Propagating error in land-cover-change analyses: Impact of temporal dependence under increased thematic complexity

International Journal of Geographical Information Science

Volumn 24, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 1043-1060

  Burnicki, Amy C ^a   Brown, Daniel G ^b   Goovaerts, Pierre ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^c BIOMEDWARE INC   (United States)

Author keywords

Complexity; Geostatistics; Land use and land cover change; Simulation; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; COMPLEXITY; GEOSTATISTICS; IMAGE CLASSIFICATION; LAND COVER; LAND USE CHANGE; SATELLITE IMAGERY; SIMULATION; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 77953641735     PISSN: 13658816     EISSN: 13623087     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13658810903279008     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Aplin, P., 2006. On scales and dynamics in observing the environment. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 27, 2123-2140.
2. Arbia, G., Griffith, D., and Haining, R., 1998. Error propagation modelling in raster GIS: overlay operations. International Journal of Geographic Information Science, 12, 145-167.
3. Burnicki, A. C., Brown, D.G., and Goovaerts, P., 2007. Simulating error propagation in land-cover change analysis: the implications of temporal dependence. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 31, 282-302.
4. Cadenasso, M.L., Pickett, S.T.A., and Grove, J.M., 2006. Dimension of ecosystem complexity: heterogeneity, connectivity, and history. Ecological Complexity, 3, 1-12.
5. Carmel, Y., 2004. Characterizing location and classification error patterns in time-series thematic maps. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1, 11-14.
6. Carmel, Y., Dean, D.J., and Flather, C.H., 2001. Combining location and classification error sources for estimating multi-temporal database accuracy. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 67, 865-872.
7. de Smith, M.J., Goodchild, M.F., and Longley, P.A., 2007. Geospatial analysis: a comprehensive guide to principles, techniques and software tools. 2nd ed. Leicester: Matador.
8. Deutsch, C.V. and Journel, A.G., 1992. GSLIB: Geostatistical software library and user's guide. New York: Oxford University Press.
9. Duh, J.-D. and Brown, D.G., 2005. Generating prescribed patterns in landscape models. In: D.J. Maguire, M. Batty, and M.F. Goodchild, eds. GIS, spatial analysis, and modeling. Redlands, CA: ESRI Press, 423-444.
10. Eastman, J.R., 1999. Idrisi 32: user's guide. Worcester, MA: Clark University.
11. Gómez-Hernández, J.J., 2006. Complexity. Ground Water, 44, 782-785.
12. Goodchild, M.F., Guoging, S., and Shiren, Y., 1992. Development and test of an error model for categorical data. International Journal of Geographic Information Systems, 6, 87-104.
13. Goovaerts, P., 1997. Geostatistics for natural resources evaluation. New York: Oxford University Press.
14. Heuvelink, G.B.M. and Burrough, P.A., 1993. Error propagation in cartographic modelling using Boolean logic and continuous classification. International Journal of Geographic Information Systems, 7, 231-246.
15. Ju, J., Gopal, S., and Kolaczyk, E., 2005. On the choice of spatial and categorical scale in remote sensing land cover classification. Remote Sensing of Environment, 96, 62-77.
16. Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C.D., and Vecchi, M.P., 1983. Optimization by simulated annealing. Science, 37,671-680.
17. Liu, H. and Zhou, Q., 2004. Accuracy analysis of remote sensing change detection by rule-based rationality evaluation with post-classification comparison. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 25, 1037-1050.
18. Mertens, B. and Lambin, E.F., 2000. Land-cover-change trajectories in southern Cameroon. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 90, 467-494.
19. National Research Council: Committee on Grand Challenges in Environmental Sciences, Oversight Commission for the Committee on Grand Challenges in Environmental Sciences, 2001. Grand challenges in environmental sciences. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
20. Nunes, C.and Augé, J.I. (eds.), 1999.Land-use and land-coverchange (LUCC) implementation strategy, IGBP global change. Stockholm, Sweden: IGBP Secretariat, Report No. 48 and HDP Report No. 10.
21. Ojima, D., et al., 2005. Global land project science plan and implementation strategy, IGBP global change. Stockholm, Sweden: IGBP Secretariat, Report No. 53 and HDP Report No. 19.
22. Overmars, K.P. and Verburg, P.H., 2005. Analysis of land use drivers at the watershed and household level: linking two paradigms at the Philippine forest fringe. International Journal of Geographic Information Science, 19, 125-152.
23. Pontius, R.G., Shusas, E., and McEachern, M., 2004. Detecting important categorical land changes while accounting for persistence. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 101, 251-268.
24. Schneider, L.C. and Pontius, R.G., 2001. Modeling land-use change in the Ipswich watershed, Massachusetts, USA. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 85, 83-94.
25. Serneels, S. and Lambin, E.F., 2001. Proximate causes of land-use change in Narok District, Kenya: a spatial statistical model. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 85, 65-81.
26. Sohl, T.L., Gallant, A.L., and Loveland, T.R., 2004. The characteristics and interpretability of land surface change and implications for project design. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 70, 439-448.
27. van Oort, P.A.J., 2005. Improving land cover change estimates by accounting for classification errors. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 26, 3009-3024.
28. Veldkamp, A. and Fresco, L.O., 1996. CLUE-CR: an integrated multi-scale model to simulate land use change scenarios in Costa Rica. Ecological Modeling, 91, 231-248.
29. Wagener, T. and Kollat, J., 2007. Numerical and visual evaluation of hydrological and environmental models using the Monte Carlo analysis tool box. Environmental Modeling & Software, 22, 1021-1033.
30. Wu, J. and David, J.L., 2002a. Modeling complex ecological systems: an introduction. Ecological Modeling, 153, 1-6.
31. Wu, J. and David, J.L., 2002b. A spatially explicit hierarchical approach to modeling complex ecological systems: theory and applications. Ecological Modeling, 153, 7-26.