External facial features modify the representation of internal facial features in the fusiform face area

NeuroImage

Volumn 52, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 720-725

  Axelrod, Vadim ^a   Yovel, Galit ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN REGION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FACIES; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PHOTOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL MEMORY; VISUAL STIMULATION; VOLUNTEER; ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; FACE; HAIR; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; TEMPORAL LOBE; VISION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADULT; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FACE; FEMALE; HAIR; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; TEMPORAL LOBE; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77953715128     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.04.027     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Andrews T.J., Davies-Thompson J., Kingstone A., Young A.W. Internal and external features of the face are represented holistically in face-selective regions of visual cortex. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30:3544-3552.
2. Axelrod, V., Yovel, G., in press. Non-preferred stimuli modify the representation of faces in the fusiform face area. J. Cogn. Neurosci. http://doi:10.1162/jocn.2010.21481.
3. Betts L.R., Wilson H.R. Heterogeneous Structure in Face-selective Human Occipito-temporal Cortex. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2009, Retrieved: October 5, 2009. doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21346.
4. Brainard D.H. The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spat Vis 1997, 10:433-436.
5. Duchaine B., Nakayama K. The Cambridge Face Memory Test: results for neurologically intact individuals and an investigation of its validity using inverted face stimuli and prosopagnosic participants. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44:576-585.
6. Ewbank M.P., Andrews T.J. Differential sensitivity for viewpoint between familiar and unfamiliar faces in human visual cortex. Neuroimage 2008, 40:1857-1870.
7. Gilaie-Dotan S., Malach R. Sub-exemplar shape tuning in human face-related areas. Cereb. Cortex 2007, 17:325-338.
8. Goffaux V., Rossion B. Face inversion disproportionately impairs the perception of vertical but not horizontal relations between features. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2007, 33:995-1002.
9. Grill-Spector K., Malach R. fMR-adaptation: a tool for studying the functional properties of human cortical neurons. Acta Psychol. (Amst.) 2001, 107:293-321.
10. Grill-Spector K., Kushnir T., Edelman S., Avidan G., Itzchak Y., Malach R. Differential processing of objects under various viewing conditions in the human lateral occipital complex. Neuron 1999, 24:187-203.
11. Grill-Spector K., Knouf N., Kanwisher N. The fusiform face area subserves face perception, not generic within-category identification. Nat. Neurosci. 2004, 7:555-562.
12. Le Grand R., Mondloch C.J., Maurer D., Brent H.P. Neuroperception. Early visual experience and face processing. Nature 2001, 410:890.
13. Le Grand R., Mondloch C.J., Maurer D., Brent H.P. Impairment in holistic face processing following early visual deprivation. Psychol. Sci. 2004, 15:762-768.
14. Leopold D.A., Rhodes G., Muller K.M., Jeffery L. The dynamics of visual adaptation to faces. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2005, 272:897-904.
15. Mazard A., Schiltz C., Rossion B. Recovery from adaptation to facial identity is larger for upright than inverted faces in the human occipito-temporal cortex. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44:912-922.
16. Mondloch C.J., Le Grand R., Maurer D. Configural face processing develops more slowly than featural face processing. Perception 2002, 31:553-566.
17. Patterson K.E., Baddeley A.D. When face recognition fails. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Learn. 1977, 3:406-417.
18. Robbins R., McKone E. Can holistic processing be learned for inverted faces?. Cognition 2003, 88:79-107.
19. Robbins R., McKone E. No face-like processing for objects-of-expertise in three behavioral tasks. Cognition 2007, 103:34-79.
20. Rotshtein P., Henson R.N., Treves A., Driver J., Dolan R.J. Morphing Marilyn into Maggie dissociates physical and identity face representations in the brain. Nat. Neurosci. 2005, 8:107-113.
21. Sawamura H., Orban G.A., Vogels R. Selectivity of neuronal adaptation does not match response selectivity: a single-cell study of the FMRI adaptation paradigm. Neuron 2006, 49:307-318.
22. Schiltz C., Rossion B. Faces are represented holistically in the human occipito-temporal cortex. Neuroimage 2006, 32:1385-1394.
23. Sinha P., Poggio T. I think I know that face. Nature 1996, 384:404.
24. Sinha P., Poggio T. 'United' we stand. Perception 2002, 31:133.
25. Young A.W., Hellawell D., Hay D.C. Configurational information in face perception. Perception 1987, 16:747-759.
26. Yovel G., Kanwisher N. Face perception: domain specific, not process specific. Neuron 2004, 44:1-20.
27. Yovel G., Kanwisher N. The neural basis of the behavioral face-inversion effect. Curr. Biol. 2005, 15:2256-2262.