Theorizing the meso level: The household as a crucible of pro-environmental behaviour

Progress in Human Geography

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 309-327

  Reid, Louise ^a   Sutton, Philip ^b   Hunter, Colin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Conceptual approach; Environmental policy; Households; Meso level; Pro environmental behaviour; Sustainable development

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; FUTURE PROSPECT; PLANNING THEORY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; THEORETICAL STUDY;

EID: 77953711859     PISSN: 03091325     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0309132509346994     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. Abercrombie, N., Hill, S. and Turner, B. 2006: Dictionary of sociology. London: Penguin.
2. Ajzen, I. 1985: From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behaviour. In Kuhl, J. and Beckman, J. editors, Action control, from cognition to behaviour, New York: Springer, 11-39.
3. Ajzen, I. 1991: The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50, 179-211.
4. Ajzen, I. 2001: Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology 52, 27-58.
5. Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M. 1970: The prediction of behaviour from attitudinal and normative variables. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 6, 466-87.
6. Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M. 1980: Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
7. Ajzen, I. and Manstead, A.S.R. 2007: Changing health-related behaviors: an approach based on the theory of planned behavior. In van den Bos, K., Hewstone, M., de Wit, J., Schut, H. and Stroebe, M., editors, The scope of social psychology: theory and applications, New York: Psychology Press, 43-63.
8. Armitage, C. and Conner, M. 2001: Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: a meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology 40, 471-99.
9. Barr, S. 2006: Environmental action in the home: investigating the 'value-action' gap. Geography 91, 43-54.
10. Barr, S. and Gilg, A. 2005: Conceptualising and analysing household attitudes and actions to a growing environmental problem: development and application of a framework to guide local waste policy. Applied Geography 25, 226-47.
11. Batley, S.L., Colbourne, D., Fleming, P.D. and Urwin, P. 2001: Citizen versus consumer: challenges in the UK green power market. Energy Policy 29, 479-87.
12. Brenner, N. 2001: The limits to scale? Methodological reflections on scalar structuration. Progress in Human Geography 25, 591-614.
13. Bulkeley, H. and Gregson, N. 2009: Crossing the threshold: municipal waste policy and household waste generation. Environment and Planning A 41, 929-45.
14. Burton, R. 2004: Reconceptualising the 'behavioural approach' in agricultural studies: a socio psychological perspective. Journal of Rural Studies 20, 359-71.1.
15. Buzar, S., Ogden, P. and Hall, R. 2005: Households matter: the quiet demography of urban transformation. Progress in Human Geography 29, 413-36.
16. Caird, S. and Roy, R. 2006: Household ecological footprints - demographics and sustainability. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management 8, 407-29.
17. Carr, E. 2005: Development and the household: missing the point? GeoJournal 62, 71-83.
18. Chiesi, A. 2007: Measuring social capital and its effectiveness: the case of small entrepreneurs in Italy. European Sociological Review 23, 437-53.
19. Collins, C. and Chambers, S. 2005: Psychological and situational influences on commuter-transport mode choice. Environment and Behaviour 37, 640-61.
20. Collins, R. 1981: On the microfoundations of macro-sociology. American Journal of Sociology 86, 984-1014.
21. Corraliza, J. and Berenguer, J. 2000: Environmental values, beliefs and actions, a situational approach. Environment and Behaviour 32, 832-48.
22. Darnton, A. 2004: Driving public behaviours for sustainable lifestyles. Report 2 of Desk Research commissioned by COI on behalf of DEFRA. Retrieved 28 August 2009 from http://collections.europarchive.org/tna/20080530153425/http:/www.sustainable-development.gov.uk/publications/index.htm#2005.
23. Devine-Wright, P., Devine-Wright, H. and Fleming, P. 2004: Situational influences upon children's beliefs about global warming and energy. Environmental Education Research 10, 493-506.
24. Dobson, A. 1990: Green political thought. London: Routledge.
25. Dumreicher, H. and Kolb, B. 2008: Place as a social space: fields of encounter relating to the local sustainability process. Journal of Environmental Management 87, 317-28.
26. Dutta-Bergman, B. 2005: Psychographic profiling of fruit and vegetable consumption: the role of health orientation. Social Marketing Quarterly 9, 19-35.
27. Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. 1975: Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
28. Froud, J., Johal, C. and Williams, K. 2000: Representing the household: in and after national income accounting. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 13, 535-60.
