Practice-induced and sequential modulations of the simon effect

Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

Volumn 72, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 895-911

  Soetens, Eric ^a   Maetens, Kathleen ^a   Zeischka, Peter ^a  

^a FREE UNIVERSITY OF BRUSSELS   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COLOR VISION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECISION MAKING; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; LEARNING; METHODOLOGY; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; RECALL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COLOR PERCEPTION; FORM PERCEPTION; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MENTAL RECALL; ORIENTATION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PRACTICE (PSYCHOLOGY); PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 77953686602     PISSN: 19433921     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/APP.72.4.895     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Barber, P., & O'Leary, M. (1997). The relevance of salience: Towards an activation account of irrelevant stimulus-response compatibility effects. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.), Theoretical issues in stimulus- response compatibility (pp. 135-172). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
2. Berry, C. J., Shanks, D. R., & Henson, R. N. A. (2008). A singlesystem account of the relationship between priming, recognition, and fluency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 34, 97-111.
3. Colzato, L. S., Raffone, A., & Hommel, B. (2006). What do we learn from binding features? Evidence for multilevel feature integration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 32, 705-716.
4. Hommel, B. (1993). The relationship between stimulus processing and response selection in the Simon task: Evidence for a temporal overlap. Psychological Research, 55, 280-290.
5. Hommel, B., & Prinz, W. (ED S.) (1997). Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
6. Hommel, B., Proctor, R., & Vu, K.-P. L. (2004). A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychological Research, 68, 1-17.
7. Iani, C., Rubichi, S., Gherri, E., & Nicoletti, R. (2009). Cooccurrence of sequential and practice effects in the Simon task: Evidence for two independent mechanisms affecting response selection. Memory & Cognition, 37, 358-367.
8. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility-A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253-270.
9. Kornblum, S., & Stevens, G. (2002). Sequential effect of dimensional overlap: Findings and issues. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and performance XIX (pp. 9-54). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Leuthold, H., & Schröter, H. (2006). Electrophysiological evidence for response priming and conflict regulation in the auditory Simon task. Brain Research, 1097, 167-180.
11. Logan, G. D. (1980). Attention and automaticity in Stroop and priming tasks: Theory and data. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 523-553.
12. Logan, G. D., & Zbrodoff, N. J. (1979). When it helps to be misled: Facilitative effects of increasing the frequency of conflicting stimuli in a Stroop-like task. Memory & Cognition, 7, 166-174.
13. Marble, J. G., & Proctor, R. W. (2000). Mixing location-relevant and location-irrelevant choice-reaction tasks: Influences of location mapping on the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 1515-1533.
14. Mordkoff, J. T. (1998). The gating of irrelevant information in selective-attention tasks. Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society, 3, 21.
15. Notebaert, W., & Soetens, E. (2003). An auditory attention shift primes a corresponding response. Psychological Research, 67, 253-260.
16. Notebaert, W., Soetens, E., & Melis, A. (2001). Sequential analysis of a Simon task-Evidence for an attention-shift account. Psychological Research, 65, 170-184.
17. Proctor, R. W., & Lu, C.-H. (1999). Processing irrelevant location information: Practice and transfer effects in choice-reaction tasks. Memory & Cognition, 27, 63-77.
18. Proctor, R. W., Marble, J. G., & Vu, K.-P. L. (2000). Mixing incompatibly mapped location-relevant trials with location-irrelevant trials: Effects of stimulus mode on the reverse Simon effect. Psychological Research, 64, 11-24.
19. Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K.-P. L. (2002). Eliminating, magnifying, and reversing spatial compatibility effects with mixed location-relevant trials. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and performance XIX (pp. 443-473). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20. Proctor, R. W., Vu, K.-P. L., & Marble, J. G. (2003). Mixing locationrelevant and irrelevant tasks: Spatial compatibility effects eliminated by stimuli that share the same spatial codes. Visual Cognition, 10, 15-50.
21. Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002a). E-Prime reference guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools.
22. Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002b). E-Prime user's guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools.
23. Simon, J. R. (1990). The effects of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrative perspective (pp. 3186). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
24. Simon, J. R., & Rudell, A. P. (1967). Auditory S-R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 300-304.
25. Soetens, E., Boer, L. C., & Hueting, J. E. (1985). Expectancy or automatic facilitation? Separating sequential effects in two-choice reac-tion time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 11, 598-616.
26. Soetens, E., Casaer, S., D'Hooge, R., & Hueting, J. (1995). Effect of amphetamine on long-term retention of verbal material. Psychopharmacology, 119, 155-162.
27. Stoet, G., & Hommel, B. (1999). Action planning and the temporal binding of response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 1625-1640.
28. Stoffels, E. J., Van der Molen, M. W., & Keuss, P. G. J. (1989). An additive factor analysis of the effect(s) of location cues associated with auditory stimuli on stages of information processing. Acta Psychologica, 70, 161-197.
29. Stoffer, T. H., & Yakin, A. R. (1994). The functional role of attention for spatial coding in the Simon effect. Psychological Research, 56, 151-162.
30. Stürmer, B., Leuthold, H., Soetens, E., Schröter, H., & Sommer, W. (2002). Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 1345-1363.
31. Tagliabue, M., Zorzi, M., & Umiltà, C. (2002). Cross-modal remapping influences the Simon effect. Memory & Cognition, 30, 18-23.
32. Tagliabue, M., Zorzi, M., Umiltà, C., & Bassignani, F. (2000). The role of long-term memory and short-term-memory links in the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 648-670.
33. Ullsperger, M., Bylsma, L. M., & Botvinick, M. M. (2005). The conflict adaptation effect: It's not just priming. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 5, 467-472.
34. Valle-Inclán, F., Hackley, S. A., & de Labra, C. (2002). Does stimulus-driven response activation underlie the Simon effect? In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and performance XIX (pp. 474-493). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35. Van Duren, L. L., & Sanders, A. F. (1988). On the robustness of the additive factors stage structure in blocked and mixed choice reaction designs. Acta Psychologica, 69, 83-94.
36. Vu, K.-P. L. (2007). Influences on the Simon effect of prior practice with spatially incompatible mappings: Transfer within and between horizontal and vertical dimensions. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1463-1471.
37. Vu, K.-P. L., & Proctor, R. W. (2008). Age differences in response selection for pure and mixed stimulus-response mappings and tasks. Acta Psychologica, 129, 49-60.
38. Vu, K.-P. L., Proctor, R. W., & Urcuioli, P. (2003). Transfer effects of incompatible location-relevant mappings on a subsequent visual or auditory Simon task. Memory & Cognition, 31, 1146-1152.
39. Wühr, P., & Ansorge, U. (2005). Exploring trial-by-trial modulations of the Simon effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 705-731.
40. Zorzi, M., & Umiltà, C. (1995). A computational model of the Simon effect. Psychological Research, 58, 193-205.