Prediction of common bile duct stones prior to cholecystectomy: A prospective validation of a discriminant analysis function

Archives of Surgery

Volumn 133, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 162-166

  Trondsen, Erik ^a   Edwin, Bjørn ^a   Reiertsen, Ola ^a   Færden, Arne E ^a   Fagertun, Hans ^b   Rosseland, Arne R ^a  

^a AKERSHUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^b Medstat Research   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALANINE AMINOTRANSFERASE; BILIRUBIN; GAMMA GLUTAMYLTRANSFERASE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ALANINE AMINOTRANSFERASE BLOOD LEVEL; ARTICLE; BILE DUCT DILATATION; BILIRUBIN BLOOD LEVEL; CHILD; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CHOLELITHIASIS; COMMON BILE DUCT; COMMON BILE DUCT STONE; DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH ROUTE; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; ECHOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY; FEMALE; GAMMA GLUTAMYL TRANSFERASE BLOOD LEVEL; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PREDICTION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT;

ADULT; AGED; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE; CHOLECYSTECTOMY, LAPAROSCOPIC; CHOLELITHIASIS; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; GALLSTONES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPHINCTEROTOMY, ENDOSCOPIC;

EID: 0031913788     PISSN: 00040010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.133.2.162     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Neuhaus H, Feussner H, Ungeheuer A, Hoffmann W, Siewert JR, Classen M. Prospective evaluation of the use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography prior to laparoscopic cholecystography. Endoscopy. 1992;24:745-749.
2. Saltzstein EC, Peacock JB, Thomas MD. Preoperative bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase and amylase levels as predictors of common duct stones. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1982;154:381-384.
3. Lacaine F, Corlette MB, Bismuth H. Preoperative evaluation of the risk of common bile duct stones. Arch Surg. 1980;115:1114-1116.
4. Houdart R, Perniceni T, Darne B, Salmeron M, Simon JF. Predicting common bile duct lithiasis: determination and prospective validation of a model predicting low risk. Am J Surg. 1995;170:38-43.
5. Welbourn CRB, Mehta D, Armstrong CP, Gear MWL, Eyre-Brook IA. Selective Preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography with sphincterotomy avoids bile duct exploration during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Gut. 1995;37:576-579.
6. Trondsen E, Edwin B, Reiertsen O, Fagertun H, Rosseland AR. Selection criteria for endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERCP) in patients with gallstone disease. World J Surg. 1995;19:852-857.
7. Stiegman GV, Goff JS, Mansour A, Pearlman N, Reveille RM, Norton L. Precholecystectomy endoscopic cholangiography and stone removal is not superior to cholecystectomy, cholangiography, and common bile duct exploration. Am J Surg. 1992;163:227-230.
8. Mjåaland O, Raeder J, Aaseboe V, Trondsen E, Buanes T. Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy, patient satisfaction and safety: prospective study of 200 patients. Br J Surg. In press.
9. Rosseland AR, Osnes M. Biliary concrements: the endoscopic approach. World J Surg. 1989;13:178-185.
10. Hauer-Jensen M, Kåresen R, Nygaard K, et al. Predictive ability of choledocholithiasis indicators: a prospective evaluation. Ann Surg. 1985;202:64-68.
11. Hauer-Jensen M, Kåresen R, Nygaard K, et al. Consequences of routine preoperative cholangiography during cholecystectomy for gallstone disease: a prospective, randomized study. World J Surg. 1986;10:996-1002.
12. Altman DG. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London, England: Chapman & Hall; 1992.
13. Hand DJ. Discrimination and Classification. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1976.
14. Jennrich Rl. Stepwise discriminant analysis. In: Enslein K, Ralston A, Wilf H, eds. Statistical Methods for Digital Computers. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1979.
15. Voyles CR, Petro AB, Meena AL, Haick AJ, Koury AM. A practical approach to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 1991;161:365-370.
16. Cotton PB. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 1993;165:474-478.
17. Robertson GSM, Jagger C, Johnson PRV, et al. Selection criteria for preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in the laparoscopic era. Arch Surg. 1996;131:89-94.
18. Anciaux ML, Pelletier G, Attali P, Meduri B, Liguory C, Etienne JP. Prospective study of clinical and biochemical features of symptomatic choledocholithiasis. Dig Dis Sd. 1986;31:449-453.
19. Taylor TV, Armstrong CP, Rimmer S, Lucas SB, Jeacock J, Gunn AA. Prediction of choledocholithiasis using a pocket microcomputer. Br J Surg. 1988;75:138-140.
20. Reiss R, Deutsch AA, Nudelman I, Kott I. Statistical value of various clinical parameters in predicting the presence of choledochal stones. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1984;159:273-276.
21. Santo PD, Kazarian KK, Rogers JF, Bevins PA, Hall JR. Prediction of operative cholangiography in patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy with routine liver function chemistry. Surgery. 1985;98:7-11.
22. Barkun AN, Barkun JS. Fried GM, et al. Useful predictors of bile duct stones in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg. 1994;220:32-39.
23. Patwardhan RV, Smith OJ, Farmelant MH. Serum transaminase levels and cholescintigraphic anomalies in acute biliary tract obstruction. Arch Intern Med. 1987; 147:1249-1253.
24. Clemets D, Asian S, Wilkins WE. Common bile duct gallstones, anicteric presentation in the elderly: under-recognized but important. Postgrad Med J. 1990; 66:878-879.
25. Onken J, Brazer S, Eisen G, et al. Accurate prediction of choledocholithiasis. In: Program and abstracts of the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease, American Gastroenterological Association, American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, and Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract group conference; May 15-18, 1994; New Orleans, La. Abstract 699.
26. Bhargava S, Vashisht S, Kakaria A, Tandon RK, Berry M. Choledocholithiasis: an ultrasonic study with comparative evaluation with ERCP/PTC. Australas Radiol. 1988,32:220-226.
27. O'Connor HJ, Bartlett RJ, Hamilton I, et al. Bile duct calibre: the value of ultrasonic and cholangiographic measurement in the postcholecystectomy patient. Gut. 1984;25(suppl):A576.
28. Cooperberg PL, Li D, Wong P, Cohen MM, Burhenne HJ. Accuracy of common hepatic duct size in the evaluation of extrahepatic biliary obstruction. Radiology. 1980;135:141-144.
29. Hunt DR, Scott AJ. Changes in bile duct diameter after cholecystectomy: a 5-year prospective study. Gastmentemlogy. 1989;97:1485-1488.
30. Gross BH, Harter LP, Gore RM, et al. Ultrasonic evaluation of common bile duct stones: prospective comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Radiology. 1983;146:471-474.
31. Behan M, Kazam E. Sonography of the common bile duct: value of the right anterior oblique view. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1978;130:701-709.
32. Niederau C, Sonnenberg A, Mueller J. Comparison of the extrahepatic bile duct size measured by ultrasound and by different radiographic methods. Gastroenterology. 1984;87:615-621.
33. Sauerbrei EE, Cooperberg PL, Gordon P, Li D, Cohen MM, Burhenne HJ. The discrepancy between radiographic and sonographic bile duct measurements. Radiology. 1980;137:751-755.
34. Hunt DR, Reiter L, Scott AJ. Preoperative ultrasound measurement of bile duct diameter: basis for selective cholangiography Aust N Z J Surg. 1990;60:189-192.
35. Pasanen P, Partanen K, Pikkarainen P, Alhava E, Pirinen A, Janatuinen E. Ultrasonography, CT, and ERCP in the diagnosis of choledochal stones. Acta Radiol. 1992;33:53-56.
36. Kelly TR. Gallstone pancreatitis: the timing of surgery. Surgery. 1980;88:345-350.
37. Rosseland AR, Solhaug JH. Early or delayed endoscopic papillotomy (EPT) in gallstone pancreatitis. Ann Surg. 1984;199:165-167.
38. Edwin B, Rosseland ARR, Trondsen E. Prophylactic endoscopic sphincterotomy as treatment for gallstone pancreatitis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1993;28 (suppl 197):58.