Prediction of which patients with an abnormal intraoperative cholangiogram will have a confirmed stone at ERCP

Digestive Diseases and Sciences

Volumn 55, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1479-1484

  Spinn, Matthew P ^a   Wolf, David S ^a   Verma, Dharmendra ^a   Lukens, Frank J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Cholecystectomy; Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; ERCP; Intraoperative cholangiogram; IOC; Laparoscopic cholecystectom

Indexed keywords

ALANINE AMINOTRANSFERASE; ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; AMYLASE; ASPARTATE AMINOTRANSFERASE; BILIRUBIN; CONTRAST MEDIUM; TRIACYLGLYCEROL LIPASE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ALANINE AMINOTRANSFERASE BLOOD LEVEL; ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE BLOOD LEVEL; ARTICLE; ASPARTATE AMINOTRANSFERASE BLOOD LEVEL; BILIRUBIN BLOOD LEVEL; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CHOLECYSTITIS; CHOLELITHIASIS; COMMON BILE DUCT STONE; DUODENUM; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEUKOCYTE COUNT; LIVER FUNCTION TEST; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMAL RESIDUAL DISEASE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PANCREATITIS; PEROPERATIVE CHOLANGIOGRAPHY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGICAL PATIENT; TREATMENT INDICATION; UNIVARIATE ANALYSIS; CHOLANGIOGRAPHY; ECHOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PEROPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; RADIOGRAPHY; RISK FACTOR; STATISTICAL MODEL; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AMYLASES; CHOLANGIOGRAPHY; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE; CHOLELITHIASIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE CARE; LEUKOCYTE COUNT; LIPASE; LIVER FUNCTION TESTS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 77953638873     PISSN: 01632116     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10620-009-0894-1     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Everhart JE. Digestive diseases in the United States: Epidemiology and impact. Bethesda, MD: NIH, NIDDK; 1994; publication no. 94-1447.
2. McMahon AJ, Russell IT, Baxter JN, et al. Laparoscopic versus mini laparotomy cholecystectomy: A randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 1994;343:135-138.
3. Ammori BJ, Birbas K, Davides D, et al. Routine vs "on demand" postoperative ERCP for small bile duct calculi detected at intraoperative cholangiography: Clinical evaluation and costanalysis. Surg Endosc. 2000;14:1123-1126.
4. Besten LD, Doty JE. Choledocholithiasis. Surg Clin North Am. 1981;61:893-907.
5. Cranley B, Logan H. Exploration of the common bile duct: The relevance of the clinical picture and the importance of preoperativecholangiography. Br J Surg. 1980;67:869-872.
6. Hawasli A, Lloyd L, Cacucci B. Management of choledocholithiasis in the era of laparoscopic surgery. Am Surg. 2000; 66:425-430.
7. Hunter JG. Laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration. Am J Surg. 1992;163:53-56.
8. Martin IG, Curley P, McMahon MJ. Minimally invasive treatment for common bile duct stones. Br J Surg. 1993;80: 103-106.
9. Ryberg AA, Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Tseng A, et al. Abnormal cholangiograms during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 1997;11:456-459.
10. Freeman ML. Adverse outcomes of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56(6 Suppl):S273-S282.
11. Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G, et al. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: A prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;48:1-10.
12. Korman J, Cosgrove J, Furman M, et al. The role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and cholangiography in the laparoscopic era. Ann Surg. 1996;223:212-216.
13. Levine SB, Lerner HJ, Leifer ED, et al. Intraoperative cholangiography: A review of indications and analysis of age-sex groups. Ann Surg. 1983;198:692-697.
14. Perret RS, Sloop GD, Borne JA. Common bile duct measurements in an elderly population. J Ultrasound Med. 2000; 19:727-730.
15. Sackier JM, Berci G, Edward Phillips E, et al. The role of cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg. 1991;126:1021-1025.
16. Stuart SA, Simpson TIG, Alvord LA, et al. Routine intraoperative laparoscopic cholangiography. Am J Surg. 1998;176:632-637.
17. Clair DG, Carr-Locked DL, Becker JM, et al. Routine cholangiography is not warranted during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg. 1993;128:551-555.
18. Pietra N, Sarli L, Maccarini PU, et al. Five-year prospective audit of routine intravenous cholangiography and selective endoscopic retrograde cholangiography with or without intraoperative cholangiography in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg. 2000;24:345-352.
19. Koo KP, Traverso LW. Do preoperative indicators predict the presence of common bile duct stones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Am J Surg. 1996;171:495-499.
20. Hauer-Jensen M, Karesen R, Nygaard K, et al. Predictive ability of choledocholithiasis indicators. A prospective evaluation. Ann Surg. 1985;202:64-68.
21. Lacaine F, Corlette MB, Bismuth H. Preoperative evaluation of the risk of common bile duct stones. Arch Surg. 1980;115:1114-1116.
22. Prat F, Meduri B, Ducot B, et al. Prediction of common bile duct stones by noninvasive tests. Ann Surg. 1999;229:362-368.
23. Abboud PA, Malet PF, Berlin JA, et al. Predictors of common bile duct stones prior to cholecystectomy: A meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;44:450-455.
24. Trondsen E, Edwin B, Reiertsen O, et al. Prediction of common bile duct stones prior to cholecystectomy: A prospective validation of a discriminant analysis function. Arch Surg. 1998; 133:162-166.
25. Byrne MF, McLoughlin MT, Mitchell RM, et al. For patients with predicted low risk for choledocholithiasis undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, selective intraoperative cholangiography and postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is an effective strategy to limit unnecessary procedures. Surg Endosc. 2008;Epub Dec 31.
26. Phillips EH. Laparoscopic transcystic duct common bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc. 1998;12:365-366.
27. Urbach DR, Khajanchee YS, Jobe BA, et al. Cost-effective management of common bile duct stones: A decision analysis of the use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), intraoperative cholangiography, and laparoscopic bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:4-13.
28. Liberman MA, Phillips EH, Carroll BJ, et al. Cost-effective management of complicated choledocholithiasis: Laparoscopic transcystic duct exploration or endoscopic sphincterotomy. J Am Coll Surg. 1996;182:488-494.
29. Lilly MC, Arregui ME. A balanced approach to choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:467-472.
30. Duensing RA, Williams RA, Collins JC, et al. Managing choledocholithiasis in the laparoscopic era. Am J Surg. 1995; 170:619-623.
31. Lezoche E, Pagamimi A, Guerrieri M, et al. Technique and results of routine dynamic cholangiography during 528 consecutive laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Surg Endosc. 1994; 8:1443-1447.
32. Hainsworth PJ, Rhodes M, Gompertz RH, et al. Imaging of the common bile duct in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Gut. 1994;35:991-995.
33. Frossard JL, Hadengue A, Amouyal G, et al. Choledocholithiasis: A prospective study of spontaneous common bile duct stone migration. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;50:175-179.
34. Varadarajulu S, Eloubeidi MA, Wilcox CM, et al. Do all patients with abnormal intraoperative cholangiogram merit endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography? Surg Endosc. 2006;20: 801-805.
35. Bose SM, Mazumdar A, Prakash VS, et al. Evaluation of the predictors of choledocholithiasis: Comprehensive analysis of clinical, biochemical, radiological, radionuclear, and intraoperative parameters. Surg Today. 2001;31:117-122.
36. Katz D, Nikfarjam M, Sfakiotaki A, et al. Selective endoscopic cholangiography for the detection of common bile duct stones in patients with cholelithiasis. Endoscopy. 2004;36:1045-1049.
37. Onken JE, Brazer SR, Eisen GM, et al. Predicting the presence of choledocholithiasis in patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis. Am J Gastroenterol. 1996;91:762-767.
38. Vandervoort J, Soetikno RM, Tham TCK, et al. Risk factors for complications after performance of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56:652-656.
39. Phillips EH, Liberman M, Carroll BJ, et al. Bile duct stones in the laparoscopic era: Is preoperative sphincterotomy necessary? Arch Surg. 1995;130:880-886.
40. Sherman S, Ruffolo TA, Hawes RH, et al. Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy: A prospective series with emphasis on the increased risk associated with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction and nondilated bile ducts. Gastroenterology. 1991; 101:1068-1075.
41. Dexter SPL, Martin IG, Marton J, et al. Long operation and the risk of complications from laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 1997;84:464-466.
42. Phillips EH. The importance of intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am Surg. 1990;56:792-795.
43. Fulcher AS, Turner MA, Capps GW, et al. Half-Fourier RARE MR cholangiopancreatography in 300 subjects. Radiology. 1998;207:21-32.
44. Palazzo L, Girollet P-P, Salmeron M, et al. Value of endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of common bile duct stones: Comparison with surgical exploration and ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;42:225-231.
45. Soto JA, Barish MA, Alvarez O, et al. Detection of choledocholithiasis with MR cholangiography: Comparison of threedimensional fast spin-echo and single- and multisection half- Fourier rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement sequences. Radiology. 2000;215:737-745.
46. Sugiyama M, Atomi Y. Endoscopic ultrasonography for diagnosing choledocholithiasis: A prospective comparative study with ultrasonography and computed tomography. Gastrointest Endosc.1997;45:143-146.