Effect of bone to implant contact percentage on bone remodelling surrounding a dental implant

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Volumn 39, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 690-698

  Lian, Z ^a   Guan, H ^b   Ivanovski, S ^b   Loo, Y C ^b   Johnson, N W ^b   Zhang, H ^a  

^a DALIAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

bone remodelling; bone implant contact; dental implant; finite element analysis

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BONE; BONE DENSITY; BONE REMODELING; CLINICAL OBSERVATION; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; IMPLANT; JAW; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

ALGORITHMS; BIOMECHANICS; BITE FORCE; BONE DENSITY; BONE REMODELING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONNECTIVE TISSUE; CROWNS; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; ELASTIC MODULUS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MANDIBLE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; OSSEOINTEGRATION; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 77953620489     PISSN: 09015027     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2010.03.020     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Block M.S., Finger I.M., Fontenot M.G., and Kent J.N. Loaded hydroxylapatite-coated and grit-blasted titanium implants in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 4 (1989) 219-225
2. Carter D.R. Mechanical loading histories and cortical bone remodeling. Calcif Tissue Int 36 (1984) S19-S24
3. Carter D.R., and Hayes W.C. The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure. J Bone Joint Surg Am 59 (1977) 954-962
4. Chou H.Y., Jagodnik J.J., and Muftu S. Predictions of bone remodelling around dental implant systems. J Biomech 41 (2008) 1365-1373
5. Cowin S.C., and Firoozbakhsh K. Bone remodelling of diaphyseal surfaces under constant load: theoretical predictions. J Biomech 14 (1981) 471-484
6. Cowin S.C., Hart R.T., Baber J.R., and Kohn D.H. Functional adaptation in long bones: establishing in vivo values for surface remodelling rate coefficients. J Biomech 18 (1985) 665-684
7. Cowin S.C., and Hegedus D. Bone remodelling. I. Theory of adaptive elasticity. J Elasticity 6 (1976) 313-326
8. Cowin S.C., and Nachlinger R.R. Bone remodelling. III. Uniqueness and stability in adaptive elasticity theory. J Elasticity 8 (1978) 285-295
9. Currey J.D. The effect of porosity and mineral content on the Young's modulus of elasticity of compact bone. J Biomech 21 (1988) 131-139
10. Degide M., Petrone G., Lezzi G., and Piattelli A. Histologic evaluation of 2 human immediately loaded and 1 titanium implants inserted in the posterior mandible and submerged retrieved after 6 months. J Oral Implantol 29 (2003) 223-229
11. Firoozbakhsh K., and Cowin S.C. An analytical model of Pauwels' functional adaptation mechanism in bone. J Biomech Eng 103 (1981) 246-252
12. Frost H.M. The Laws of Bone Structure (1964), Thomas C C, Springfield
13. Grupi V., Guglielmino E., La Rosa G., Vander Sloten J., and Van Oosterwyck H. Numerical analysis of bone adaptation around an oral implant due to overload stress. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 218 (2004) 407-415
14. Huiskes R., Weinans H., Grootenboer H.J., Dalstra M., Fudala B., and Slooff T.J. Adaptive bone-remodeling theory applied to prosthetic design analysis. J Biomech 20 (1987) 1135-1150
15. Huiskes R., Weinans H., and van Rietbergen B. The relationship between stress shielding and bone resorption around total hip stems and the effects of flexible materials. Clin Orthop Relat Res 274 (1992) 124-134
16. Jacobs C.R., Simo J.C., Bearpre G.S., and Carter D.R. Adaptive bone remodeling incorporating simultaneous density and anisotropy considerations. J Biomech 30 (1997) 603-613
17. Li J.Y., Li H.Y., Shi L., Foa A.S., Ucer C., Devlin H., Horner K., and Silkas N. A mathematical model for simulating the bone remodeling process under mechanical stimulus. Dent Mater 23 (2007) 1073-1078
