Towards socially sophisticated BDI agents

Proceedings - 4th International Conference on MultiAgent Systems, ICMAS 2000

Volumn , Issue , 2000, Pages 111-118

  Dignum, F ^a   Morley, D ^b   Sonenberg, E A ^b   Cavedon, L ^c  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^c RMIT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGENT ARCHITECTURES; AGENT REASONING; BDI AGENT; EXPLICIT REPRESENTATION; SOCIAL REASONING;

MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS;

EID: 84962115989     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICMAS.2000.858442     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Barbuceanu, M. Coordinating with Obligations. In Autonomous Agents 98, Minneapolis, 1998, ACM Press, pp 62-69.
2. Castelfranchi, C. Modeling Social Action for AI Agents Artificial Intelligence 103(1998)157-182.
3. C. Castelfranchi, F. Dignum, C. Jonker and J. Treur. Deliberate Normative Agents: Principles and Architectures, In N. Jennings and Y. Lesperance (eds.) Proceedings of ATAL-99, Orlando, 1999, pages 206-220.
4. L. Cavedon and L. Sonenberg On social commitments, roles and preferred goals, In Proceedings of the 1998 International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, ICMAS98, Paris, July 1998, (ed) Y Demazeau, pp 80-87.
5. F. Dignum. Information Management at a bank using agents: theory and practice, In Applied Artificial Intelligence, forthcoming.
6. F. Dignum and B. van Linder. Modelling social agents: Communication as actions. In M. Wooldridge J. Muller and N. Jennings, editors, Intelligent Agents III (LNAI-1193), pages 205-218. Springer-Verlag, 1997.
7. B. Grosz Collaborative Systems AI Magazine 17(1996)67-85.
8. B. Grosz and S. Kraus. Collaborative Plans for Complex Group Action, in Artificial Intelligence 86(1996)269-357.
9. L. Hogg and N. Jennings. Variable Socialability in Agent-based decision making, In N. Jennings and Y. Lesperance (eds.) Proceedings of ATAL-99, Orlando, 1999, pages 276-290.
10. N. Jennings. Commitments and Conventions: The foundation of coordination in Multi-Agent systems. Knowledge Engineering Review, vol. 8(3), pages 223-250, 1993.
11. Jennings. N.R. and Campos, J.R. Towards a Social Level Characterisation of Socially Responsible Agents. IEEE Proc. on Software Engineering, vol.144, 1, pp.11-25, 1997.
12. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/JASSS/JASSS.html.
13. Kinny M., Ljungberg, M, Rao, A, Sonenberg, E, Tidhar, G, and Werner, E. Planned Team Activity. In Artificial Social Systems, Springer LNCS 830, pages 227-256 (Eds) C Castelfranchi and E Werner, 1994
14. Rao, A.S., and Georgeff, M.P. BDI Agents: From Theory to Practice. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, ICMAS 95, San Francisco, 1995
15. Rosenschein, J., and Zlotkin, G. Rules of Encounter. MIT Press, Cambrige, USA, 1994.
16. Shoham, Y. and Tennenholtz, M. On social laws for artificial agent societies: off-line design. Artificial Intelligence 73(1995)231-252.
17. M. Singh Multiagent Systems as Spheres of Commitment. In International Conference on Multiagent Systems (ICMAS) Workshop on Norms, Obligations, and Conventions, Kyoto, Japan, December 1996.
18. Tambe, M. Agent architectures for flexible, practical teamwork. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-97), 1997.
19. Tidhar, G. and Sonenberg, E.A., Organized Distributed Systems. Submitted for publication, March 2000.
20. L. van der Torre and Y.-H. Tan. Contrary-To-Duty Reasoning with Preference-based Dyadic Obligations. In Annals of Mathematics and AI, submitted.