Mating behavior differences and the cost of mating in Allonemobius fasciatus and A. socius

Journal of Insect Behavior

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 268-289

  Birge, Leanna M ^a,e   Hughes, Andrea L ^b   Marshall, Jeremy L ^c   Howard, Daniel J ^d  

^a NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Carolina Wetlands Services Inc   (United States)

^c KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Allonemobius; Behavioral isolation; Mating; Positive assortative mating

Indexed keywords

ALLONEMOBIUS; ALLONEMOBIUS FASCIATUS; ALLONEMOBIUS SOCIUS;

EID: 77953642840     PISSN: 08927553     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10905-010-9213-0     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Alexander RD (1962) The role of behavioral study in cricket classification. Syst Zool 11: 53-72.
2. Alexander RD, Marshall DC, Cooley JR (1997) Evolutionary perspectives on insect mating. In: Choe JC, Crespi BJ (eds) The evolution of mating systems in insects and arachnids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 4-31.
3. Birge LM, Braswell WE, Howard DJ (2007) A component of isolation between Allonemobius shalontaki (Orthoptera: Gryllidae: Nemobiinae) and a sympatric congener. Ann Entomol Soc Am 100: 721-728.
4. Boake CRB (2002) Sexual signaling and speciation, a microevolutionary perspective. Genetica 116: 205-214.
5. Boake CRB, Hoikkala A (1995) Courtship and mating success of wild-caught Drosophila silvestris males. Anim Behav 49: 1303-1313.
6. Braswell WE, Andres JA, Maroja LS, Harrison RG, Howard DJ, Swanson WJ (2006) Identification and comparative analysis of accessory gland proteins in Orthoptera. Genome 49: 1069.
7. Britch SC, Cain ML, Howard DJ (2001) Spatio-temporal dynamics of the Allonemobius fasciatus-A. socius mosaic hybrid zone: a 14-year perspective. Mol Ecol 10: 627-638.
8. Chapman T, Partridge L (1996) Female fitness in Drosophila melanogaster: an interaction between the effect of nutrition and of encounter rate with males. Proc R Soc Lond B 263: 755-759.
9. Chippindale AK, Leroi AM, Kim SB, Rose MR (1993) Phenotypic plasticity and selection in Drosophila life-history evolution. I. Nutrition and the cost of reproduction. J Evol Biol 6: 171-193.
10. Coyne JA, Orr HA (2004) Speciation. Sinauer, Sunderland.
11. Dewsbury DA (1982) Ejaculate cost and male choice. Am Nat 119: 601-610.
12. Doherty JA, Howard DJ (1996) Lack of preference for conspecific calling songs in female crickets. Anim Behav 51: 981-989.
13. Eberhard WG (1994) Evidence for wide-spread courtship during copulation in 131 species of insects and spiders, and implications for cryptic female choice. Evolution 48: 711-733.
14. Engqvist L, Reinhold K (2006) Theoretical influence of female mating status and remating propensity on male sperm allocation patterns. J Evol Biol 19: 1448-1458.
15. Fedorka KM, Mousseau TA (2002a) Material and genetic benefits of female multiple mating and polyandry. Anim Behav 64: 361-367.
16. Fedorka KM, Mousseau TA (2002b) Nuptial gifts and the evolution of male body size. Evolution 56: 590-596.
17. Fedorka KM, Mousseau TA (2002c) Tibial spur feeding in ground crickets: Larger males contribute larger gifts (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Fla Entomol 85: 317-323.
18. Fedorka KM, Mousseau TA (2004) Female mating bias results in conflicting sex-specific offspring fitness. Nature 429: 65-67.
19. Gavrilets S, Waxman D (2002) Sympatric speciation by sexual conflict. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 10533-10538.
20. Gregory PG, Howard DJ (1993) Laboratory hybridization studies of Allonemobius fasciatus and A. socius (Orthoptera, Gryllidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 86: 694-701.
