Sensitivity of shear rate in artificial grafts using automatic differentiation

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids

Volumn 62, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 1047-1062

  Probst, M ^a   Lulfesmann M ^a   Bucker H M ^a   Behr, M ^a   Bischof, C H ^a  

^a RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Automatic differentiation; Blood flow; Sensitivity analysis; Shape optimization; Shear thinning model

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL GRAFTS; AUTOMATIC DIFFERENTIATIONS; BLOOD FLOW; FLOW SOLVER; FLUID MODELS; GENERALIZED NEWTONIAN FLUID MODEL; INCOMPRESSIBLE NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS; NUMERICAL SIMULATION; SHAPE OPTIMIZATION PROBLEM; SHEAR RATES; SHEAR THINNING; SHEAR-THINNING BEHAVIOR; SPECIFIC CONSTITUTIVE MODEL;

BLOOD; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION; DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; GRAFTS; HEMODYNAMICS; NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS; PLASMA FLOW; PLASMAS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SHEAR DEFORMATION; VISCOSITY;

SHAPE OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 77950173875     PISSN: 02712091     EISSN: 10970363     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/fld.2061     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Giersiepen M, Wurzinger LJ, Opitz R, Reul H. Estimation of shear stress-related blood damage in heart valve prostheses-in vitro comparison of 25 aortic valves. The International Journal of Artificial Organs 1990; 13(5):300-306.
2. Bludszuweit C. Model for general mechanical blood damage prediction. Artificial Organs 1995; 19(7):583-589.
3. Arvand A, Hormes M, Reul H. A validated computational fluid dynamics model to estimate hemolysis in a rotary blood pump. Artificial Organs 2005; 29(7):531-540.
4. Johnston BM, Johnston PR, Corney S, Kilpatrick D. Non-Newtonian blood flow in human right coronary arteries: steady state simulations. Journal of Biomechanics 2004; 37:709-720.
5. Johnston BM, Johnston PR, Corney S, Kilpatrick D. Non-Newtonian blood flow in human right coronary arteries: transient simulations. Journal of Biomechanics 2006; 39:1116-1128.
6. Leuprecht A, Perktold K. Computer simulation of non-Newtonian effects on blood flow in large arteries. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering 2001; 4:149-163.
7. Siauw WL, Ng EYK, Mazumdar J. Unsteady stenosis flow prediction: a comparative study of non-Newtonian models with operator splitting scheme. Medical Engineering and Physics 2000; 22:265-277.
8. Abraham F, Behr M, Heinkenschloss M. Shape optimization in steady blood flow: a numerical study of non- Newtonian effects. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering 2005; 8(2):127-137.
9. Ku JP, Draney MT, Arko FR, Lee WA, Chan FP, Pelc NJ, Zarins CK, Taylor CA. In vivo validation of numerical prediction of blood flow in arterial bypass grafts. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 2002; 30:743-752.
10. Leuprecht A, Perktold K, Prosi M, Berk T, Trubel W, Schima H. Numerical study of hemodynamics and wall mechanics in distal end-to-side anastomoses of bypass grafts. Journal of Biomechanics 2002; 35:225-236.
11. Loth F, Fischer PF, Bassiouny HS. Blood flow in end-to-side anastomoses. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 2008; 40:367-393.
12. Xiong FL, Chong CK. A parametric numerical investigation on hemodynamics in distal coronary anastomoses. Medical Engineering and Physics 2008; 30(3):311-320.
13. Fei D, Thomas JD, Rittgers SE. The effect of angle and flow rate upon hemodynamics in distal vascular graft anastomoses: a numerical model study. Journal of Biomedical Engineering (ASME) 1994; 116:331-336.
14. Marsden AL, Feinstein JA, Taylor CA. A computational framework for derivative-free optimization of cardiovascular geometries. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2008; 197(21-24): 1890-1905.
15. Kolachalama VB, Bressloff NW, Nair PB, Shearman CP. Predictive haemodynamics in a one-dimensional human carotid artery bifurcation, part II: application to graft design. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 2008; 3:1176-1184.
