Measuring structural change and energy use: Decomposition of the US economy from 1997 to 2002

Energy Policy

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 1561-1570

  Weber, Christopher L ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Index decomposition analysis; Structural change; Structural decomposition analysis

Indexed keywords

ECONOMICS; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENERGY MANAGEMENT; PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

DECOMPOSITION ANALYSIS; DRIVING FORCES; ECONOMIC OUTPUTS; ECONOMIC STRUCTURES; ENERGY DEMANDS; ENERGY PRODUCTIONS; ENERGY USAGES; ENERGY USE; INDEX DECOMPOSITION ANALYSIS; INPUT-OUTPUT ANALYSIS; SENSITIVE PARAMETERS; STRUCTURAL CHANGE; STRUCTURAL DECOMPOSITION ANALYSIS; TOTAL ENERGIES; TRADE DEFICITS; US ECONOMIES;

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

DECOMPOSITION ANALYSIS; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENERGY FLOW; ENERGY USE; HOUSEHOLD ENERGY; INPUT-OUTPUT ANALYSIS; NATIONAL ECONOMY; PARAMETERIZATION; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; POPULATION GROWTH; STRUCTURAL CHANGE;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 63149182592     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.027     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Ang B.W. Decomposition analysis for policymaking in energy: which is the preferred method?. Energy Policy 32 (2004) 1131-1139
2. Ang B.W., and Liu F.L. A new energy decomposition method: perfect in decomposition and consistent in aggregation. Energy 26 (2001) 537-548
3. Ang B.W., and Zhang F.Q. A survey of index decomposition analysis in energy and environmental studies. Energy 25 (2000) 1149-1176
4. BEA, 2005. GDP by Indusry Accounts: Gross Ouput by Industry in Current Dollars and Price Indexes by industry. Bureau of Economic Analysis.
5. BEA, 2008. US Trade in Goods and Services. US Bureau of Economic Analysis, Washington, D.C., from 〈http://bea.gov/international/index.htm#trade〉.
6. Census, 2007. Current Population Survey of the United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics, US Census, Washington D.C., 2007, from 〈http://www.bls.census.gov/cps_ftp.html〉.
7. Davis, S.C., Diegel, S.W., 2007. Transportation Energy Data Book. Edition 26. Oak Ridge, Oak Ridge National Laboratory ORNL-6978.
8. Dietzenbacher E., and Los B. Structural decomposition techniques: sense and sensitivity. Economic Systems Research 10 (1998) 307-323
9. Dietzenbacher E., and Stage J. Mixing oil and water? Using hybrid input-output tables in a structural decomposition analysis. Economic Systems Research 18 (2006) 85-95
10. EIA. Annual Energy Review 1997 (1998), Energy Information Administration, Washington, D.C.
11. EIA, 2000. Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey 1998. Energy Information Administration Retrieved 6/10/08, Washington, D.C., from 〈http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/mecs/〉.
12. EIA. Annual Energy Review 2002 (2003), Energy Information Administration, Washington, D.C
13. EIA, 2004. Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey 2002. Energy Information Administration Retrieved 6/10/08, Washington, D.C., from 〈http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/mecs/〉.
14. EIA, 2008. Online Energy Price Databases for Electricity, Coal, Gas, and Petroleum Prices. EIA, Washington, D.C., from 〈http://www.eia.doe.gov/prices〉.
15. Hoekstra R., and van der Bergh J.C.J.M. Structural decomposition analysis of physical flows in the economy. Environmental and Resource Economics 23 (2002) 357-378
16. Hoekstra R., and van der Bergh J.J.C.J.M. Comparing structural and index decomposition analysis. Energy Economics 25 (2003) 39-64
17. IEA. Energy Balances of OECD Countries (2008), International Energy Agency, Paris
18. Lawson, A.M., Bersani, K.S., Fahim-Nader, M., Guo, J., 2002. Benchmark Input-Output Accounts of the United States, 1997 (No. 19-109): US Bureau of Economic Analysis.
19. Lenzen M. Errors in conventional and input-output-based life-cycle inventories. Journal of Industrial Ecology 4 (2000) 127-148
20. Leontief W. Environmental repercussions and the economic structure: an input-output approach. The Review of Economics and Statistics 52 (1970) 262-271