21. Gregory PG, Howard DJ (1994) A post-insemination barrier to fertilization isolates 2 closely related ground crickets. Evolution 48: 705-710.
22. Gregory PG, Remmenga MD, Howard DJ (1998) Patterns of mating between two closely related ground crickets are not influenced by sympatry. Entomol Exper et Appl 87: 263-270.
23. Hoikkala A, Welbergen P (1995) Signals and responses of females and males in successful and unsuccessful courtship of three Hawaiian lek-mating Drosophila species. Anim Behav 50: 177-190.
24. Howard DJ, Berlocher SH (1998) Endless forms: species and speciation. Oxford University Press, New York.
25. Howard DJ, Gregory PG (1993) Post-insemination signaling systems and reinforcement. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 340: 231-236.
26. Howard DJ, Waring GL, Tibbets CA, Gregory PG (1993) Survival of hybrids in a mosaic hybrid zone. Evolution 47: 789-800.
27. Howard DJ, Gregory PG, Chu JM, Cain ML (1998a) Conspecific sperm precedence is an effective barrier to hybridization between closely related species. Evolution 52: 511-516.
28. Howard DJ, Reece M, Gregory PG, Chu J, Cain ML (1998b) The evolution of barriers to fertilization between closely related organisms. In: Howard DJ, Berlocher SH (eds) Endless forms: species and speciation. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 279-288.
29. Lande R (1981) Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78: 3721-3725.
30. Marshall JL (2004) The Allonemobius-Wolbachia host-endosymbiont system: Evidence for rapid speciation and against reproductive isolation driven by cytoplasmic incompatibility. Evolution 58: 2409-2425.
31. Marshall JL (2007) Rapid evolution of spermathecal duct length in the Allonemobius socius complex of crickets: species, population, and Wolbachia effects. PLoS ONE 8: e720.
32. Marshall JL, Arnold ML, Howard DJ (2002) Reinforcement: the road not taken. Trends Ecol Evol 17: 558-563.
33. Martinez Wells M, Henry CS (1992) The role of courtship songs in reproductive isolation among populations of green lacewings of the genus Chrysoperla (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Evolution 46: 31-42.
34. Mays DL (1971) Mating behavior of Nemobiine crickets-Hygronemobius nemobius, and Pteronmemobius (Ortherptera: Gryllidae). Fla Entomol 54: 113-126.
35. Nakatsuru K, Kramer DL (1982) Is sperm cheap? Limited male fertility and female choice in the Lemon tetra (Pisces: Characidae). Science 216: 753-755.
36. Olsson M, Madsen T, Shine R (1997) Is sperm really so cheap? Costs of reproduction in male adders, Vipera berus. Proc R Soc Lond B 264: 455-459.
37. Phelan PL, Baker TC (1990) Comparative study of courtship in twelve phycitine moths (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). J Insect Behav 3: 303-326.
38. Piper MDW, Skorupa D, Partridge L (2005) Diet, metabolism and lifespan in Drosophila. Exp Gerontol 40: 857-862.
39. Ptacek MB (2000) The role of mating preferences in shaping interspecific divergence in mating signals in vertebrates. Behav Process 51: 111-134.
40. Seehausen O, van Alphen JJM, Witte F (1997) Cichlid fish diversity threatened by eutrophication that curbs sexual selection. Science 277: 1808-1811.
41. Takimoto G, Higashi M, Yamamura M (2000) A deterministic genetic model for sympatric speciation by sexual selection. Evolution 54: 1870-1881.
42. Turner GF, Burrows MT (1995) A model of sympatric speciation by sexual selection. Proc R Soc Lond B 260: 287-292.
43. Uzendosski K, Verrell P (1993) Sexual incompatibility and mate-recognition systems: a study of two species of sympatric salamanders (Plethodontidae). Anim Behav 46: 267-278.
44. West-Eberhard MJ (1983) Sexual selection, social competition, and speciation. Q Rev Biol 58: 155-183.