Sensitivity of optimal shapes of artificial grafts with respect to flow parameters

Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering

Volumn 199, Issue 17-20, 2010, Pages 997-1005

  Probst, M ^a   Lulfesmann M ^a   Nicolai, M ^a   Bucker H M ^a   Behr, M ^a   Bischof, C H ^a  

^a RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Automatic differentiation; Blood flow; NURBS parametrization; PDE constrained shape optimization; Sensitivity analysis; Sensitivity of optimal shapes

Indexed keywords

BLOOD; CONSTITUTIVE MODELS; CONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION; FLOW OF FLUIDS; INTERPOLATION; NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS; NON NEWTONIAN FLOW; OPTIMIZATION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; VISCOSITY;

AUTOMATIC DIFFERENTIATION TOOL; AUTOMATIC DIFFERENTIATIONS; BLOOD FLOW; INCOMPRESSIBLE NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS; NURBS PARAMETRIZATION; OPTIMAL SHAPE; SHAPE OPTIMIZATION PROBLEM; SPECIFIC CONSTITUTIVE MODEL;

SHAPE OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 77953618303     PISSN: 00457825     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2009.11.013     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. J.S. Arora, Q. Wang, Review of formulations for structural and mechanical system optimization, Struct. Multidisciplin. Optim. 30 (4) (2005) 251-272.
2. A.R. Conn, K. Scheinberg, P. Toint, Recent progress in unconstrained nonlinear optimization without derivatives, Math. Program. 79 (1997) 397-414.
3. A.R. Conn, N.I.M. Gould, P.L. Toint, Trust-Region Methods, SIAM, Philadelphia, 2000.
4. V. Torczon, On the convergence of pattern search algorithms, SIAM J. Optim. 7 (1997) 1-25.
5. D.R. Jones, A taxonomy of global optimization methods based on response surfaces, J. Global Optim. 21 (2001) 345-383.
6. A.J. Booker, J.J.E. Dennis, P.D. Frank, D.B. Serafini, V. Torczon, M.W. Trosset, A rigorous framework for optimization of expensive functions by surrogates, Struct. Optim. 17 (1999) 1-13.
7. T.G. Kolda, R.M. Lewis, V. Torczon, Optimization by direct search: new perspectives on some classical and modern methods, SIAM Rev. 45 (3) (2003) 385-482.
8. J.E. Dennis, R.B. Schnabel, Numerical methods for unconstrained optimization and nonlinear equations, Reprinted by SIAM Publications (1993), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1983.
9. A. Jameson, Aerodynamic design via control theory, J. Sci. Comput. 3 (3) (1988) 233-260.
10. M.B. Giles, N.A. Pierce, An introduction to the adjoint approach to design, Flow Turbulence Combust. 65 (2000) 393-415.
11. B. Mohammadi, O. Pironneau, Applied Shape Optimization for Fluids, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001.
12. J. Nocedal, S.J. Wright, Numerical Optimization, second ed., Springer-Verlag, 2006.
13. K. Ito, S. Ravindran, Reduced basis method for optimal control of unsteady viscous flows, Int. J. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 15 (2) (2001) 97-113.
14. J. Burkardt, M. Gunzburger, H.-C. Lee, POD and CVT-based reduced-order modeling of Navier-Stokes flows, Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engrg. 196 (1-3) (2006) 337-355.
15. A. Quarteroni, G. Rozza, Numerical solution of parametrized Navier-Stokes equations by reduced basis methods, Numer. Meth. Partial Differ. Equat. 23 (4) (2007) 923-948.
16. N. Nguyen, K. Veroy, A. Patera, Handbook of Materials Modeling, Ch. Certified Real-Time Solutions of Parametrized Partial Differential Equations, Springer, Berlin, 2005. pp. 1523-1559.
17. A. Griewank, A. Walther, Algorithm 799: revolve: an implementation of checkpoint for the reverse or adjoint mode of computational differentiation, ACM Trans. Math. Software 26 (1) (1999) 19.
18. D. Fei, J.D. Thomas, S.E. Rittgers, The effect of angle and flow rate upon hemodynamics in distal vascular graft anastomoses: a numerical model study, ASME J. Biomed. Engrg. 116 (1994) 331-336.
19. F.L. Xiong, C.K. Chong, A parametric numerical investigation on hemodynamics in distal coronary anastomoses, Med. Engrg. Phys. 30 (3) (2008) 311-320.
20. G. Rozza, On optimization, control and shape design of an arterial bypass, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 47 (10-11) (2005) 1411-1419.
21. A.L. Marsden, J.A. Feinstein, C.A. Taylor, A computational framework for derivative-free optimization of cardiovascular geometries, Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engrg. 197 (21-24) (2008) 1890-1905.
22. C. Zarins, D. Giddens, B. Bharadvaj, V. Sottiurai, R. Mabon, S. Glagov, Carotid bifurcation atherosclerosis: quantitative correlation of plaque localization with flow velocity profiles and wall shear stress, Circ. Res. 53 (4) (1983) 502- 524.
23. D. Wells, J.P. Archie, C. Kleinstreuer, Effect of carotid artery geometry on the magnitude and distribution of wall shear stress gradients, J. Vascular Surg. 23 (4) (1996) 667-678.
24. C.A. Taylor, C.P. Cheng, L.A. Espinosa, B.T. Tang, D. Parker, R.J. Herfkens, In vivo quantification of blood flow and wall shear stress in the human abdominal aorta during lower limb exercise, Ann. Biomed. Engrg. 30 (2002) 402-408.