29. Gatersleben, B. and Vlek, C. 1998: Household consumption, quality of life, and environmental impacts: a psychological perspective and empirical study. In Noorman, K. and Uiterkamp, T., editors, Green households? Domestic consumers, environment, and sustainability, London: Earthscan, 141-83.
30. Gatersleben, B., Steg, L. and Vlek, C. 2002: Measurement and determinants of environmentally significant consumer behaviour. Environment and Behaviour 34, 335-62.
31. Gilg, A., Barr, S. and Ford, N. 2005: Green consumption or sustainable lifestyles? Identifying the sustainable consumer. Futures 37, 481-504.
32. Gregson, N. and Lowe, M. 1995: 'Home'-making: on the spatiality of daily social reproduction in contemporary middle-class Britain. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS 20, 224-35.
33. Gregson, N., Metcalfe, A. and Crewe, L. 2007: Identity, mobility, and the throwaway society. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 25, 682-700.
34. Gronhoj, A. 2006: Communication about consumption: a family process perspective on 'green' consumer practices. Journal of Consumer Behaviour 5, 491-503.
35. Haanpaa, L. 2005: Structures in sustainable consumption research: macro- and micro-level factors affecting environmentally responsible consumption. Conference Paper presented at 'Rethinking Inequalities', 7th Conference of the European Sociological Association, Torun, Poland, 9-12 September (available from author).
36. Haller, M. 2001: Theory and method in the comparative study of values - critique and alternative to Inglehart. European Sociological Review 18, 139-58.
37. Hassler, B. 2006: Postmaterialistic environmental attitudes - from attitudinal change to behavioural intentions. Working paper, Sodertorns Hogskola University College, Sweden (available from author).
38. Hobson, K. 2003: Thinking habits into action: the role of knowledge and process in questioning household consumption practices. Local Environment 8, 95-112.
39. Hobson, K. 2006: Environmental psychology and the geographies of ethical and sustainable consumption: aligning, triangulating, challenging? Area 38, 292-300.
40. Howitt, R. 1993: 'A world in a grain of sand': towards a reconceptualisation of geographical scale. Australian Geographer 24, 33-44.
41. Hunter, C., Carmichael, K. and Pangbourne, K. 2006: Household ecological footprinting using a new diary-based data-gathering approach. Local Environment 11, 307-27.
42. Inglehart, R. 1995: Public support for environmental protection: objective problems and subjective values in 43 societies. Political Science and Politics 28, 57-72.
43. Jackson, T. 2005: Motivating sustainable consumption: a review of evidence on consumer behaviour and behavioural change. A report to the Sustainable Development Research Network. Retrieved 28 August 2009 from http://www.sd-research.org.uk/post.php?p=126.
44. Jessop, B., Brenner, N. and Jones, M. 2008: Theorizing sociospatial relations. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 26, 389-401.
45. Johnston, R., Gregory, D., Pratt, G. and Watts, M., editors 2000: The dictionary of human geography (fourth edition). Oxford: Blackwell.
46. Joireman, J., van Lange, P. and van Vugt, M. 2004: Who cares about the environmental impact of cars? Those with an eye toward the future. Environment and Behaviour 36, 187-206.
47. Jones, M. 2009: Phase space: geography, relational thinking, and beyond. Progress in Human Geography 33, 487-506.
48. Jürges, H. 2006: Gender ideology, division of housework, and the geographic mobility of families. Review of Economics of the Household 4, 299-323.
49. Kaiser, F., Wolfing, S. and Fuhrer, U. 1999: Environmental attitude and ecological behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology 19, 1-9.
50. Knussen, C., Yule, F., MacKenzie, J. and Wells, M. 2004: An analysis of intentions to recycle household waste: the roles of past behaviour, perceived habit, and perceived lack of facilities. Journal of Environmental Psychology 24, 237-46.
51. Korheren, K. and Lappalainen, A. 2004: Examining the environmental awareness of children and adolescents in the Ranomafana Region, Madagascar. Environmental Education Research 10, 195-216.
52. Krantz, H. 2005: Matter that matters: study of household routines in a process of changing water and sanitation arrangements. Doctoral dissertation, Linköping Studies in Arts and Science 316. Linköping: Department of Water and Environmental Studies, Linköping University. Retrieved 28 August 2009 from http://www.ep.liu.se/diss/arts_science/2005/316.
53. Lam, S.P. 1999: Predicting intentions to conserve water from the theory of planned behaviour, perceived moral obligation, and perceived water right. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 29, 1058-71.1.
54. Lawson, V. 1998: Hierarchical households and gendered migration in Latin America: feminist extensions to migration research. Progress in Human Geography 22, 39-53.
55. Mannetti, L., Pierro, A. and Livi, S. 2004: Recycling: planned and self-expressive behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology 24, 227-36.
