Haptic perception of volume and surface area of 3-D objects

Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

Volumn 72, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 517-527

  Kahrimanovic, Mirela ^a   Bergmann Tiest, Wouter M ^a   Kappers, Astrid M L ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONCEPT FORMATION; DECISION MAKING; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; ILLUSION; LEARNING; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOMETRY; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICS; TOUCH;

ASSOCIATION LEARNING; CONCEPT FORMATION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; JUDGMENT; MALE; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOMETRICS; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SIZE PERCEPTION; STEREOGNOSIS; TOUCH; WEIGHT PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77951894996     PISSN: 19433921     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/APP.72.2.517     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Amazeen, E.L. (1999). Perceptual independence of size and weight by dynamic touch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 102-119.
2. Anastasi, A. (1936). The estimation of area. Journal of General Psychology, 14, 201-225.
3. Anderson, N.H., & Cuneo, D.O. (1978). The height + width rule in children's judgments of quantity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 107, 335-378.
4. Coren, S. (1993). The left-hander syndrome. New York: Vintage.
5. Fisher, G.H., & Foster, J.J. (1968). Apparent sizes of different shapes and the facility with which they can be identified. Nature, 219, 653-654.
6. Frayman, B.J., & Dawson, W.E. (1981). The effect of object shape and mode of presentation on judgments of apparent volume. Perception & Psychophysics, 29, 56-62.
7. Holmberg, L. (1975). The influence of elongation on the perception of volume of geometrically simple objects. Psychological Research Bulletin, 15, 1-18.
8. Jones, L.A. (1986). Perception of force and weight: Theory and research. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 29-42.
9. Klatzky, R.L., & Lederman, S.J. (2002). Touch. In I.B. Weiner (Editor in Chief) & A.F. Healy & R.W. Proctor (Vol. Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Vol. 4. Experimental psychology (pp. 147-176). New York: Wiley.
10. Krishna, A. (2006). Interaction of senses: The effect of vision versus touch on the elongation bias. Journal of Consumer Research, 32, 557-566.
11. Lauer, L. (1929). Investigations concerning the apparent size of objects. Untersuchungen über die scheinbare Grösse von Körpern, 68, 295-324.
12. Lederman, S.J., & Klatzky, R.L. (1987). Hand movements: A window into haptic object recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 342-368.
13. Piaget, J. (1968). Quantification, conservation, and nativism. Science, 162, 976-979.
14. Raghubir, P., & Krishna, A. (1999). Vital dimensions in volume perception: Can the eye fool the stomach? Journal of Marketing Research, 36, 313-326.
15. Stanek, R.J. (1968). Surface and volume judgments of three-dimensional shapes. Psychonomic Science, 11, 121-122.
16. Stanek, R.J. (1969). A parametric study of volume and surface judgments. Perception & Psychophysics, 6, 16-18.
17. Wansink, B., & Van Ittersum, K. (2003). Bottoms up! The influence of elongation on pouring and consumption volume. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 455-463.
18. Warren, J.M., & Pinneau, S.R. (1955). Influences of form on judgment of apparent area. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 5, 7-10.
19. Wichmann, F.A., & Hill, N.J. (2001). The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 1293-1313.