18. Lian ZQ, Guan H, Ivanovski S, Loo YC, Johnson NW, Zhang HW. Finite element simulation of bone remodelling in the human mandible surrounding dental implant. Acta Mechanica; Submitted.
19. Lu J., Pan K.F., Xu X.L., and Qu H.T. Influence of different bone contact ratio to stress distribution in bone around dental implant. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 15 (2005) 234-237 [in Chinese]
20. Mellal A., Wiskott H.W.A., Scherrer S.S., and Belser U.C. Stimulating effect of implant loading on surrounding bone. Comparison of three numerical models and validation by in vivo data. Clin Oral Implants Res 15 (2004) 239-248
21. Menicucci G., Mossolov A., Mozzati M., Lorenzetti M., and Preti G. Tooth-implant connection: some biomechanical aspects based on finite element analyses. Clin Oral Implants Res 13 (2002) 334-341
22. Mullender M.G., and Huiskes R. Proposal for the regulatory mechanism of Wolff's law. J Orthop Res 13 (1995) 503-512
23. Mullender M.G., Huiskes R., and Weinans H. A physiological approach to simulation of bone remodelling as a self-organizational control process. J Biomech 27 (1994) 1389-1394
24. Neoss Limited. Neoss Implant System Surgical Guidelines, UK (2006)
25. Neukam F.W., Flemmig T.F., and Working Group 3. Local and systemic conditions potentially compromising osseointegration. Consensus report of Working Group 3. Clin Oral Implants Res 17 (2006) 160-162
26. Papavasiliou G., Kamposiora P., Bayne S.C., and Felton D.A. 3D-FEA of bone-implant contact percentages and patterns on implant-bone interfacial stresses. J Dent 25 (1997) 485-491
27. Pauwels F. Biomechanics of the Locomotor Apparatus (1965), Springer, Berlin
28. Peng L., Bai J., Zeng X., and Zhou Y. Comparison of isotropic and orthotropic material property assignments on femoral finite element models under two loading conditions. Med Eng Phys 28 (2006) 227-233
29. Rice J.C., Cowin S.C., and Bowman J.A. On the dependence of the elasticity and strength of cancellous bone on apparent density. J Biomech 21 (1988) 155-168
30. Roberts W.E. Bone tissue interface. J Dent Educ 52 (1988) 804-809
31. Rubin C.T., and Lanyon L.E. Regulation of bone mass by mechanical strain magnitude. Calcif Tissue Int 37 (1985) 411-417
32. Ruimerman R., and Huiskes R. Development of a unifying theory for mechanical adaptation and maintenance of trabecular bone. Theor Issues Ergon Sci 6 (2005) 225-238
33. Simmons C.A., Meguid S.A., and Pilliar R.M. Mechanical regulation of localized and appositional bone formation around bone-interfacing implants. J Biomed Mater Res 55 (2001) 63-71
34. Testori T., Szmukler-Moncler S., Francetti L., Del Fabbro M., Trisi P., and Weinstein R.L. Healing of Osseotite implants under submerged and immediate loading conditions in a single patient: a case report and interface analysis after 2 months. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 22 (2002) 345-353
35. van Staden R.C., Guan H., and Loo Y.C. Application of the finite element method in dental implant research. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 9 (2006) 257-270
36. Watzak G., Zechner W., Ulm C., Tangl S., Tepper G., and Watzek G. Histologic and histomorphometric analysis of three types of dental implants following 18 months of occlusal loading: a preliminary study in baboons. Clin Oral Implants Res 16 (2005) 408-416
37. Weinans H., Huiskes R., and Grootenboer H.J. The behavior of adaptive bone-remodeling simulation models. J Biomech 25 (1992) 1425-1441
38. Wolff J.L. The law of bone remodelling. [Maquet P, Furlong R, Trans.] (1892), Springer-Verlag, Berlin [in 1986]
39. Xing X.J., Liu B.L., and Liu L. The influence of osseointegration percentage on implant-bone interfacial stresses. J Xi'an Jiaotong Univ (Med Sci) 23 (2002) 395-397 [in Chinese]
40. Zhu X.H., Gong H., Zhu D., and Gao B.Z. A study of the effect of non-linearities in the equation of bone remodelling. J Biomech 35 (2002) 951-960