Factorial design of experiment (DOE) for parametric exergetic investigation of a steam methane reforming process for hydrogen production

Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification

Volumn 49, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 500-507

  Hajjaji, Noureddine ^a,b   Renaudin, Viviane ^a   Houas, Ammar ^b   Pons, Marie Noëlle ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE LORRAINE   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GABES   (Tunisia)

Author keywords

Exergy; Factorial design; Hydrogen; Steam methane reforming

Indexed keywords

DESTROYED EXERGY; EFFICIENT PRODUCTION; ENERGY SYSTEMS; EXERGETIC EFFICIENCY; EXERGETIC PERFORMANCE; EXERGY ANALYSIS; FACTORIAL DESIGN; MINIMUM COST; OPERATING PARAMETERS; OPERATING TEMPERATURE; PARAMETRIC STUDY; PRIMARY ENERGY CONSUMPTION; PROCESS ENERGY; SECOND-ORDER POLYNOMIAL; STEAM METHANE REFORMING; STEAM-TO-CARBON RATIO; WHOLE PROCESS;

DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS; EXERGY; GAS PRODUCERS; HEAT ENGINES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; METHANE; REFORMING REACTIONS; STEAM; STRATEGIC PLANNING; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

HYDROGEN PRODUCTION;

EID: 77953692070     PISSN: 02552701     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cep.2010.03.017     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Schultz M.G., Diehl T., Brasseur G.P., Zittel W. Air pollution and climate forcing impacts of a global hydrogen economy. Science 2003, 302:624-627.
2. Bak Y.C. Status for the technology of hydrogen production from coals. Energy R&D 1993, 15:191-201.
3. Dixon R.K. Advancing towards a hydrogen energy economy: status, opportunities and barriers. Mitigation Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Change 2007, 12:325-341.
4. Mueller-Langer F., Tzimas E., Kaltschmitt M., Peteves S. Techno-economic assessment of hydrogen production processes for the hydrogen economy for the short and medium term. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2007, 32:3797-3810.
5. Haüssinger P., Lohmüller R., Watson A.M. Hydrogen. Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry 2003, vol. 17. Wiley-VHC, Weinheim, pp. 108-123. 6th edn.
6. Fu C.H., Wu J.C.S. Mathematical simulation of hydrogen production via methanol steam reforming using double jacketed membrane reactor. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2007, 32:4830-4839.
7. Adhikari S., Fernand S., Gwaltney S.R., To S.D.F., Bricka R.M., Steele P.H., Haryanto A. A thermodynamic analysis of hydrogen production by steam reforming of glycerol. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2007, 32:2875-2880.
8. Tugnoli A., Landucci G., Cozzani V. Sustainability assessment of hydrogen production by steam reforming. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2008, 33:4345-4357.
9. Hoguet J.C., Karagiannakis G.P., Valla J.A., Agrafiotisa C.C., Konstandopoulos A.G. Gas and liquid phase fuels desulphurization for hydrogen production via reforming processes. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2009, 34:4953-4962.
10. Khothari R., Buddhi D., Sawhney R.L. Comparison of environmental and economic aspects of various hydrogen production methods. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 2008, 12:553-563.
11. Manish S., Banerjee R. Comparison of biohydrogen process. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2008, 33:279-286.
12. Barelli L., Bidini G., Gallorini F., Servili S. Hydrogen production through sorption-enhanced steam methane reforming and membrane technology: a review. Energy 2008, 33:554-570.
13. Dincer I., Al-Muslim H. Thermodynamic analysis of reheat cycle steam power plant. Int. J. Energy Res. 2001, 25:727-739.
14. Araújo A.B., Brito R.P., Vasconcelos L.S. Exergetic analysis of distillation processes-a case study. Energy 2007, 32:1185-1193.
15. Kwak H.Y., Kim D.J., Jeon J.S. Exergetic thermoeconomic analyses of power plants. Energy 2003, 28:343-360.
16. Kwak H.Y., Lee H.S., Jung J.Y., Jeon J.S., Park D.R. Exergetic and thermoeconomic analysis of a 200-kW phosphoric acid fuel cell plant. Fuel 2004, 83:2087-2094.
17. Simpson A.P., Lutz A.E. Exergy analysis of hydrogen production via stream methane reforming. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2007, 32:4811-4820.