16. Rozza G. On optimization, control and shape design of an arterial bypass. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2005; 47(10-11):1411-1419.
17. Agoshkov V, Quarteroni A, Rozza G. Shape design in aorto-coronaric bypass anastomoses using perturbation theory. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 2006; 44(1):367-384.
18. Wylie B, Geimer M, Nicolai M, Probst M. Performance analysis and tuning of the XNS CFD solver on BlueGene/L. In Proceedings of the 14th EuroPVM/MPI Conference, Capello F, Herault T, Dongarra J (eds). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4757. Springer: Berlin, 2007; 107-116.
19. Griewank A, Walther A. Evaluating Derivatives: Principles and Techniques of Algorithmic Differentiation (2nd edn). Other Titles in Applied Mathematics, vol. 105. SIAM: Philadelphia, PA, 2008.
20. Rall LB. Automatic Differentiation: Techniques and Applications. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 120. Springer: Berlin, 1981.
21. Griewank A, Corliss G. Automatic Differentiation of Algorithms. SIAM: Philadelphia, PA, 1991.
22. Berz M, Bischof C, Corliss G, Griewank A (eds). Computational Differentiation: Techniques, Applications, and Tools. SIAM: Philadelphia, PA, 1996.
23. Corliss G, Faure C, Griewank A, Hascoët L, Naumann U (eds). Automatic Differentiation of Algorithms: From Simulation to Optimization. Springer: New York, 2002.
24. Bücker HM, Corliss GF, Hovland PD, Naumann U, Norris B (eds). Automatic Differentiation: Applications, Theory, and Implementations. Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, vol. 50. Springer: New York, 2005.
25. Bischof CH, Bücker HM, Hovland PD, Naumann U, Utke J (eds). Advances in Automatic Differentiation. Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, vol. 64. Springer: New York, 2008.
26. Bücker HM. Hierarchical algorithms for automatic differentiation. Habilitationsschrift, Faculty of Mathematics, Computer Science, and Natural Sciences, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, 2002.
27. Bischof CH, Haghighat MR. Hierarchical approaches to automatic differentiation. In Computational Differentiation: Techniques, Applications, and Tools, Berz M, Bischof C, Corliss G, Griewank A (eds). SIAM: Philadelphia, PA, 1996; 83-94.
28. Hovland P, Norris B, Roh L, Smith B. Developing a derivative-enhanced object-oriented toolkit for scientific computations. In Object Oriented Methods for Interoperable Scientific and Engineering Computing: Proceedings of the 1998 SIAM Workshop, Henderson ME, Anderson CR, Lyons SL (eds). SIAM: Philadelphia, 1999; 129-137.
29. Bischof CH, Bücker HM, Hovland PD. On combining computational differentiation and toolkits for parallel scientific computing. In Euro-Par 2000-Parallel Processing, Proceedings of the Sixth International Euro-Par Conference, Munich, Germany, August/September 2000, Bode A, Ludwig T, Karl W, Wismüller R (eds). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1900. Springer: Berlin, 2000; 86-94.
30. Saad Y. Iterative Methods for Sparse Linear Systems (2nd edn). SIAM: Philadelphia, 2003.
31. Tadjouddine M, Forth SA, Keane AJ. Adjoint differentiation of a structural dynamics solver. In Automatic Differentiation: Applications, Theory, and Implementations,Bücker HM, Corliss GF, Hovland PD, Naumann U, Norris B (eds). Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, vol. 50. Springer: New York, 2005; 309-319.
32. Bücker HM, Elsheikh A, Vehreschild A. A system for interfacing MATLAB with external software geared toward automatic differentiation. In Mathematical Software-ICMS 2006, Proceedings of the Second International Congress on Mathematical Software, Castro Urdiales, Spain, 1-3 September 2006, Iglesias A, Takayama N (eds). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4151. Springer: Berlin, 2006; 373-384.
33. Bischof C, Carle A, Khademi P, Mauer A. ADIFOR 2.0: automatic differentiation of Fortran 77 programs. IEEE Computational Science and Engineering 1996; 3(3):18-32.