A North American, Prospective, Multicenter Assessment of the Mitroflow Aortic Pericardial Prosthesis

Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Volumn 90, Issue 1, 2010, Pages

  Conte, John ^a   Weissman, Neil ^b   Dearani, Joseph A ^c   Bavaria, Joseph ^d   Heimansohn, David ^e   Dembitsky, Walter ^f   Doyle, Daniel ^g  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^d HOSPITAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^e Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery   (United States)

^f SHARP MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^g LAVAL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AORTA VALVE PROSTHESIS; AORTA VALVE REGURGITATION; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; BRAIN EMBOLISM; CLINICAL TRIAL; COHORT ANALYSIS; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; ENDOCARDITIS; ENDOLEAK; EXPLANT; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; MULTICENTER STUDY; NORTH AMERICA; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT; PRESSURE GRADIENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTHETIC VALVE DYSFUNCTION; PROSTHETIC VALVE ENDOCARDITIS; REOPERATION; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SURVIVAL; THROMBOEMBOLISM;

EID: 77953655844     PISSN: 00034975     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.02.108     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. van Geldorp M.W., Eric Jamieson W.R., Kappetein A.P., et al. Patient outcome after aortic valve replacement with a mechanical or biological prosthesis: weighing lifetime anticoagulant-related event risk against reoperation risk. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 137 (2009) 881-886
2. Desai N.D., and Christakis G.T. Bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement: stented pericardial and porcine valves. In: Cohn L.H. (Ed). Cardiac surgery in the adult (2008), McGraw-Hill, New York 857-894
3. Biglioli P., Spampinato N., Cannata A., et al. Long-term outcomes of the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve prosthesis in the aortic position: effect of patient age. J Heart Valve Dis 13 Suppl 1 (2004) 49-51
4. Yankah C.A., Schubel J., Buz S., Siniawski H., and Hetzer R. Seventeen-year clinical results of 1,037 Mitroflow pericardial heart valve prostheses in the aortic position. J Heart Valve Dis 14 (2005) 172-179
5. Yankah C.A., Pasic M., Musci M., et al. Aortic valve replacement with the Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis: durability results up to 21 years. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 136 (2008) 688-696
6. Gottdiener J.S., Bednarz J., Devereux R., et al. American Society of Echocardiography recommendations for use of echocardiography in clinical trials: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Task Force on Echocardiography in Clinical Trials. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 17 (2004) 1086-1119
7. Zoghbi W.A., Enriquez-Sarano M., Foster E., et al. Recommendations for evaluation of the severity of native valvular regurgitation with two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 16 (2003) 777-802
8. Lang R.L., Bierig M., Devereux R.B., et al. Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 18 (2005) 1440-1463
9. Durack D.T., Lukes A.S., and Bright D.K. New criteria for diagnosis of infective endocarditis: utilization of specific echocardiographic findings. Duke endocarditis service. Am J Med 96 (1994) 200-209
10. Edmunds L.H., Clark R.E., Cohn L.H., et al. Guidelines for reporting morbidity and mortality after cardiac valvular operations. Ann Thorac Surg 62 (1996) 932-935
11. Benhameid O., Jamieson W.R.E., Castellan M., et al. Carbomedics Mitroflow pericardial aortic bioprothesis-performance in patients aged 60 years and older after 15 years. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 56 (2008) 195-199
12. Mazzucotelli J.P., Bertrand P.C., and Loisance D.Y. The Mitroflow pericardial valve: clinical performance to 10 years. J Heart Valve Dis 4 (1995) 407-413
13. Pomar J.L., Jamieson W.R., Pelletier L.C., Castella M., Germann E., and Brownlee R.T. Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis experience in aortic valve replacement at ≥60 years of age. Ann Thorac Surg 66 Suppl (1998) 53-56
