Dealing with complexity: Theory of change evaluation and the full service extended schools initiative

International Journal of Research and Method in Education

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 119-134

  Dyson, Alan ^a   Todd, Liz ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Collaborative research; Complex and longitudinal data analysis; Evaluation; Theory of change

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953693705     PISSN: 1743727X     EISSN: 17437288     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1743727X.2010.484606     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Argyris, C., and D.A. Schon. 1978. Organizational learning. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
2. Argyris, C., and D.A. Schon. 1996. Organizational learning II: Theory, method and practice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3. Ashton, C.V. 2007. Using theory of change to enhance peace education evaluation. Conflict Resolution Quarterly 25, no. 1: 39-53.
4. Ball, M. 1998. School inclusion: The school, the family and the community. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
5. Ball, S.J. 2008. The education debate: Policy and politics in the twenty-first century. Bristol: The Policy Press.
6. Barnard, M.E., C. Becker, N. Creegan, K. Day, E. Devitt, L. Fuller, H. Lee, S. Neil, S. Purdon, and H. Ranns. 2009. Evaluation of the National Healthy Schools Programme: Interim report. London: National Centre for Social Research for the Department of Health.
7. Belsky, J., J. Barnes, and E. Melhuish, eds. 2007. The National Evaluation of Sure Start: Does area-based early intervention work? Bristol: The Policy Press.
8. Blair, T. 1999. Speech by the Prime Minister Tony Blair about Education Action Zones - 10 Downing Street, London, January 15. http://www.number-10.gov.uk/output/Page1172. asp.
9. Blank, M., A. Melaville, and B. Shah. 2003. Making the difference: Research and practice in community schools. Washington, DC: Coalition for Community Schools, Institute for Educational Leadership.
10. Brooke-Smith, R. 2003. Leading learners, leading schools. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
11. Chapman, C., and H. Gunter. 2009. A decade of New Labour reform of education. In Radical reforms: Perspectives on an era of educational change, ed. C. Chapman and H. Gunter, 1-13. London: Routledge.
12. Clark, H., and C. Grimaldi. 2005. Evaluation of Children's Aid Society Community Schools. In Community schools in action: Lessons from a decade of practice, ed. J.G. Dryfoos, J. Quinn, and C. Barkin, 166-86. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13. Connell, J., and A.M. Klem. 2000. You can get there from here: Using a theory of change approach to plan urban education reform. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consulting 11, no. 1: 93-120.
14. Connell, J.P., and A.C. Kubisch. 1998. Applying a theory of change approach to the evaluation of comprehensive community initiatives: Progress, prospects and problems. In New approaches to evaluating community initiatives, volume. 2: Theory, measurement and analysis, ed. K. Fulbright-Anderson, A.C. Kubisch, and J.P. Connell, 15-44. Queenstown: The Aspen Institute.
15. Coote, A., J. Allen, and D. Woodhead. 2004. Finding out what works: Building knowledge about complex community-based initiatives. London: The King's Fund.
16. Cummings, C., A. Dyson, D. Muijs, I. Papps, P. Pearson, C. Raffo, L. Tiplady, and L. Todd. 2007. Evaluation of the full service extended schools initiative: Final report (DfES Research Report 852). London: DfES.
17. Cummings, C., A. Dyson, I. Papps, P. Pearson, C. Raffo, L. Tiplady, and L. Todd. 2006. Evaluation of the full service extended schools initiative, second year: Thematic papers. London: DfES.
18. Cummings, C., A. Dyson, I. Papps, D. Pearson, C. Raffo, and L. Todd. 2005. Evaluation of the full service extended schools project: End of first year report. London: DfES.
19. Cummings, C., A. Dyson, and L. Todd. 2007. Towards extended schools? How education and other professionals understand community-oriented schooling. Children and Society 21: 189-200.
20. Davies, R.J. 2004. Scale, complexity and the representation of theories of change. Evaluation 10, no. 1: 101-21.
21. Davies, R.J. 2005. Scale, complexity and the representation of theories of change part II. Evaluation. Evaluation 11, no. 2: 133-49.
22. DCSF (Department for Children, Schools and Families). 2009. Deprivation and education: The evidence on pupils in England, Foundation Stage to Key Stage 4. London: DCSF.
23. DfEE (Department for Education and Employment). 1999. Schools Plus: Building learning communities. Improving the educational chances of children and young people from disad- vantaged areas (A report from the Schools Plus Policy Action Team 11). London: DfEE.
24. DfEE (Department for Education and Employment). 1999. Sure Start: Making a difference for children and families. London: DfEE.
25. DfES (Department for Education and Skills). 2003a. Every Child Matters. London: HMSO.
26. DfES (Department for Education and Skills). 2003b. Full service extended schools: Requirements and specifications. London: DfES.
27. DfES (Department for Education and Skills). 2005. Extended schools: Access to opportunities and services for all (A prospectus). London: DfES.
28. Dryfoos, J. 1994. Full-service schools: A revolution in health and social services for children, youth, and families. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
