Using theory of change to enhance peace education evaluation

Conflict Resolution Quarterly

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 39-53

  Ashton, Carolyne V ^a  

^a Educational and Training Curriculum Development and Evaluation

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 36348985484     PISSN: 15365581     EISSN: 15411508     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/crq.189     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Aleksanyan, L., and others. Life Skills Program. Yerevan: Armenian Ministry of Education and Science and UNICEF - Armenia, 2000.
2. Ashton, C., and others. Global Education Project: Evaluation Report for Second Phase. Tirana: UNICEF - Albania, 2000.
3. Ashton, C., and others. Evaluation Report: Life Skills Project Implementation in the Armenian Education System. Yerevan: UNICEF - Albania and Albanian Ministry of Education and Science, 2001.
4. Ashton, C. V. Evaluation Report: Programa Pendidikan Damai. Jakarta: UNICEF - Jakarta and Programa Pendidikan Damai - Aceh, 2002.
5. Chen, H.-T. Theory-Driven Evaluations. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage, 1990.
6. Church, C., and Rogers, M. M. Designing for Results: Integrating Monitoring and Evaluation in Conflict Transformation Programs. Washington, D.C: Search for Common Ground Alliance for Peacebuilding and U.S. Institute of Peace, 2006.
7. Close, S. Evaluation Report: Joint Project: Education for Peace Institute of the Balkans and Japan International Cooperation Agency: Executive Summary. Sarajevo: Japan International Cooperation Agency and Education for Peace, 2005.
8. Dautaj, A., and others. Global Education Project. Tirana: Albanian Ministry of Education and Science, UNICEF and International Institute for Global Education, 2000.
9. Davies, L. "Evaluating the Link Between Conflict and Education." Journal of Peacebuilding and Development, 2005, 2(2): 42-58.
10. Fountain, S. Peace Education in UNICEF. New York: UNICEF, Education Section, Programme Division, 1999.
11. Fountain, S. Evaluating UNICEF Peace Education Projects. New York: UNICEF, 2002.
12. Harris, R. A. Unlocking the Learning Potential in Peer Mediation: An Evaluation of Peer Mediator Modeling and Disputant Learning. Fairfax, Va.: Institute for Conflict Analysis and Resolution, George Mason University, 2002.
13. Hord, S. M. "Professional Learning Communities: Communities of Continuous Inquiry and Improvement." Southwest Educational Development Laboratory, 1997. Retrieved March 1, 2003, from http://www.sedl.org/pubs/ change34/welcome.html.
14. Husin, A., and others. Peace Education Curriculum. Jakarta: UNICEF, Nonviolence International, and AusAID, 2002.
15. Lantieri, L., and Patti, J. Waging Peace in Our Schools. Boston: Beacon Press, 1996.
16. Lederach, J. P. Building Peace: Sustainable Reconciliation in Divided Societies. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Institute of Peace, 1997.
17. Lipsey, M. W., and Pollard, J. A. "Driving Toward Theory in Program Evaluation: More Models to Choose From." Evaluation and Program Planning, 1989, 12, 317-328.
18. Rattride-Stirling, J. "Thematic Networks: An Analytic Tool for Qualitative Research." Qualitative Research, 2001, 1(3), 385-405.
19. Reardon, B. A., and Cabezudo, A. Rationale for and Approaches to Peace Education, Book 1. New York: Hague Appeal for Peace, 2002.
20. Riggin, L.J.C. "Linking Program Theory and Social Science Theory." In L. Bickman (ed.), Advances in Program Theory. New Directions for Program Evaluation, no. 47. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1990.
21. Ross, M. H. "'Good-Enough' Isn't So Bad: Thinking About Success and Failure in Ethnic Conflict Management." Unpublished manuscript, 1995.
22. Ross, M. H. "Action Evaluation in the Theory and Practice of Conflict Resolution." Peace and Conflict Studies, 2001, 8(1), 27-47.
23. Shadish, W. R., Jr. "Theory-Driven Metaevaluation." In H.-T. Chen and P. H. Rossi (eds.), Using Theory to Improve Program and Policy Evaluations. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1992.
24. Shapiro, I. L. Mapping Theories of Practice and Change: A Comparative Analysis of Intervention Programs Addressing Racial and Ethnic Tensions in U.S. Communities. Fairfax, Va.: Institute for Conflict Analysis and Resolution, George Mason University, 2002.
25. Stame, N. "Theory-Based Evaluation and Types of Complexity." Evaluation, 2004, 10(1), 58-76.
26. Strauss, A., and Corbin, J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage, 1990.
27. Weiss, C. H. Evaluation Research: Methods of Assessing Program Effectiveness. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1972.