Measurement uncertainty estimation of a robust photometer circuit

Sensors (Switzerland)

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 3149-3160

  Hernandez, Wilmar ^a   de Vicente, Jesús ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Closed loop transfer function; Input quantity; Photometer circuit; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

PHASE SHIFT; PHASE SHIFTERS; PHOTODIODES; PHOTOMETERS; PHOTOMETRY; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

CLOSED LOOP TRANSFER FUNCTION; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; ELECTRICAL PARTS; ELECTRONIC COMPONENT; INPUT QUANTITY; MEASUREMENT SYSTEM; MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY; UNCERTAINTY;

TRANSFER FUNCTIONS;

EID: 77953659942     PISSN: 14248220     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/s90403149     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Adams, T.M. G104-A2LA Guide for estimation of measurement uncertainty in testing; American Association for Laboratory Accreditation: Frederick, MD, USA, July 2002.
2. Hernandez, W. Photometer circuit based on positive and negative feedback compensations. Sens. Lett. 2007, 5, 612-614.
3. Hernandez, W. Linear robust photometer circuit. Sens. Actuator A 2008, 141, 447-453.
4. Hernandez, W. Performance analysis of a robust photometer circuit. IEEE Trans. Circuit. Syst. II 2008, 55, 106-110.
5. Hernandez, W. Robustness and noise voltage analysis in two photometer circuits. IEEE Sens. J. 2007, 7, 1668-1674.
6. Hernandez, W. Input-output transfer function analysis of a photometer circuit based on an operational amplifier. Sensors 2008, 8, 35-50.
7. Skogestad, S.; Posthlethwaite, I. Multivariable Feedback Control; John Wiley and Sons: Chichester, England, 1996.
8. Zhou, K.; Doyle, J.C.; Glover, K. Robust and Optimal Control; Prentice-Hall: New Jersey, USA, 1996.
9. Johnson, M. Photodetection and measurement: maximizing performance in optical systems; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 2003.
10. Pallás-Areny, P.; Webster, J.G. Sensors and signal conditioning, 2nd Ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 2001.
11. Graeme, J. Photodiode amplifiers: op amp solution; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1996.
12. Hernandez, W. Improving the response of an accelerometer by using optimal filtering. Sensor. Actuator. A-phys. 2001, 88, 198-208.
13. Hernandez, W. Improving the response of several accelerometers used in a car under performance tests by using Kalman filtering. Sensors 2001, 1, 38-52.
14. Hernandez, W. Improving the response of a wheel speed sensor using an adaptive line enhancer. Measurement 2003, 33, 229-240.
15. Hernandez, W. Improving the response of a wheel speed sensor by using frequency-domain adaptive filtering. IEEE Sens. J. 2003, 3, 404-413.
16. Hernandez, W. Robust multivariable estimation of the relevant information coming from a wheel speed sensor and an accelerometer embedded in a car under performance tests. Sensors 2005, 5, 488-508.
17. Hernandez, W. Improving the response of a rollover sensor placed in a car under performance tests by using a RLS lattice algorithm. Sensors 2005, 5, 613-632.
18. Hernandez, W. Improving the response of a wheel speed sensor by using a RLS lattice algorithm. Sensors 2006, 6, 64-79.
19. Hernandez, W. Improving the response of a load cell by using optimal filtering. Sensors 2006, 6, 697-711.
20. Hernandez, W. Wheel speed sensors. In Encyclopedia of Sensors; Grimes, C.A., Dickey, E.C., Pishko, M.V. Eds.; American Scientific Publishers: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2006; volume 10, pp. 461-472.
21. Hernandez, W. Optimal estimation of the acceleration of a car under performance tests. IEEE Sens. J. 2007, 7, 392-400.
22. Hernandez, W. Optimal estimation of the relevant information coming from a variable reluctance proximity sensor placed in a car undergoing performance tests. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2007, 21, 2732-2739.
23. Hernandez, W. A survey on optimal signal processing techniques applied to improve the performance of mechanical sensors in automotive applications. Sensors 2007, 7, 84-102.
24. International vocabulary of metrology - Basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM) European Co-operation for Acreditation of Laboratories. Published by BIPM in the name of BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP and OIML. Ref. JGCM 200:2008.
25. Evaluation of measurement data - Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. Published by BIPM in the name of BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP and OIML. Ref. JGCM 100:2008.
26. Cox, M.G.; Harris, P.M. Software support for metrology. Best practice guide No. 6: Uncertaitny evaluation; National Physical Laboratory, NPL Report, DEM-ES-011, Sep. 2006.
27. Evaluation of measurement data - Supplement 2 to the "Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement" - Models with any number of output quantities. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology, ISO/IEC Guide 98-3/NP Suppl. 2, to be published.
28. Ralston, A; Rabinowitz, P. A first course in numerical analysis; Courier Dover Publications: New York, NY, USA, 2001; Chapter 4.