21. Leontief W. Input-Output Economics. second ed. (1986), Oxford University Press, New York
22. Liu N., and Ang B.W. Factors shaping aggregate energy intensity trend for industry: energy intensity versus product mix. Energy Economics 29 (2007) 609-635
23. Metcalf G.E. An empirical analysis of energy intensity and its determinants at the state level. The Energy Journal 29 (2008) 1-26
24. Miller R.E., and Blair P.D. Input-Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions (1985), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey
25. Murtishaw S., and Schipper L. Disaggregated analysis of US energy consumption in the 1990s: evidence of the rapid effects of the internet and rapid economic growth. Energy Policy 29 (2001) 1335-1356
26. OEERE, 2008. Energy Intensity Indicators. US Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Retrieved 7/15/08, 2008, Washington, D.C., from 〈http://www1.eere.energy.gov/ba/pba/intensityindicators/〉.
27. Peters, G., Hertwich, E., (2005, June 20-22, 2005). Energy and Pollution Embodied in Trade: The Case of Norway. Paper presented at the ECOS 2005, Trondheim, Norway.
28. 2 emissions-a race between increasing consumption and efficiency gains. Environmental Science & Technology 41 (2007) 5939-5944
29. Pizer W. The case for intensity targets (2005), Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C.
30. Rormose, P., Olsen, T., 2005. Structural Decomposition Analysis of Air Emissions in Denmark 1980-2002, 15th International Input-Output Conference. IIOA, Beijing.
31. Rose A., and Casler S. Input-output structural decomposition analysis: a critical appraisal. Economic Systems Research 8 (1996) 33-62
32. Schipper L., Ting M.K., Khruschch M., and Golove W. The evolution of carbon dioxide emissions from energy use in industrialied countries: an end-use analysis. Energy Policy 25 7-9 (1997) 651-672
33. Sharrard A. Greening Construction Processes with an Input-Output-Based Hybrid Life Cycle Assessment Model (2007), Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
34. Stewart R.L., Stone B.S., and Streitwieser M.L. US Benchmark Input-Output Accounts, 2002 (2007), US Bureau of Economic Analysis, Washington, D.C.
35. UN Department for Economic and Social Affairs, 1999. Studies in Methods: Handbook of Input-Output Table Compilation and Analysis. United Nations, New York.
36. United Nations, 1999. Handbook of Input-Output Table Compilation and Analysis. Studies in Methods Series F, No 74. Handbook of National Accounting. United Nations, New York.
37. US Department of Commerce, 2000. 1997 Economic Census. Economics and Statistics Administration, US Census Bureau, from 〈http://www.census.gov/epcd/www/econ97.html〉.
38. US Department of Commerce, 2005. 2002 Economic Census. Economics and Statistics Administration, US Census Bureau, from 〈http://www.census.gov/econ/census02/〉.
39. USDA, 1999. 1997 Census of Agriculture. US Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., from 〈http://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/1997/index.asp〉.
40. USDA, 2004. 2002 Census of Agriculture. Washington, D.C.: US Department of Agriculture, from 〈http://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2002/index.asp〉.
41. USDA, 2005. National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS). US Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., from 〈http://www.nass.usda.gov/index.asp〉.
42. Weber C., and Matthews H.S. Embodied environmental emissions in US international trade. Environmental Science & Technology 41 (2007) 4875-4881
43. Weber, C.L., 2008. Uncertainties in Constructing Environmental Multiregional Input-Output Models, International Input-Output Meeting on Managing the Environment. International Input-Output Association, Seville, Spain, pp. 1-31.
44. Wiedmann T., Lenzen M., Turner K., and Barrett J. Examining the global environmental impact of regional consumption activities-part 2: review of input-output models for the assessment of environmental impacts embodied in trade. Ecological Economics 61 (2007) 15-26
45. Yamano, N., Ahmad, N., 2006. The OECD Input-Output Database: 2006 Edition (No. 2006/8). Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris.