Factors influencing the spatial precision of electromagnetic tracking systems used for MEG/EEG source imaging;Facteurs influençant la précision spatiale des systèmes électromagnétiques utilisés en imagerie cérébrale MEG/EEG

Neurophysiologie Clinique

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 19-25

  Engels, L ^a   De Tiege, X ^b   Op de Beeck, M ^b   Warzee N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LIBRE DE BRUXELLES   (Belgium)

^b ERASME HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

EEG; Electrodes; Electromagnetic tracker system; Influencing factors; Localization; MEG; Polhemus; Precision

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTRODE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; HEAD MOVEMENT; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; NEURONAVIGATION; PHYSIOLOGY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTRODES; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; HEAD MOVEMENTS; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; NEURONAVIGATION; PHANTOMS, IMAGING;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 77953642920     PISSN: 09877053     EISSN: 17697131     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucli.2010.01.002     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Day, J., Dumas, G., Murdoch, D., Evaluation of a long-range transmitter for use with a magnetic tracking device in motion analysis. J Biomech 31 (1998), 957–961.
2. Day, J., Murdoch, D., Dumas, G., Calibration of position and angular data from a magnetic tracking device. J Biomech 33 (2000), 1039–1045.
3. De Munck, J., Vijn, P., Spekreijse, H., A practical method for determining electrode positions on the head. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 82 (1992), 160–163.
4. Hummel, J., Bax, M., Figl, M., Kang, Y., Maurer, C., Birkfellner, W., et al. Design and application of an assessment protocol for electromagnetic tracking systems. Phys Med Biol 32 (2005), 2371–2379.
5. Hummel, J., Figl, M., Birkfellner, W., Bax, M.R., Shahidi, R., Maurer, C.R., et al. Evaluation of a new electromagnetic tracking system using a standardized assessment protocol. Phys Med Biol 51 (2006), 205–210.
6. Jasper, H., The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 10 (1958), 371–375.
7. Khosla, D., Don, M., Kwong, B., Spatial mislocalization of EEG electrodes-effects on accuracy of dipole estimation. Clin Neurophysiol 110 (1999), 261–271.
8. Koessler, L., Maillard, L., Benhadid, A., Vignal, J.-P., Braun, M., Vespignani, H.S., Spatial localization of EEG electrodes. Neurophysiol Clin 37 (2007), 97–102.
9. Le, J., Lu, M., Pellouchoud, E., Gevins, A., A rapid method for determining standard 10/10 electrode positions for high-resolution EEG studies. Electroenchephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 106 (1998), 554–558.
10. Papadelis, C., Ioannides, A., Localization accuracy and temporal resolution of MEG: A phantom experiment. Int Congr Ser 1300 (2007), 257–260.
11. Périé, D., Tate, A., Cheng, P., Dumas, G., Evaluation and calibration of an electromagnetic tracking device for biomechanical analysis of lifting tasks. J Biomech 35 (2002), 293–297.
12. Schuler, N.B., Bey, M.J., Shearn, J.T., Butler, D.L., Evaluation of an electromagnetic position tracking for measuring in vivo, dynamic joint kinematics. J Biomech 38 (2004), 2113–2117.
13. Sijbers, K., Vanrumste, B., Van Hoey, G., Boon, P., Verhoye, M., Van der Linden, A., et al. Automatic localization of EEG electrode markers within MR data. Magn Reson Imaging 18 (2000), 485–488.