29. Dryfoos, J., and S. Maguire. 2002. Inside full-service community schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
30. Dyson, A. 2010. Community focused schools. In International Encyclopedia of Education, 3rd ed., ed. E. Baker, B. McGaw, and P. Peterson. New York: Elsevier.
31. Edwards, A., M. Barnes, I. Plewis, and K. Morris. 2006. Working to prevent the social exclusion of children and young people: Final lessons from the National Evaluation of the Children's Fund (Research Report RR734). London: DfES.
32. Geddes, M. 2006. National Evaluation of Local Strategic Partnerships: Theory of change issues paper. London: DCLG.
33. Gorard, S. 2005. Academies as the 'future of schooling': Is this an evidence-based policy? Journal of Education Policy 20, no. 3: 369-77.
34. Henderson, A.T., and K.L. Mapp. 2002. A new wave of evidence: The impact of school, family, and community connections on student achievement (Annual synthesis). Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
35. Humphrey, N., K. Kalambouka, J. Bolton, A. Lendrum, M. Wigelsworth, C. Lennie, and P. Farrell. 2008. Primary Social and Emotional Aspects of Learning (SEAL): Evaluation of small group work. London: DCSF.
36. Johnson, M. 2008. Ofsted social targets misunderstand schools. EducationGuardian.co.uk. April 30.
37. Keyes, M.C., and G. Gregg. 2001. School-community connections: A literature review. Charleston, WV: AEL.
38. Mackenzie, M., and A. Blamey. 2005. The practice and the theory: Lessons from the application of a theories of change approach. Evaluation 11, no. 2: 151-68.
39. Morrison, K. 2002. School leadership and complexity theory. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
40. National Audit Office. 2007. The academies programme. London: HMSO.
41. National Evaluation of Sure Start. n.d. National Evaluation of Sure Start - Methodology report executive summary. http://www.ness.bbk.ac.uk/documents/Methodology.pdf
42. National Strategy for Neighbourhood Renewal. 2000. Report of Policy Action Team 17: Joining it up locally. London: Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions.
43. NFER (National Foundation for Educational Research). 2007. National Evaluation of Excellence in Cities 2002-2006. London: DCSF.
44. Ozga, J. 2000. Policy research in educational settings: Contested terrain. Buckingham: Open University Press.
45. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. 2007. Academies evaluation: 4th annual report. London: DCSF.
46. Rees, G., S. Power, and C. Taylor. 2007. The governance of educational inequalities: The limits of area-based initiatives. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 9, no. 3: 261-74.
47. Sammons, P., S. Power, K. Elliot, P. Robertson, C. Campbell, and G. Whitty. 2003. New Community Schools in Scotland: Final report. National evaluation of the pilot phase. London: Institute of Education, University of London.
48. Spicer, N., and P. Smith. 2008. Evaluating complex, area-based initiatives in a context of change: The experience of the Children's Fund initiative. Evaluation 14: 75-90.
49. Stame, N. 2004. Theory-based evaluation and types of complexity. Evaluation 10, no. 1: 58-76.
50. Sullivan, H., M. Barnes, and E. Matka. 2002. Building collaborative capacity through theories of change: Early lessons from the evaluation of Health Action Zones in England. Evaluation 8, no. 1: 205-26.
51. Szirom, T., R. Jaffe, and D. MacKenzie (Strategic Partners in association with the Centre for Youth Affairs and Development). 2001. National evaluation report: Full service schools program 1999 and 2000. Canberra: Commonwealth Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.
52. Toynbee, P. 2005. Comment. We must hold our nerve and support deprived children. Sure Start remains one of the government's best achievements, but the new centres need more professional backup. http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2005/sep/13/earlyyearseducation. uk
53. Weiss, C.H. 1995. Nothing as practical as a good theory: Exploring theory-based evaluation for comprehensive community initiatives for children and families. In New approaches to evaluating community initiatives: Concepts, methods and contexts, ed. J. Connell, A.C. Kubisch, L.B. Schorr, and C.H. Weiss, 65-92. Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute.
54. Weitzman, B.C. 2002. Integrating a comparison group design into a theory of change evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation 23, no. 1: 371-85.
55. Whalen, S. 2002. Report of the evaluation of the Polk Bros: Foundation's full service schools initiative. Executive summary. Chicago, IL: Chapin Hall Center for Children at The University of Chicago for the Polk Bros Foundation.
56. Wilkin, A., K. Kinder, R. White, M. Atkinson, and P. Dohertry. 2003. Towards the development of extended schools (Research Report 408). London: NFER/DfES.
57. Wilkin, A., R. White, and K. Kinder. 2003. Towards extended schools: A literature review (Research Report 432). London: NFER/DfES.
58. W.K. Kellogg Foundation. 2004. Logic model development guide. Battle Creek, MI: W.K. Kellogg Foundation.
59. Wyse, D., E. McCreery, and H. Torrance. 2008. The trajectory and impact of national reform: Curriculum and assessment in English primary schools (Primary Review Research Survey 3/2). Cambridge: University of Cambridge, Faculty of Education.