brannan KM BMP impacts on sediment and nutrient yields from an agricultural watershed in the coastal plain region. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Engineers 2001, 44(5):1191-1200.
8. Kim SH, Lee MS, Park GA, Kim SJ Application of QuickBird satellite image to storm runoff modeling. Korean Journal of Remote Sensing 2007, 23(1):15-20.
9. Lee M S, Park J Y, Jung I K, Kim S J, 2008. Estimation of spatial soil loss using the land use information of QuickBird Satellite Imagery. ASABE Meeting Paper, no. 083876. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, MI.
10. Legates DR, McCabe GJ Evaluating the use of goodness of fit measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation. Water Resource Research 1999, 35(1):233-241.
11. Line DE, Line Daniel E, Jennings GD, McLaughlin RA, Osmond DL, Harman WA, et al. Nonpoint sources. Water Environment Research 1999, 71(5):1054-1069.
12. Line DE, Osmond DL, Coffey SW, Arnold JA, Gale JA, Spooner J, et al. Nonpoint sources. Water Environment Research 1994, 66(4):586-601.
13. Mishra SK, Tyagi JV, Singh VP, Singh R SCS-CN-based modeling of sediment yield. Journal of Hydrology 2006, 324:301-322.
14. Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part I: A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology 1970, 10(3):282-290.
15. Neitsch SL, Arnold JG, Kiniry JR, Williams JR Soil and water assessment tool theoretical documentation version 2000: Draft-April 2001 2001, Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, Blackland Research Center, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Temple, TX, USA.
16. Neitsch SL, Arnold JG, Kiniry JR, Williams JR Soil and water assessment tool theoretical documentation version 2005: January, 2005 2005, Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, Blackland Research Center, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Temple, TX, USA.
17. Novotny V, Olem H Water Quality Prevention, Identification, and Management of Diffuse Pollution 1994, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
18. Park GF Soil erosion risk assessment of the Geumho river watershed using GIS and RUSLE methods. The Korean Association of Geographic Information Studied 2003, 6(4):24-36.
19. Park SW, Mostaghimi S, Cooke RA, McClellan PW BMP impacts on watershed runoff, sediment and nutrient yields. Water Resources Bulletin 1994, 30(6):1011-1023.
20. Santhi C, Arnold JG, Williams JR, Dugas WA, Srinivassn R, Hauck LM Validation of the SWAT model on a large river basin with point and nonpoint sources. Water Resources Association 2001, 37(5):1169-1188.
21. Shin G J, 1999. The analysis of soil erosion analysis in watershed using GIS. Ph.D. Thesis. Department of Civil Engineering, Gangwon National University.
22. Spooner J, Huffman RL, Line DE, Gale JA, Jennings GD, Coffey SW, et al. Nonpoint sources. Water Environment Research 1992, 64(4):503-514.
23. SWCS (Soil and Water Conservation Society) Realizing the promise of conservation buffer technology 2001, Soil and Water Conservation Society, Ames, IA.
24. Torbert HA, Potter KN, Hoffman DW, Gerik TJ, Richardson CW Surface residue and soil moisture affect fertilizer loss in simulated runoff on a heavy clay soil. Agronomy Journal 1999, 91:606-612.
25. USDA SCS (Soil Conservation Service), 1972. National Engineering Handbook. Section 4: Hydrology. Chapters 4-10.
26. USDA SWAT: Peer-reviewed publications. Temple, Texas: USDA-ARS Grassland, Soil and Water Laboratory http://www.brc.tamus.edu/swat/pubspeerreview.html.
27. Vennix S A, Northcott W J, 2002. Prioritizing vegetative buffer strips within agricultural watershed. ASAE Meeting Paper, no. 022135. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Engineers, St. Joseph, MI.
28. Williams JR Sediment routing for agricultural watersheds. Water Resources Bull 1975, 11:965-974.
29. Williams JR The EPIC model. Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology 1995, 909-1000. Water Resources Publications, Chapter 25. V.P. Singh (Ed.).
30. Williams JR, Berndt HD Sediment yield prediction based on watershed hydrology. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Engineers 1977, 20(6):1100-1104.
31. Withers PJA, Clay SD, Breeze VG Phosphorus transfer in runoff following application of fertilizer, manure, and sewage sludge. Journal of Environmental Quality 2001, 30:180-188.