Seeing and feeling volumes: The influence of shape on volume perception

Acta Psychologica

Volumn 134, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 385-390

  Kahrimanovic, Mirela ^a   Bergmann Tiest, Wouter M ^a   Kappers, Astrid M L ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Multimodal; Psychophysics; Touch; Vision

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHYSIOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE; TOUCH; VISION;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MALE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SIZE PERCEPTION; TOUCH; VISION, OCULAR;

EID: 77953686975     PISSN: 00016918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.03.011     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Coren S. The left-hander syndrome 1993, Vintage Books, New York.
2. Ellis R.R., Lederman S.J. The role of haptic versus visual volume cues in the size-weight illusion. Perception & Psychophysics 1993, 53(3):315-324.
3. Frayman B.J., Dawson W.E. The effect of object shape and mode of presentation on judgements of apparent volume. Perception & Psychophysics 1981, 29(1):56-62.
4. Holmberg L. The influence of elongation on the perception of volume of geometrically simple objects. Psychological Research Bulletin 1975, 15(2):1-18.
5. Kahrimanovic M., Bergmann Tiest W.M., Kappers A.M.L. Haptic perception of volume and surface area of 3-D objects. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics 2010, 72(2):517-527.
6. Krishna A. Interaction of senses: the effect of vision versus touch on the elongation bias. Journal of Consumer Research 2006, 32(4):557-566.
7. Lauer L. Investigations concerning the apparent size of objects. Untersuchungen über die scheinbare Grösse von Körpern 1929, 68:295-324.
8. Lederman S.J., Klatzky R.L. Hand movements: a window into haptic object recognition. Cognitive Psychology 1987, 19(3):342-368.
9. Piaget J. Quantification, conservation, and nativism. Science 1968, 162(3857):976-979.
10. Pick H.L., Pick A.D. A developmental and analytic study of the size-weight illusion. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 1967, 5(3):362-371.
11. Raghubir P., Krishna A. Vital dimensions in volume perception: can the eye fool the stomach?. Journal of Marketing Research 1999, 36(3):313-326.
12. Stanek R.J. Surface and volume judgements of three-dimensional shapes. Psychonomic Science 1968, 11:121-122.
13. Stanek R.J. A parametric study of volume and surface judgments. Perception & Psychophysics 1969, 6:16-18.
14. TNO test for stereoscopic vision. (1972). Utrecht, The Netherlands: Laméris Instrumenten BV.
15. Van Veen H.A.H.C., Kappers A.M.L., Koenderink J.J., Werkhoven P. Discriminating the volume of motion-defined solids. Perception & Psychophysics 1996, 58(4):561-570.
16. Wansink B., Van Ittersum K. Bottoms up! The influence of elongation on pouring and consumption volume. Journal of Consumer Research 2003, 30(3):455-463.
17. Wichmann F.A., Hill N.J. The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit. Perception & Psychophysics 2001, 63(8):1293-1313.