18. Rosen M.A. Thermodynamic investigation of hydrogen production by steam-methane reformation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 1991, 16:207-217.
19. Lambert J., Sorin M., Paris J. Analysis of oxygen-enriched combustion for steam methane reforming SMR. Energy 1997, 22:817-825.
20. Lutz A., Bradshaw R., Keller J., Witmer D. Thermodynamic analysis of hydrogen production by steam reforming. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2003, 28:159-167.
21. Bargigli S., Raugei M., Ulgiati S. Comparison of thermodynamic and environmental indexes of natural gas, syngas and hydrogen production processes. Energy 2004, 29:2145-2159.
22. Vicente G., Martínez M., Aracil J. Optimisation of integrated biodiesel production. Part I. A study of the biodiesel purity and yield. Bioresour. Technol. 2007, 98:1724-1733.
23. Vicente G., Martínez M., Aracil J. Application of the factorial design of experiments and response surface methodology to optimize biodiesel production. Ind. Crops Prod. 1998, 8:29-35.
24. Rafiqul I., Lugang B., Yan Y., Li T. Study on co-liquefaction of coal and bagasse by factorial experiment design method. Fuel Process. Technol. 2000, 68:3-12.
25. Berrios M., Gutiérrez M.C., Martín M.A., Martín A. Application of the factorial design of experiments to biodiesel production from lard. Fuel Process. Technol. 2009, 90:1447-1451.
26. 2 factorial design and the desirability function. J. Power Sources 2007, 169:131-139.
27. Sathiyamoorthy P., Shanmugasundaram S. Experimental design for optimization of cyanobacterial biomass production in a low-cost bioreactor. Bioresour. Technol. 1995, 53:225-229.
28. Calemma V., Correra S., Perego C., Pollesel P., Pellegrini L. Hydroconversion of Fischer-Tropsch waxes: assessment the operating conditions effect by factorial design experiments. Catal. Today 2005, 106:282-287.
29. Voss C. Applications of pressure swing adsorption technology. Adsorption 2005, 11:527-529.
30. Warmuzinski K., Tanczyk M. Multicomponent pressure swing adsorption. Part I. Modeling of a large scale PSA installation. Chem. Eng. Process. 1997, 36:89-99.
31. Adhikari S., Fernando S. Hydrogen membrane separation techniques. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2006, 45:875-881.
32. Aspen plus™, Physical Property Methods and Models. Software Version, Aspen Technology Inc., Burlington, MA, USA, 1988.
33. Seo.Y.S., Shirley A., Kolaczkowski S.T. Evaluation of thermodynamically favourable operating condition for production of hydrogen in three different reforming technologies. J. Power Sources 2002, 108:213-225.
34. 2 sorbent for hydrogen production from methane. Energy Procedia 2009, 1:749-755.
35. Vagia E.C., Lemonidou A.A. Thermodynamic analysis of hydrogen production via steam reforming of selected components of aqueous bio-oil fraction. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2007, 32:212-223.
36. Jannelli E., Minutillo M. Simulation of the flue gas cleaning system of an RDF incineration power plant. Waste Manage. 2007, 27:684-690.
37. Salemme L., Menna L., Simeone M. Analysis of the energy efficiency of innovative ATR-based PEM fuel cell system with hydrogen membrane separation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2009, 34:6384-6392.
38. Kotas T.J. The Exergy Method of Thermal Plant Analysis 1995, Krieger Publishing Company, Malabar, FL, USA. 2nd edn.
39. Hinderink A.P., Kerkhof F., Lie A., Arons J.S., Kooi H.J. Exergy analysis with a flowsheeting simulator. I. Theory: calculating exergies of material streams. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1996, 51:4693-4700.
40. Szargut J., Morris D.R., Steward F.R. Exergy Analysis of a Thermal, Chemical and Metallurgical Processes 1988, Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, New York.
41. Brzustowski T.A. Toward a second-law taxonomy of combustion processes. Energy 1980, 5:743-756.
42. Dunbar W.R., Lior N. Sources of combustion irreversibility. Comb. Sci. Technol. 1994, 103:41-61.
43. Kousuke N., Toshimi T., Shinichi K. Analysis of entropy generation and exergy loss during combustion. Proc. Combustion Inst. 2002, 29:869-874.
44. Venugopala R., Sathiyamoorthy D. Investigation through factorial design on novel method of preparing vanadium carbide using carbon during aluminothermic reduction. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2006, 176:133-139.
45. Kafarov V. Cybernetic Methods and Chemical Technology 1974, Mir edn, Moscow, Russia.