14. Sjögren J., Gudbjartsson T., and Thulin L.I. Long-term outcome of the Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis in the elderly after aortic valve replacement. J Heart Valve Dis 15 (2006) 197-202
15. Thulin L.I., Thilen U.J., and Kymle K.A. Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis in the aortic position. Low incidence of structural valve deterioration in elderly patients during an 11-year follow-up. Scand Cardiovasc J 34 (2000) 192-196
16. Frater R.W., Furlong P., Cosgrove D.M., et al. Long-term durability and patient functional status of the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis in the aortic position. J Heart Valve Dis 7 (1998) 48-53
17. Le Tourneau T., Savoye C., McFadden E.P., et al. Mid-term comparative follow-up after aortic valve replacement with Carpentier-Edwards and Pericarbon pericardial prostheses. Circulation 100 Suppl 2 (1999) 11-16
18. Poirer N.C., Pelletier L.C., Pellerin M., and Carrier M. 15-year experience with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg 66 Suppl (1998) 57-61
19. Gao G., Wu Y., Grunkemeier G.L., Furnary A.P., and Starr A. Durability of pericardial versus porcine aortic valves. J Am Coll Card 44 (2004) 384-388
20. Aupart M.R., Sirinelli A.L., Diemont F.F., Meurisse Y.A., Xavier B.D., and Marchand M.A. The last generation of pericardial valves in the aortic position: ten-year follow-up in 589 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 61 (1996) 615-620
21. Banbury M.K., Cosgrove D.M., White J.A., Blackstone E.H., Frater R.W., and Okies J.E. Age and valve size effect on the long-term durability of the Carpentier-Edwards aortic pericardial bioprosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg 72 (2001) 753-757
22. Smedira N.G., Blackstone E.H., Roselli E.E., Laffey C.C., and Cosgrove D.M. Are allografts the biologic valve of choice for aortic valve replacement in nonelderly patients?. Comparison of explantation for structural valve deterioration of allograft and pericardial prostheses. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 131 (2006) 558-564
23. Agnihotri A.K., McGiffin D.C., Galbraith A.J., and O'Brien M.F. The prevalence of infective endocarditis after aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 110 (1995) 1708-1720
24. Wang A., Athan E., Pappas P.A., et al. Contemporary clinical profile and outcome of prosthetic valve endocarditis. JAMA 297 (2007) 1354-1361
25. Bottio T., Rizzoli G., Thiene G., Nesseris G., Casarotto D., and Gerosa G. Hemodynamic and clinical outcomes with the Biocor valve in the aortic position: an 8-year experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 127 (2004) 1616-1623
26. Cosgrove D.M., Lytle B.W., Taylor P.C., et al. The Carpentier-Edwards pericardial aortic valve: ten-year results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 110 (1995) 651-662
27. Dellgren G., David T.E., Raanani E., Armstrong S., Ivanov J., and Rakowski H. Late hemodynamic and clinical outcomes of aortic valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis. J Thor Cardiovasc Surg 124 (2002) 146-154
28. Meyns B., Szecsi J., Flameng W., and Daenen W. Aortic and mitral valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: mid-term clinical results. J Heart Valve Dis 2 (1993) 66-70
29. Mistiaen W., Van Cauwelaert P.H., Sys S.U., Muylaertz P.H., Harrison F., and Bortier H. Role of age, gender and association of CABG on long-term results after aortic valve replacement with a Carpentier-Edwards bioprosthesis in the elderly. J Cardiovasc Surg 44 (2003) 701-706
30. McDonald M.L., Daly R.C., Schaff H.V., et al. Hemodynamic performance of small aortic valve bioprostheses: is there a difference?. Ann Thorac Surg 63 (1997) 362-366
31. Rajani R., Mukherjee D., and Chambers J.B. Doppler echocardiography in normally functioning replacement aortic valves: a review of 129 studies. J Heart Valve Dis 16 (2007) 519-535
32. Pelletier L.C., LeClerc Y., Bonan R., Crepeau J., and Dyrda I. Aortic valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: clinical and hemodynamic results. J Card Surg 3 (1988) 405-412