56. Manson, S. 2008: Does scale exist? An epistemological scale continuum for complex human environment systems. Geoforum 39, 776-88.
57. Marston, S., Jones, P.J. and Woodward, K., 2005: Human geography without scale. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS 30, 416-32.
58. Massey, D. 1993: Questions of locality. Geography 78, 142-49.
59. Merton, R. 1968: Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press.
60. Moore, A. 2008: Rethinking scale as a geographical category: from analysis to practice. Progress in Human Geography 32, 203-25.
61. Murdoch, J. 1997: Towards a geography of heterogeneous associations. Progress in Human Geography 21, 321-36.
62. Neumann, R. 2009: Political ecology: theorizing scale. Progress in Human Geography 33, 398-406.
63. Noorman, K. and Uiterkamp, T. 1998: Green households? Domestic consumers, environment, and sustainability. London: Earthscan.
64. Norlund, A. and Garvill, J. 2002: Value structures behind proenvironmental behaviour. Environment and Behaviour 34, 740-56.
65. Office of National Statistics (ONS) 2005: General household survey 2005. Appendix A: definitions and terms. Retrieved 28 August 2009 from http://www.statistics.gov.uk/StatBase/Product.asp?vlnk=5756.
66. Olli, E., Grendstad, G. and Wollebaek, D. 2001: Correlates of environmental behaviours: bringing back social context. Environment and Behaviour 33, 118-34.
67. Penner, L., Dovidio, J., Piliavin, J. and Schroeder, D. 2005: Prosocial behaviour: multilevel perspectives. Annual Reviews Psychology 56, 365-92.
68. Peters, M. and Jackson, T. 2008: Community action: a force for social change? some conceptual observations. RESOLVE working paper 01-08. Retrieved 28 August 2009 from http://www.surrey.ac.uk/resolve/publications/index.php?pubCat_ID=4.
69. Reid, L., Hunter, C. and Sutton, P. 2009: Writing it down: suggestions for a new approach towards understanding pro-environmental behaviour. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, in press.
70. Safa, H. 2009: Hierarchies and household change in postrevolutionary Cuba. Latin American Perspectives 36, 42-52.
71. Salmela, S. and Varho, V. 2006: Consumers in the green electricity market in Finland. Energy Policy 34, 3669-83.
72. Sayre, N. 2005: Ecological and geographical scale: parallels and potential for integration. Progress in Human Geography 29, 276-90.
73. Schenk, N., Moll, H. and Uiterkamp, A. 2007: Meso-level analysis, the missing link in energy strategies. Energy Policy 35, 1505-16.
74. Schwanen, T., Kwan, M. and Ren, F. 2008: How fixed is fixed? Gendered rigidity of space-time constraints and geographies of everyday activities. Geoforum 39, 2109-21.
75. Schwartz, S.H. 1973: Normative explanations of helping behaviour: a critique, proposal, and empirical test. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 9, 349-64.
76. Sheppard, B., Hartwick., J. and Warshaw, P. 1988: The theory of reasoned action: a meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research. The Journal of Consumer Research 15, 325-43.
77. Shove, E. 2003: Comfort, cleanliness and convenience: the social organization of normality. London: Berg.
78. Sibeon, R. 1999: Anti-reductionist sociology. Sociology 33, 317-34.
79. Smith, S. 2008: Owner-occupation: at home with a hybrid of money and materials. Environment and Planning A 40, 520-35.
80. Sutton, P. 2004: Nature, environment and society. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
81. Taylor, P. 1999: Places, spaces and Macy's: place-space tensions in the political geography of modernities. Progress in Human Geography 23, 7-26.
82. Tonglet, M., Phillips, P. and Bates, M. 2004: Determining the drivers for householder pro environmental behaviour: waste minimisation compared to recycling. Resources Conservation and Recycling 42, 27-48.
83. Tudor, T., Barr, S. and Gilg, A. 2007: Strategies for improving recycling behaviour within the Cornwall National Health Service (NHS) in the UK. Waste Management and Research 25, 510-16.
84. Uzzell, D., Muckle, R., Jackson, T., Ogden, J., Barnett, J., Gatersleben, B., Hegarty, P. and Papathanasopoulou, E. 2006: Choice matters: alternative approaches to encourage sustainable consumption and production. Report to DEFRA. Retrieved 28 August 2009 from http://www.defra.gov.uk/sustainable/government/what/priority/behaviourChangeResearchAndGuidance.htm.
85. van Diepen, A.M.L. 1998: Developments in household composition in Europe. In Noorman, K. and Uiterkamp, T., editors, Green households? Domestic consumers, environment, and sustainability, London: Earthscan, 82-100.
86. Verbeek, D. and Mommaas, H. 2008: Transitions to sustainable tourism mobility: the social practices approach. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 16, 629-44.
87. Wallenborn, G. 2007: How to attribute power to consumers? When epistemology and politics converge. In Zaccaï, E., editor, Sustainable consumption, ecology and fair trade, London: Routledge, 57-69.
88. Yi, Y., Hartloff, S. and Meyer, P. 1999: Factors affecting household-level environmental decision-making: a three-country comparison of the determinants of household recycling. Urban Ecosystems 3, 149-61.