25. M. Giersiepen, L.J. Wurzinger, R. Opitz, H. Reul, Estimation of shear stressrelated blood damage in heart valve prostheses - in vitro comparison of 25 aortic valves, Int. J. Artificial Org. 13 (5) (1990) 300-306.
26. S. Sankaran, Stochatic optimization using a sparse grid collocation scheme, Probab. Engrg. Mech. (2009) 382-396.
27. F. Abraham, M. Behr, M. Heinkenschloss, Shape optimization in steady blood flow: a numerical study of non-Newtonian effects, Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering 8 (2) (2005) 127-137.
28. M. Probst, M. Lülfesmann, H.M. Bücker, M. Behr, C.H. Bischof, Sensitivity of shear rate in artificial grafts using automatic differentiation, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids (2009), in press, doi:10.1002/fld.2051.
29. J. Haslinger, R.A.E. Mäkinen, Introduction to Shape Optimization: Theory, Approximation, and Computation, Advances in Design and Control, SIAM, Philadelphia, PA, 2003.
30. L. Goubergrits, K. Affeld, Numerical estimation of blood damage in artificial organs, Artificial Organs 28 (5) (2004) 499-507.
31. L. Gu, W.A. Smith, Evaluation of computational models for hemolysis estimation, ASAIO Journal 51 (2005) 202-207.
32. D. Arora, M. Behr, M. Pasquali, A tensor-based measure for estimating blood damage, Artificial Organs 28 (2004) 1002-1015.
33. A. Garon, M.-I. Farinas, Fast 3D numerical hemolysis approximation, Artificial Organs 28 (11) (2004) 1016-1025.
34. R. Temam, Navier-Stokes Equations, North-Holland, 1977.
35. C. Hirsch, Numerical Computation of Internal and External Flows, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1988.
36. P.M. Gresho, R.L. Sani, Incompressible Flow and the Finite Element Method, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1998.
37. S. Chien, R.G. King, R. Skalak, S. Usami, A.L. Copley, Viscoelastic properties of human blood and red cell suspensions, Biorheology 12 (6) (1975) 341-346.
38. G.B. Thurston, Viscoelasticity of human blood, Biophysical Journal 12 (1972) 1205-1217.
39. S.A. Berger, L.D. Jou, Flows in stenotic vessels, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 32 (2000) 347-382.
40. B.M. Johnston, P.R. Johnston, S. Corney, D. Kilpatrick, Non-Newtonian blood flow in human right coronary arteries: Steady state simulations, Journal of Biomechanics 37 (2004) 709-720.
41. C.M. Rodkiewicz, P. Sinha, J.S. Kennedy, On the application of a constitutive equation for whole human blood, Journal of Biomedical Engineering 112 (1990) 198-206.
42. K. Perktold, M. Resch, H. Florian, Pulsatile non-Newtonian flow characteristics in a three-dimensional human carotid bifurcation model, Journal of Biomedical Engineering 113 (1991) 464-475.
43. F.J.H. Gijsen, F.N. van de Vosse, J.D. Janssen, The influence of the non-Newtonian properties of blood on the flow in large arteries: Steady flow in a carotid bifurcation model, Journal of Biomechanics 32 (1999) 601-608.
44. M. Lukáščová-Medvid'ová, A. Zaušková, Numerical modelling of shear-thinning non-Newtonian flows in compliant vessels, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 56 (8) (2008) 1409-1415.
45. A. Leuprecht, K. Perktold, Computer simulation of non-Newtonian effects on blood flow in large arteries, Comput. Meth. Biomech. Biomed. Engrg. 4 (2001) 149-163.
46. L.B. Rall, Automatic Differentiation: Techniques and Applications, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1981. Vol. 120.
47. A. Griewank, A. Walther, Evaluating Derivatives: Principles and Techniques of Algorithmic Differentiation, second ed., No. 105 in Other Titles in Applied Mathematics, SIAM, Philadelphia, PA, 2008.
48. R. Griesse, A. Walther, Parametric sensitivities for optimal control problems using automatic differentiation, Optim. Control Appl. Meth. 24 (6) (2003) 297- 314.
49. A.V. Fiacco, Introduction to Sensitivity and Stability Analysis, No. 165 in Mathematics in Science and Engineering, Academic Press, New York, 1983.
50. L. Piegl, W. Tiller, The NURBS Book, second ed., Monographs in Visual Communication, Springer-Verlag, 1997.
51. A.A. Johnson, T.E. Tezduyar, Mesh update strategies in parallel finite element computations of flow problems with moving boundaries and interfaces, Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engrg. 119 (1994) 73-94.
52. M. Behr, T.E. Tezduyar, Finite element solution strategies for large-scale flow simulations, Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engrg. 112 (1994) 3-24.
53. P. Spellucci, A new technique for inconsistent QP problems in the SQP method, Math. Meth. Operat. Res. 47 (1998) 355-400.
54. P. Spellucci, An SQP method for general nonlinear programs using only equality constrained subproblems, Math. Program. 82 (1998) 413-448.
55. C.H. Bischof, A. Carle, P. Khademi, A. Mauer, ADIFOR 2.0: automatic differentiation of Fortran 77 programs, IEEE Comput. Sci. Engrg. 3 (3) (1996) 18-32.
56. L. Hascoët, V. Pascual, Tapenade 2.1 User's Guide, Technical Report 0300, INRIA, 2004.